12-1-25
Mr. Thomas P. Barber:
Enclosed are some records of what you knew and when you decided to racketeer with Victor Crist. I informed you as to why case 25-CA-8096 should’ve been sent back to state court on 11-17-25, but you quickly dismissed it under case 25-CV-3077 on 11-18-25. Your JA lied to me on 11-17-25 at 1:45pm (813-301-6160) by telling me Fisher and Phillips LLP transferred case 25-CA-8096 and absolutely had the authority to do so. Total bull chips, sir! You didn’t have jurisdiction to work on incomplete case 25-CV-3077, because it lacked permission from all of the Defendants in case 25-CA-8096. You participated with the FRB, in once again another successful racketeering conspiracy to defraud me in state court, while receiving FRB bribe/perk moneys with Victor Crist in violation of, but not limited to:
1. Title 18, Chapter 73, Section 1346; 1341; and 1343, under F.S. 895;
2. F.S. 838.022(a);(b);&(c);
3. F.S. 112.3173(e)(6);
4. Florida Chapter 817 – – F.S. 817.155; and
5. F.S. 843.14.
Reverse your dismissal of this case and close it, but don’t send it back to me after you tortiously interfered in it. Stay out of my fight with Alex and his FRB! Murderer!
Attorney Brett Owens from Fisher and Phillips LLP DIDN’T transfer case 25-CA-8096 to your courthouse, Victor Crist and Mark Ware DID, after you agreed to racketeer with them during a conversation you had with Mark Ware! It’s true Brett Owens DIDN’T comply with Title 28, USC Codes § 1441 and § 1446 on 11-10-25 to legally have Victor Crist transfer case 25-CA-8096, when all Defendants didn’t officially know and agree to having the matter transferred to federal court. Victor Crist transferred case 25-CA-8096 out of the BOCC courthouse the next day! I dropped the FRB from case 25-CA-8096 three (3) days later on 11-14-25, but requiring any Defendant to decide on transferring this case themselves, would’ve been a misrepresentation of the facts since the case was already illegally closed. You, Victor and Mark already knew this, but were still going forwards on the illegal plan to trash case 25-CA-8096! We’ll let a jury decide on the FRB’s default…
If a party bribes you Mr. Barber to illegally rule in its favor, and you do so, you’re responsible for injuring opposing parties physically; emotionally; and monetarily . You Mr. Barber planned on committing both honest services fraud and obstructing justice under both state and federal statutes when you agreed in ADVANCE to both accept and dismiss case 25-CA-8096, illegally transferred to you by Victor Crist, and are now guilty of doing such, by wrongly misrepresenting state case 25-CA-8096 as being a shotgun pleading with a false dismissal given, when no violation of federal RCP Rule 8; Twombly; nor Florida RCP 1.110, were committed by me, at least enough to dismiss the entire complaint with! I’m pretty detailed in my allegations and counts, so you would’ve had to find absolutely no merit (cause of action) within the complaint. Complete bull chips, sir! You also intentionally made a ruling on the wrong complaint, when you never had jurisdiction to hear any one of my complaints as a federal judge! If I could, I’d fire you, Mark Ware, Kathleen Rocamora and the infamous sneaky/stupid Victor Crist immediately and prosecute all of you under a half dozen criminal offenses!
When a judge conveniently fails to give material facts and details as to where in a complaint the information is vague or conclusory, with documented proof in the appendices that the statements of fact are in fact true, he or she’s a liar! You also knowingly lied by accusing Fisher and Phillips LLP of wrongdoing, when it was a third party participant in this matter, but YOU and Victor Crist blatantly committed the crimes! Public and private FRB contracted/paid agents commit honest services frauds in violation of the Respondeat Superior Doctrine and Law of Agency for their benefactors, not opposing parties! You aided and abetted in RUINING case 25-CA-8096 before the fact (ABTF) and should be FIRED with your state pension PULLED!
Alex Rothschild correctly sent me BACK my documents and smugly told me “Better luck next time.” A humiliating experience due to you Mr. Barber racketeering for your benefactor! To a reasonable prudent person, you’re the right kind of judicial participant the FRB requires to defraud consumers out of their due process rights; properties; and lives! Alex was behind your wrongful involvement through his FRB cartel of banking syndicates, definitely not a corporation nor a federal agency, but one (1) wickedly crooked banking organization which FUNDS/INVESTS in all agencies in America, in violation of Title 18, Chapter 96, Section 1962(b), for the purpose of acquiring an interest in, for the control of, continued racketeering activities to be committed on poor pigeons to be plucked (consumers). Do the FRB owners really need greedy judges to make RIDICULOUS rulings to defraud consumers? They could have hungry CHIMPS do it for them and pay them in bananas! How the FRB, not a federal agency, has wrongful clearance NOT to be sued in state court, is obviously due its long history of bribing public agents, to illegally rewrite laws in violation of state and federal constitutional rights, for increased FRB profits and gains! Another mystery is how much perk moneys you, Victor, Mark and Fisher & Phillips LLP obtained from Alex as a VERY SATISFIED participant in your racketeering activities? By Alex’s JUBILATION at illegally beating me, I’d say 6 figures worth of highly devalued USD paper money was issued. You CLEARLY committed RICO predicate acts by wrongly 1) AGREEING to work case 25-CV-3077 under Section 1962(d) beforehand ; and by wrongly 2) dismissing it under Section 1962(c). YOU KEEP CASE 25-CA-8096! The blatantly obvious facts that: A) the transfer of this case by Victor Crist failed to meet Federal RCP guidelines, nor did B) any Defendant in it, have jurisdiction to be heard in federal court, is now supposedly RELEVANT to you when you want to conveniently blame Fisher and Phillips LLP for RICO injuries it never committed, with supposedly you; Victor and Mark oblivious to any knowledge of having committed RICO predicate acts. Sure, laughingly blame it all on Fisher… Victor Crist; Mark Ware; and you Thomas Barber are the proximate cause of the fraud in this matter. Fisher & Phillips LLP set the illegal case transfer up, but only after getting Victor Crist’s approval, which had to get it from you first. Fisher & Phillips LLP was merely a messenger for your FRB LORD and MASTER, who ordered a few spineless freaks to break the law.
When case 25-CA-8096 was closed twice by Victor Crist, all of the Defendants were correct in believing they didn’t have to bother with it again because God Rothschild had delivered another death blow! Foreign American Alex, who was going to default, may decide to participate now that he’s been REASSURED of having crooked American grunts ready to sock it to me again with their pants down, NO MATTER HOW OBVIOUS! You blatantly committed a Fraud on the Court with Victor Crist as an AATF in a murder cover-up, which tolls the time limit Mr. Barber!
A statute of limitations doesn’t accrue in Florida until the injury is known (Florida’s Date of Discovery Rule). Sum sufficient proof my wife’s death was caused from murder, committed by David Dawson II and his passenger, wasn’t determined until I received her partial murder video by email in 2024 from FHP, with an attorney’s review of it, who determined there was clearly a tort committed in violation of Florida statute, with a hired investigator stating the consensus was murder, not negligence. And I still don’t really know how she died, when I don’t have the rest of the FHP murder video and her TGH medical records, now do I? New state cases 25-CA-11800 and 25-CA-11806 were filed by me in mid-November 2025,less than two (2) years before I had the incomplete knowledge of her murder, with most of the process of service now completed. What you’ve CONFIRMED Mr. Barber, is my state and federal due process rights continuing to be INTENTIONALLY violated by FRB CARTEL owners’ contracted/paid judges and BOCC courthouse personnel, going on 14 years now! What about the other 10 million consumers you aid and abet the FRB in defrauding under Section 1962(d) every year? You could write a best seller on this topic: Fast Times Chasing Easy FRB Moneys: The Grooming of an FRB Made Man, by Thomas P. Barber
You and your criminally trained FRB paid law clerks, intentionally committed racketeering activities, and the injuries given to me may have been PERMANENT! Out of many federal judges in your courthouse, you were the one who received case 25-CA-8096, and Mark Ware contacted you BEFORE working on this matter. I’ve made no mistake on this fact, sir! Mark Ware contacted you beforehand with many BOCC contracted/paid witnesses (Kathleen Rocamora spilled her guts), so you’d work the bogus case, NOT stupidly send it back to Victor Crist. This makes perfect racketeering sense. What do you think Mr. Barber as a professional racketeer? You racketeered with the local concert under Title 18, Chapter 96, Section, 1962(c & d) As an accessory BEFORE the fact (ABTF), and are now LYING about what you knew and when you knew it! Being a contracted/paid judge for the FRB, means racketeering consumers out of their lives, day in and day out, with an FRB rigged rotation of judges assigned! Now you know why millions of smart Americans are moving out of America every year. IT’S YOUR FAULT!
I absolutely don’t want you in my life! Honest consumers don’t want charlatan FRB contracted/paid judges in their lives! Scat cat! You’ve been a burr in my backside, tortiously interfering for the FRB owners for decades! Any action you make on any bench, is most definitely for the FRB’s benefit! Consider this message my recusal of you from YOUR bogus case 25-CV-3077. You currently owe me $300 for the added expense of refiling my new cases with possibly more owed, if I have to run ads, because the Defendant now know process servers will be knocking on their doors!
I find you disgustingly irritating, after having filed my complaint on you with the 11th Circuit, you now suddenly start blaming Fisher & Phillips LLP for your ill-gotten FRB gains, when it’s WHAT YOU DO FOR A LIVING! I already know what you’re going to do next, you’re going to flip flop on your last illegal ruling, like you’re a drug addict suffering from temporary loss of memory. I must have some winning new judges this time around, which your gang can’t assuredly bribe or extort without risk. For the record, I’ll pay any judge at least a 5% REWARD to provide me honest services on the $65 million owed, so justice can finally prevail in this crooked FRB owned and operated country! And you can take that to the bank, but not my reward moneys Mr. Barber, it will only be going to sneaky/smart judges! I’m allowed to drop parties once without a penalty as a matter of law, or dismiss an entire complaint and file more within the time limit on different parties, or on the same parties with new allegations or counts. I just did so! And since my complaint was supposedly so poorly written, you couldn’t understand which Defendants committed which allegations or counts, ha-ha-ha…, I filed 2 new legitimate cases! I remember your illegal strategy for sticking consumers with bad state judges to be fleeced for the FRB, is to wrongly dismiss good cases with new facts, sending them back to the original losing FRB bribed judges. THIS ISN’T GOING TO HAPPEN THIS TIME, WHEN I HAVE EVERYONE LOOKING INTO THIS MATTER.
You’re memory’s fuzzy on a lot of applicable laws and overzealous in abusively dismissing counts against FRB paid agencies and corporations, within the permissible range. So why don’t you purchase Mrs. Kimball’s book and read about you and your gang’s unholy conquests and murderous endeavors. The book’s called “Code of Silence 2”. Your money will be well spent, with the profits donated to the charity of your choice. Will that be either the Rockefeller or Rothschild Foundation?
D. Schneider
10406 N. 26 Street
Tampa, FL 33612
813-585-0552
In The 13th Judicial Circuit
Tampa, Florida Division
1. Darryl Schneider
Plaintiff
Case 25-CV-8096
1. David Dawson II, Et. Al
Defendants
___________________________/
Notice of Retracting the Dropping of Parties by the Plaintiff on 11-14-25, which was VOID due to a Fraud on the Court
1. The FRB is a cartel of banking syndicates, which is not the same entity as one of its branch banks, not being sued in case 25-CA-8096. The definition of a syndicate is a group of individuals or organizations combined to promote some common interest, through a singular entity, like the FRB bank which owns and controls its branches, not the other way around.
2. A cartel is an association of manufacturers or suppliers with the purpose of maintaining prices at a high level and restricting competition, through a singular entity like the FRB bank. Incorporated banks, like Rothschild & Co. and Chase, are not the same entities as the unincorporated quasi-government FRB, but merely subsidiaries! And the FRB San Francisco branch, is not the same entity as the FRB! When a business is being sued, its branch office can only act as an agent for the parent, not as the parent being sued in the complaint.
3. Subsidiaries and agent branches cannot be sued in place of their parent business entities. Only process of service can be performed on a business through its subsidiary or branch, unless the subsidiary or branch is the one being sued! In which case, that entity has to be named in the style of the case with that corresponding address of that entity in the complaint, not just on the summons! And the FRB San Francisco branch was never mentioned in this complaint!
4. No 11th Circuit district court has ever accepted transfer of a state case to federal court prior to all defendants answering their summonses. Consequently the proper procedures were not followed in case 25-CA-8096, before it was illegally transferred, not by Judge Nash, but by the Victor Crist, Clerk of the Court!
***5. The parent FRB cartel being sued, is made up of about 20 banking syndicates, and was the only banking entity owned by this cartel being sued in case 25-CA-8096. Only it was required to respond to its summons issued from case 25-CA-8096. This did not happen!
***5. By the FRB NOT responding to its summons, its separate entity branch office had NO right to ask for case 25-CA-8096 to be transferred to case 25-CV-3077, because a case does not officially start until all the defendants respond to their summonses first! The FRB San Francisco branch did respond, but not its parent FRB being sued! The parent FRB in New York obviously wanted to, and technically did, default in case 25-CA-8096, 21 days after process of service was performed on one of its agent branches! It was clearly an intentional Fraud on the Court committed by the FRB, when it wrongly had its branch bank of San Francisco name itself as the Defendant in cases 25-CA-8096 and 25-CV-3077, thus throwing me off as to why it was committing a Fraud on the Court, but now I know:
1) The FRB did not wish to incriminate itself further by answering its summons, period!
2) Yet it did not wish to default either, so it contracted and paid Fisher and Phillips LLP. to illegally make it ridiculously look like I was suing its San Francisco branch, as an FRB subsidiary or branch office – – a separate entity to the FRB. Total bull chips! Fisher and Phillips LLP’s notice to transfer case 25-CA-8096, was laughingly made to look like a response from the FRB being sued. Complete bull chips! The FRB would have rather taken its chances with Judge Nash after defaulting, then answer its summons, so it fraudulently filed case 25-CV-3077 and stuck some bull chip down my back! The FRB did not wish to give Judge Nash personal jurisdiction over it by responding to its summons, yet it still did so when it filed a pleading in the case under a fictitious entity, intentionally committing a Fraud on the Court. This is why the FRB bribed crooked Victor Crist through Fisher and Phillips LLP to illegally transfer case 25-CA-8096 quickly!
6. My dropping the FRB from case 25-CA-8096 on 11-14-25, DOES NOT COUNT AND IS VOID, because this case was already both 1) fraudulently transferred and 2) closed before I did so, which tolls any activity in it, and also due to my head spinning from agent MISREPRESENTATIONS, while it committing Fraud on the Court!
Certificate of Service:
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was placed into the case file.
Darryl Schneider Plaintiff
_________________________
Signature
10406 N 26 Street
Tampa, FL 33612
813-585-0552
Adverse Parties:
1. David Dawson II
732 Holly Terrace
Brandon, FL 33511-5416
2. TGH
c/o John Couris
5707 Bayshore Blvd.
Tampa, FL 33611
or
1 Tampa General Circle
c/o Risk Management
1 Davis Blvd.
Suite 402
Tampa, FL 33606
813-844-7000
3. City of Tampa
Risk Management
306 East Jackson Street
Suite 4-E
Tampa, FL 33602
813-274-8211
4. State of Florida
Florida Department of Financial Services Division of Risk Management
200 E. Gaines St.
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0338
850-413-3122
5. Alex Rothschild
c/o Rothschild & Co. US Inc.
1251 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10020
USA
212-403-3500
6. Federal Reserve Bank (FRB)
33 Liberty Street
New York, New York 10045
212-720-5000
In The 13th Judicial Circuit
Tampa, Florida Division
1. Darryl Schneider, Plaintiff
Case: 25-CA-11806
1. Alex Rothschild
Sued as an Individual
2. Victor Crist
Sued as an Individual
3. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Sued as a Corporation, Defendants
_________________________/
Amended Complaint on 12-8-25
1. Main Introduction:
Every statement in this complaint is unambiguous, and not only sum sufficiently believable to a reasonably prudent person on its face (“four corners” rule), but clearly proven as seen by reviewing the appendices. Any arguments pled in writing by any officer of the court, including the judge, NOT based on material evidence submitted, and used as a false means to dismiss this case, is an attempt to violate F.S. 838.022(a); (b); (c); 12.3173(e)(6) (same as Title, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817 – – 817.155 (tortious interference with state constitutional objectives, by obstructing the executive & judiciary with bribes). All the statements made in this complaint are relevant facts, written as SHORT AS POSSIBLE WITHOUT ARGUMENT, when there were rather large numbers of FRB contracted/paid retaliatory pubic and private agents, relentlessly out to injure both the Plaintiff and his wife!
2. All of the Defendants cited in this complaint, have sum sufficiently been proven guilty of having capably or intentionally participated in specific violations of either the: 1) RICO Act; 2) constitutional amendment rights; 3) state and federal statutes; 4) duty to render aid; or 4) state and federal common laws, which resulted in Mrs. Kimball’s death, either as an intentional or culpable tort (murder under F.S. 782.04(1)(a), or aggravated manslaughter under F.S. 782.07(1)). Unfortunately it cannot be determined which type of murder was committed on Mrs. Kimball and by whom, due to the concealment of 1) medical records and the 2) full FHP murder video, by respectively John Couris and State of Florida (SOF) through FHP.
***3. This is strictly an original jurisdiction, state case, to be only heard in state court, on only state violations of law. Defendants are only being sued on state law violations in this case, and are not to respond to any federal law violations cited! The citing of, not the judicial acting on, of federal law violations in state complaints is allowed. And all Defendants are technically citizens of Florida! This is not a diversity case, and only state statutory violations of law are cited within the count sections! State court is the MASTER PLAINTIFF’S jurisdictional choice for this case, and he alone chooses!
4. This complaint’s viewable online for more participants to become plaintiffs in class action lawsuits against the private FRB owners. The Corner Post, Inc. Vs. Federal Reserve case, proves private FRB owners do exist, and are allowed to be sued individually or through any one of their banking cartels they own as individual entities, used for racketeering purposes (FRB quasi-government or FRB commercial subsidiary banking investment corporations). Bozeman Financial LLC v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 955 F. 3D 971. The Federal Reserve Banks were established as chartered corporate instrumentalities (really a cartel of banking syndicates) of the United States under the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. See 12 U.S.C. § 221 et seq. Unlike the Postal Service, which was at issue in Return Mail, the Banks’s enabling statute, does not establish them as part of an executive agency, but rather each Bank is a “body corporate.” 12 U.S.C. §341. Like any other private corporation, the Banks each have a board of directors to enact bylaws and to govern the business of banking like corporations. But the FRB isn’t registered as a corporation within states, just merely as a cartel/organization/association-in-fact of banking syndicates. Moreover, the Bank may sue or be sued in “any federal court of law or equity.” The four elements of Rule 23(a) require a showing that: (1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable; (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class; (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; and (4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class. Plaintiffs may argue that the Supreme Court decision in Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co. (discussed in § 33 above) eases the requirements for certification of a RICO class. In Bridge, a RICO case that did not involve a class action, the Court held that a plaintiff asserting a RICO claim predicated on mail fraud, may be able to establish proximate cause without showing that the plaintiff relied on the alleged misrepresentations. However, the
circumstances of that case were unique because the plaintiff could show that it was directly
injured by fraud on which third-party government officials relied, as is the case in this matter committed by judges and cops (DHS & TPD). In this matter, government agents within local concerts, made up the frauds they commit themselves, with higher level government officials turning blind eyes. This government fraud requirement is met when judges within a circuit or district, commit honest services frauds using mail and/or wire misrepresentations, consequently their Imputed accessories after the fact (AATF) benefactors can be sued only in federal court (Title 12 U.S.C. §632) for non-compliance either in that state, or against the FRB headquarters directly (NY). The private FRB owners knowingly and intentionally use their banking corporations to transfer their private hot moneys to: This Court; Defendant Dawson’s State Farm Insurance Company as an FRB affiliate (see Appendix A); DHS; NCUA; TGH; SOF; and COT, as highly biased and illegal benefactor participants in this case, always involved in judicial court case scams, due to their contracted/paid/bribed judges under state governor orders to benefit them illegally at will, by approving conversion frauds and tortious interference scams on consumers within their courtrooms. Suing under the RICO Act, is NEVER a continuation of a prior lawsuit, but a new tort made possible by racketeering judges during prior court cases!
5. When the word bribed is stated in this complaint, it means: 1) Bribery under (Title 18, Chapter 96, Section 201); and 2) Extortion under (Section 1951); perpetrated to implement racketeering activities using hot moneys. And agent salaries and perks constitute as agreeable bribes, or forced extortions, depending on the amounts and force used in offering them, but both are used in making FRB agents comply in committing racketeering activities for their FRB benefactors, when these benefactors own and control the American money supply and most of the world’s businesses.
6. When Rothschild is used, it means Alex Rothschild and/or his Rothschild & Co.
***7. When syndicate is used, it means as stated as the word’s definition – – a group of individuals or organizations combined to promote some common interest, not a singular entity, like the FRB bank with its 12 branch offices!
8. When cartel is used, it means as stated as the word’s definition – – an association of manufacturers or suppliers with the purpose of maintaining prices at a high level and restricting competition, not a singular entity, like the FRB bank with its 12 branch offices!
9. When the FRB owners and their FRB affiliated commercial subsidiary banking investment corporations, fund; invest; and collect agency proceeds, with some of the hot loot coming from consumers’ laundered and misappropriated moneys owed (blood moneys) using FRB contracted/paid judges to turn a blind eye to conversion frauds and tortious interference scams, a RICO relationship is most DEFINITELY in place between benefactor FRB owners/controllers and their beneficiary subordinate judicial agents. So the 4 doctrines of law cited repeatedly within this complaint DEFINITELY apply.
10. Jurisdiction:
This court has subject matter jurisdiction to hear all of the Counts against all of the Defendants in this complaint based on either 1) their residential locations being within local courthouse limits and 2) all of the injuries having occurred within the same limits, or by 3) the Defendants doing business locally within Tampa, Florida limits. Where the injuries occurred, is the correct jurisdiction for all the Defendants to be sued in state court. Or in federal court pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C. Code §1331, as this action arises under federal laws too, specifically but not limited to: 18 U.S.C. §1346 (honest services frauds); 18 U.S.C. §§1341; 1343; (mail and wire frauds); and `U.S.C. §§1513 (retaliation against witnesses); and under Title 28, Chapter 190, Section 5001.
11. The focus of specific personal jurisdiction is on the defendant’s/company’s conduct within the forum state, and the lawsuit must arise from that conduct. Consequently, the defrauding of the Plaintiff and his wife in this matter, arose from the advantageous money making relationship the FRB and the other Defendants continue to have with each other, by way of hot funds/investments/bribes originating from the FRB, being reallocated/recycled as seen on FRB’s, TAS and IPAC debit/credit ledger transfer sheets within its supercomputers, inter-governmental transfers made to either Governor DeSantis, or directly to State of Florida agencies, along with intra-governmental state government monetary transfers/distributions to local public/private Florida based agencies/agents like Centene and Defendant Couris (Appendix A & D). All the different addresses/structures housing FRB contracted/paid/bribed agents, public/private, make up the one (1) illegal FRB enterprise operating as both an enterprise when investing moneys to acquire and interest in, for the control of, continued racketeering activities in the future, and as an association-in-fact enterprise operating together through mergers and acquisitions within FRB banking syndicates, for wider FRB reaching racketeering purposes. The FRB owners operate from within both types of enterprises.
***12. Relevant Statements of Fact concerning statute of limitation to file claims in this matter:
13. A statute of limitations doesn’t accrue in Florida until the injury is known (Florida’s Date of Discovery Rule). The Plaintiff didn’t know Mr. Kimball’s death was from either a culpable or intentional tort, committed by David Dawson II and his passenger, until sometime months after the Plaintiff’s false imprisonment had ended in mid-December of 2023, with the partial murder video obtained by email from FHP around March of 2024. This video was reviewed about two (2) months later (mid-2024) by an attorney who told the Plaintiff about the F.S. 316,130(9) violation. And right after this, investigator “Star” was paid by the Plaintiff to live on the streets of Brandon, Florida, who obtained the consensus that Mrs. Kimball was setup to be murdered on 8-19-23 for supposedly stealing street drugs from the local addicts. But the Plaintiff still doesn’t really know what rolls the many participants played in Mrs. Kimball’s murder, when he was denied the rest of the FHP murder video and her TGH medical records!
14. 2 years after the CAUSE of the Wrongful Death and Survival Action claims are discovered under Applicable F.S. 95.11(5)(c) – – the limitation of actions within this subsection shall be limited to the health care provider and persons in privity with the provider of health care (Mrs. Kimball). In those actions covered by this paragraph in which it can be shown that fraud, concealment, or intentional misrepresentation of fact prevented the discovery of the injury the period of limitations is extended forward 2 years from the time that the injury is discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence, but in no event to exceed 7 years from the date the incident giving rise to the injury occurred. This intentional tort offers the Plaintiff a statute of limitations of up to 7 years, with an additional 2 years after Mrs. Kimball’s medical records are disclosed. If TGH spoliated Mrs. Kimball’s medical records, Defendant TGH has another 4 years to be sued under F.S. 95.11(3)(n) when it’s determined it did so.
15. A 4 year statute of limitation applies: F.S. 95.11(3)(i) – – due to a legal or Equitable Action founded on FRAUD, such as having filed a complaint for Equitable Relief in state court (25-CA-8096) by a state court judge, and having it illegally transferred to federal court by FRB contracted/paid Defendant Crist, Clerk of the Court and Comptroller of the 13th Judicial Circuit, for the purpose of being illegally dismissed by federal court judge Thomas Barber the next day (case 25-CV-3077), when a notice of the Plaintiff dismissing the FRB from the state case (25-CA-8096) was given to Judge Barber before he illegally dismissing case 25-CV-3077. And four (4) of the defendants were already being sued in this same courthouse for federal violations under case 25-CV-2181, so Judge Barber had NO jurisdiction to do anything! His false order is VOID! This is an intentional tort with a 4 year statute of limitations, which applies to Defendant Crist as contracted/paid individual, working for the FRB in defrauding the Plaintiff in 11/2025.
16. 4 year statute of limitations: F.S. 95.11(3)(n) – – due to an action for assault, battery, false arrest, malicious prosecution, malicious interference, false imprisonment, or any other intentional tort, Defendants Dawson (individual); COT; SOF; TPD; Rothschild (individual); and Crist (individual) are being sued in this matter. The Plaintiff was Falsely Imprisoned until 12-13-23, consequently he had no knowledge of Mrs. Kimball’s murder until after he was released from jail. Under F.S. 95.11(3)(n), the four (4) year statute of limitations starts after 12-13-23.
17. Whoever, through culpable negligence, exposes another person to personal injury commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. Whoever, through culpable negligence, inflicts actual personal injury on another commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. And the statute of limitations starts to accrue, when the injury is discovered.
18. Complaint:
19. Statements of Fact in Mrs. Gloria Schneider’s 7-1-12 murder by her caregiver, which relevantly started the Plaintiff feud with John Rockefeller who’s the proximate cause of this complaint:
20. For at least 10 years prior to Gloria Schneider’s murder in 2012, her money was being laundered into Richard Murphy’s FRB pension fund by Richard, his wife Sybil and her sister Cyrie Schneider, Mrs. Schneider’s caregiver.
21. The Plaintiff married Mrs. Kimball in 2010, with her drug use making her an easy TPD agent cop target in public, for civil right violations. This forced the Plaintiff to protect his wife’s constitutional rights being violated as TPD sport, with FRB profits pouring in from her illegal court case fines; fees; and jail sentences, from the Plaintiff’s wallet!
22. Early in 2012, the Plaintiff made himself Mrs. Kimball’s guardian advocate for the purpose of giving her moral support and to stop the fleecing of his wife by FRB contracted/paid agent judges and cops, by having the right to stand up for her rights in criminal court, but Mrs. Kimball’s right to consent ALWAYS remained with her under during this advocacy program.
23. A few days later, the Plaintiff argued with HCSO Colonel James Previtera about his wife being given the wrong medications while in jail. James retaliated by sending his deputies to the Plaintiff’s house immediately to harass and intimidate him for days with their guns drawn.
24. The Plaintiff made complaints about James Previtera’s retaliatory actions above to both TPD and FDLE, which resulted in James being asked to leave HCSO (fired).
25. Right after this, Sheriff David Gee had the Plaintiff’s guardian advocacy illegally cancelled by Judge Isom, with everyone in the courtroom, other than the Plaintiff, stating Mrs. Kimball supposedly didn’t need a guardian against the FRB’s agent judges and cops.
26. After 7-1-12, the Plaintiff’s contested the false will drafted for his mother by probate attorney Robert Welker without her knowledge. Every probate attorney in town, even Robert Welker, stated Mrs. Schneider wasn’t alive long enough for her signed will to be valid when she died, no was murdered, 2 days after she signed a will solely acquired by her caregiver. Mrs. Schneider was never taken to a doctor the last year of her life; denied her antibiotics for pneumonia; lied to about what she had medically wrong with her; and left for dead after signing the false will.
27. Relevant Statements of Fact after Mrs. Schneider’s murder:
28. From 2012 to 2019, the Plaintiff fought with trial and appellate judges to 1) have his mother’s culpable or intentional murder investigated, and to 2) reverse the conversion and interference scams committed on his mother by respectively the Murphys and their attorneys, but to no avail.
29. Case 20-CV-78 was filed, NOT as a rendition of the local court case fights with the Murphys for committing conversion frauds and implementing tortious interference scams through their attorneys, but as a bona fide RICO Act complaint, due to the judges and opposing counsels having combined forces to commit honest services frauds on the Plaintiff, financially saving their benefactor John Rockefeller and his FRB, by keeping Gloria Schneider’s stolen loot in Richard Murphy’s pension funds, held by FRB commercial subsidiary banking syndicates for McDonald Douglas and Lockheed Martin.
30. In early to mid-2020, John Rockefeller was phoned by the Plaintiff numerous times to resolve the matter. What was stated is cited in the Rockefeller letters (Appendix A).
31. Throughout 2021, the Plaintiff’s wife had a total of $1,600 of her SSI money converted into the pockets of her neighbors, by their having drugged her, with Mayor Jane Castor from COT and Stephanie Banks (ironic last name) from social security contacted.
32. In late 2021, Agent Mark Braswell from DHS, was not acting in accordance with DHS’s standard Blue Campaign management plans; policies; and operational procedures (mandates and policies), so the Plaintiff is currently suing DHS in federal court for its illegal involvement in also causing his injuries: 1) The Plaintiff’s email service provider, mail.com, called him on his phone, stating that someone at the DHS office in Orlando, Florida was trying really hard for days to log into his email account. 2) A month later, this same agent was pounding on the Plaintiff’s front door with a letter addressed to him, which demanded the Plaintiff to stop calling the local social security manager, Stephanie Banks, about reimbursing his wife for her stolen SSI moneys (Appendix B). This was a ruse because the Plaintiff had stopped contacting Ms. Banks two (2) months prior. 3) While at the Plaintiff’s home, this agent started knocking on neighbors’ doors to obtain any gossip about Mrs. Kimball. 4) A couple weeks later, DCF was pounding at Mrs. Kimball’s door to investigate a complaint this same agent had made to them about the Plaintiff supposedly having STRUCK his wife, not about human trafficking (see the DCF reports in Appendix B). The Plaintiff was asked by DCF why a false complaint was made by a DHS agent, but he couldn’t answer the question. 5) A week later, this same agent started leaving voicemail and text messages on the Plaintiff’s phone, not about Mrs. Kimball, but about his FRB scammed inheritance, due to John Rockefeller’s joint venture pension funds through Lockheed Martin and McDonald Douglas (see Appendix E video). 6) A month later, a confidential law enforcement friend of the Plaintiff, advised him that a DHS agent was talking to TPD’s chief of police, Brian Dugan, about DHS wanting the Plaintiff illegally arrested and charged with human trafficking of his wife. 7) A month after filing a Writ of Mandamus on Ronald DeSantis in 2025 (Appendix A), with the video of agent Braswell included, the Plaintiff received a voice mail message from Agent Braswell screaming his first name, and then disconnecting the call. See Appendix B.
33. No probable cause was made to search or arrest the Plaintiff on 2-24-22, based on material evidence in violation of any Florida statute, or a conversation with competent Mrs. Kimball beforehand, just an Amazon purchased port-a-potty with liners was used as a ploy to illegally obtain a search warrant and arrest the Plaintiff on, which TPD subordinate agent cops called a bucket, and a good bust (Appendix B).
34. At the local Tampa Bay courthouse on the morning of 2-23-22, a bogus search warrant was obtained by local FRB contracted/paid/bribed TPD cops before any conversation with competent Mrs. Kimball, using no material evidence of a crime committed (bona fide material evidence to a crime committed, is MISSING from case file 22-CF-2324-A).
35. At the local courthouse in the afternoon of 2-23-22, Mrs. Kimball was FRB agent cop (TPD) browbeaten on courthouse audio/video, in a secured backroom, in front of her attorney, Marc Joseph, during case 21-CF-006147-A, while the conversation was also TPD agent cop recorded (bona fide material evidence).
36. Mrs. Kimball was against her will, made to speak with TPD agent cops, or be arrested and charged with a made up crime, while one of them dangled handcuffs in her face (bona fide material evidence on audio/video).
37. Mrs. Kimball made NO incriminating statements against the Plaintiff, the topic of the conversation, so then an FRB contracted/paid/bribed agent prosecutor working for Andrew Warren, offered her attorney a commonly used FRB BRIBE to nolle process her felony charge, if she’d allow FRB agent cops to take her to another location. This was done to 1) desperately obtain any evidence for legally arresting the Plaintiff on the next day and 2) to keep Mrs. Kimball from going home, so cops would have an easier time illegally arresting her husband (bona fide material evidence in case files 22-CF-2324-A & 21-CF-006147-A).
38. In the evening of 2-23-22, Mrs. Kimball was unknowingly taken to TPD agent, Corporal Crystal Shiver’s HOME, and pressured for, what the Plaintiff was told by his wife was overnight, to talk about her husband with further rewards promised. Then she was taken to a federal FRB funded half-way house, told she couldn’t go home, and periodically browbeaten for 3 weeks while being audio recorded (bona fide material evidence MISSING from case files 22-CF-2324-A & 21-CF-006147-A). See Appendix B.
39. On 2-24-22, TPD agents showed up at Mrs. Kimball’s residence with a bogus search warrant for the property, obtained without any material evidence provided to local Judge Twine of a crime committed. This warrant basically stated FRB agent cops had the right to look for evidence of abuse and neglect committed by a caregiver under Florida Chapter 825, as though Mrs. Kimball was disabled under Florida Chapter 825, when she wasn’t! When cops were finished searching, all they found were stools in the family port-a-potty, with the Plaintiff being illegally charged with neglect as though a port-a-potty was illegal and he was a caregiver under Florida Chapter 825, who supposedly forced his wife to use their port-a-potty, along with theft/exploitation, also under Florida Chapter 825, as though Mrs. Kimball didn’t have the capacity for consenting to her husband protecting her properties (ID & food stamp cards found in his wallet). So Mrs. Kimball was supposedly incompetent, because a wife would supposedly never let her husband pick up groceries at the store for her! The Plaintiff married Sandra Kimball before she started receiving SSI benefits and always tried to keep her from spending her money or trading her belongings, like her food stamp card and ID, for street drugs. If the Plaintiff hadn’t done this, and knowing his constitutional rights aren’t worth a damn in America, complements of the FRB owners, he would’ve probably been charged with aiding and abetting in his wife’s drug use and murder! DEVILS! Mrs. Kimball was NEVER disabled under Florida Chapter 825, because she had NO permanent mental or physical disability classifying her as either mentally incompetent or physically impaired! According to social security, Mrs. Kimball suffered from manic depressive bipolar disorder, due to years of street drug use, which left her with a non-permanent nervous condition that social security tested for every 2 years to confirm she still couldn’t work because of it, but was competent when on her medications, not street drugs (bona fide material evidence in Appendix C).
40. Mrs. Kimball was her own representative payee (RP) for her SSI benefits, which were deposited into her own bank account! And the Plaintiff was never anyone’s caregiver! Mrs. Kimball never had a caregiver due to never needing one! This is evident when NO material evidence of: 1) The Plaintiff ever being a caregiver; 2) the Plaintiff ever stealing Mrs. Kimball’s benefits, or abusing her physically or mentally; nor 3) Mrs. Kimball being incompetent, was ever produced by SOF/COT/TPD agents in case 22-CF-2324-A! No judge in 25 years of Mrs. Kimball being arrested for drug use, ever brought up competency issues! Mental evaluations were only ordered by judges on Mrs. Kimball, after her attorney intelligently brought up the subject to fool prosecutors and the legal system into dismissing her MISDEMEANOR charges a half dozen times before 2021 (bona fide material evidence held by Attorney Alex Stavrou), due to Mrs. Kimball really being temporality blitzed half the time on street drugs. Mrs. Kimball suffered from severe momentary depression, and needed either medications or street drugs to stop her from having these reoccurring episodes. Unfortunately her medications weren’t sufficient all of the time.
41. Mrs. Kimball was NOT incompetent when she needed to pass competency evaluations, and did so during three (3) of them (bona fide material evidence in case 21-CF-006147-A) (Appendix C), with Attorney Marc Joseph as a witness! The Plaintiff can honestly testify to his wife showing more basic knowledge, logic and good sense, when off street drugs and on her medications, than he ever did!
42. All of the incriminating statements made, not only in the arrest affidavit, but throughout case 22-CF-2324-A, are COT/TPD/SOF agent made up, originating possibly from the Plaintiff’s neighbors residing kitty-corner from him at 10407 N 25 Street, Tampa, FL 33612, retaliating against him due to his phone calls to FRB agent cops, made about their illegal activities. Consequently, FRB agent cops intentionally lied to Judge Twine about the validity of their oral/written statements, when they had NO material evidence to support this judge granting them a search warrant on the Plaintiff’s house. The bogus search warrant was needed, so cops would be able to search for anything illegal they could find to legally charge the Plaintiff with, AFTER illegally arresting him! (desired FRB/DHS/COT/TPD agent cop goal with hindsight being 20/20).
43. The false imprisonment of the Plaintiff and the murder of Mrs. Kimball:
44. The Plaintiff and his wife were represented by Attorney Matthew Kimball McDowell during case 22-CF-2324-A, who told the Plaintiff that his wife COULD live at home, as it was a gray area of law which allowed both him and his wife to live at the same property, due to the no contact order only being on the Plaintiff, with the property solely owned by him. So the Plaintiff technically didn’t have to leave when his wife was home.
45. In mid-2023, the prosecution found out about Mrs. Kimball’s living arrangement and illegally arrested the Plaintiff 2 more times for his wife’s presence at her house, with Judge Goudie NOT granting the Plaintiff bail, and with Fox News at 5 airing false information about the Plaintiff on TV, so he was forced to plead out, or be injured by inmates. The second time TPD found the Plaintiff’s wife at her house, the Plaintiff was jailed for 4.5 months using a bogus TPD search warrant with planted items used to arrest with his wife murdered on the streets!
46. How the 4 doctrines of law cited throughout this complaint are applicable in this matter:
47. Imputation and subsequently acquiescing in, by not implementing the appropriate corrective measures after having knowingly benefited by a fraud, keeps all wrong doers on the hook for both PRIOR and FUTURE damages!
48. The Law of Agency establishes a set of rules for determining when, in relation to third parties, an agent’s conduct or knowledge should be imputed to his or her principal. See Restatement (Third) of Agency §§2.01 – 2.04, 5.03 (2006). For example, in transactions with third parties, an agent’s conduct will be imputed to the principal, if the agent acted with actual or apparent authority (attorney/client relationship), or if the principal ratified the agent’s conduct. See Fergus v. Ross, 477 Mass. 563, 566-568, 79 N. E. 3d 421 (2017). See also Restatement (Third) of Agency, supra at §§2.01 – 2.03, 4.02.
49. In the realm of torts, the tortious conduct committed by an agent in the scope of his or her agency, will be imputed to the principal under a theory of Respondeat Superior. See Lev v. Beverly Enters.-Mass., Inc., 457 Mass. 234, 238, 929 N.E. 2d 303 (2010). See also Restatement (Third) of Agency, supra at § 2.04. Knowledge that an agent acquires in the scope of his or her employment can also be imputed to the principal. See Sunrise Props., Inc. v. Bacon, Wilson, Ratner, Cohen, Salvage, Fialky & Fitzgerald, P.C., 425 Mass. 63, 66-67, 679 N.E. 2d 540 (1997). See also Restatement (Third) of Agency, supra at § 5.03. Merrimack Coll. v. KPMG LLP, 480 Mass. 614, 108 N. E. 3d 430, 438 (2018).
50. The result of imputation is that the principal bears the legal consequences of the agent’s conduct. Thus, if an agent with actual or apparent authority enters into a contract with a third party, the principal will be bound by that contract. See, e.g., Linkage Corp. v. Trustees of Boston Univ., 425 Mass. 1, 4, 17, 679 N. E. 2d 191, cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1015, 118 S. Ct. 599, 139 L. Ed. 2d 488 (1997) (university bound by agreement signed by vice-president where vice-president had apparent authority).
51. If an agent negligently injures a third party while acting within the scope of the agency, the principal will be held vicariously liable for that negligence. See, e.g., Dias v. Brigham Med. Assocs., Inc., 438 Mass. 317, 323, 780 N. E. 2d 447 (2002) (corporation could be held vicariously liable for alleged medical malpractice of its physician-employee). Merrimack Coll. v. KPMG LLP, 480 Mass. 614, 108 N. E. 3d 430, 438 (2018). Imputation serves various functions. It creates incentives for principals to choose their agents wisely. See Restatement (Third) of Agency, supra at § 5.03 comment b, at 360. It also encourages principals to supervise their agents and to share information with them. Id. The ultimate purpose behind these rules of imputation, however, is to fairly allocate risks between principals and innocent third parties. As explained in Kansallis Fin. Ltd. v. Fern, 421 Mass. 659, 664-665, 659 N. E. 2d 731 (1996).
52. Kansallis:
“Standing behind [the] diverse concepts of vicarious liability is a principle that helps to rationalize them. This is the principle that as between two innocent parties — the principal-master and the third party — the principal-master who for his own purposes, places another in a position to do harm to a third party, should bear the loss. A principal who requires an agent to transact his business, and can only get that business done, if third parties deal with the agent as if with the principal, cannot complain if the innocent third party suffers loss by reason of the agent’s act. Similarly, the master who must put an instrument into his servant’s hands in order to get his business done … must also bear the loss, if the servant causes harm to a stranger in the use of that instrument as the business is transacted.” (Citations omitted.) Merrimack Coll. v. KPMG LLP, 480 Mass. 614, 108 N. E. 3d 430, 438 (2018).
53. Vicarious Liability under the Respondeat Superior Doctrine: “Qui Facit per alium facit per se”, i.e., he who acts through others, acts through himself. And “respondeat superior”, i.e., let the master be liable. A master (owner/controller) is primarily liable for the actions of his or her hired servants.
54. Statements of Fact about Defendant Dawson II:
55. While the Plaintiff was in jail until 12/2023, Defendant Dawson, who was driving his car at 3:40am on 8-19-23, purposely overtook a parked car next to a visible crosswalk within an intersection with a traffic light, without slowing down and struck Mrs. Kimball, a pedestrian within a visible crosswalk, a violation of F.S. 316.130(9), and never got out of his car to see what he could do to help, nor did he call in the emergency to 911, a violation of his duty to render aid under F.S. 316.062. Thus a culpable or intentional tort was committed by David Dawson by striking Mrs. Kimball illegally with his car.
56. FHP still refuses to provide the full video of the homicide to the victim’s spouse, without having done a mandatory drug screening of Defendant Dawson at the time of the homicide (see report in Appendix A). It’s still undetermined if Dawson was culpably or intentionally negligent when he struck Mrs. Kimball with his car hard without slowing down, as if he was trying to murder her.
57. Defendant Dawson clearly overtook a vehicle parked at a stop light, in front of a crosswalk, a violation of F.S. 316.130(9) – – Whenever any vehicle is stopped at a marked crosswalk, or at any unmarked crosswalk at an intersection, to permit a pedestrian to cross the roadway, the driver of any other vehicle approaching from the rear, shall not overtake and pass such stopped vehicle! This reads exactly on par with what the video footage of Mrs. Kimball’s homicide shows! This intentional, or culpable, negligence on the part of Defendant Dawson, resulted in at least the aggravated manslaughter (statutorily cited later on in the Counts section) of Mrs. Kimball (capable negligence is aggravated manslaughter, which is a type of murder)! At this point it’s speculative as to what Defendant Dawson was doing at 3:40pm on a Saturday morning, driving at a high speed. This speculation became highly alarming to the Plaintiff, when FHP failed to conduct MANY of its mandatory statutory duties right after the homicide as State of Florida mandated policies. Part of the homicide can be watched from a partial clip in Appendix E.
58. The Plaintiff hired credible investigator “Star” to determine, if Defendant Dawson was negligent, or deliberate, when he CRIPPLED Mrs. Kimball with his car (see homicide report Appendix A). According to A) hearsay witness testimony, along with B) FHP having intentionally violated both the Plaintiff and his wife’s state and federal 14th amendment rights; and state and federal mandatory statutory duty to properly investigate a homicide, by doing a drug screening and review of the full video obtained for criminal/racketeering activities, with the spouse NOT being given a copy of everything FHP obtained; and to MAINTAIN its standard management plans; policies; and operational procedures during both the homicide and in case 24-CA-7358, but intentionally failed to: 1) Apply required F.S. 316.103(9) to its homicide report; 2) do a mandatory drug screening of Defendant Dawson at the scene of the homicide (very suspicious FHP violation of homicide procedures (pre-spoliation of evidence)); 3) correct its false homicide report which wrongly states Mrs. Kimball was at fault while in the crosswalk (Appendix B), thus WRONGLY stating she caused the accident (very suspicious when pedestrians have the right of way, and under F.S. 316.130(9); 4) concealed/spoliated the rest of the murder video, part of which was inadvertently provided to the Plaintiff (hindsight 20/20), so A) no one else could determine who jump out of Defendant Dawson’s car right after the homicide and ran off (as stated by witness Brandon Santiago cited in the FHP’s homicide report); or B) who was chasing/luring Mrs. Kimball into the crosswalk (very suspicious); and C) who had been stalking Mrs. Kimball for hours the morning of 8-19-23; and 5) intentionally having its attorney in case 24-CA-7358, blatantly state FHP spoliated the homicide video to conceal the rest of it, when it’s MANDATORY for FHP to keep complete video tapes on all homicides, as stated to the Plaintiff in mid-2025, by Tampa based Lt. Eric French, FHP (extremely suspicious)! The manager of the Take 5 oil change shop which made the video, stated to the Plaintiff that an FHP officer had downloaded a full days’ worth of the video!
59. These facts along with credible testimony from a couple of shop owners and a dozen homeless witnesses working/living in the immediate vicinity of Mrs. Kimball’s homicide (not material evidence, but a good start for obtaining more), all stated to both the Plaintiff and his investigator, they either had personal knowledge of who murdered Mrs. Kimball and why it was committed, but were too scared to give the details, or heard credible hearsay information that the car driver (Defendant Dawson) who caused the homicide (3:40am on 8-19-23), was a drug dealer/runner working out of another location in west Brandon, Florida for covertness, who had a known drug pusher/distributor in his car at the time, who were both looking to injure Mrs. Kimball (first or second degree murder) for supposedly stealing drugs from the pusher, as well as from his local buyers/users for months. Credible witnesses recently told the Plaintiff they tried to keep Mrs. Kimball hidden the night she was murdered, so she couldn’t be found by Defendant Dawson and his passenger! At this point, Defendant Dawson should’ve already had his driving privileges suspended for illegally mowing Mrs. Kimball down with his car, a violating F.S. 316.103(9)!
60. Since a murder occurred, and FHP’s a department within the State of Florida (SOF), there’s no statute of limitations in suing SOF, or one of its employees, for intentionally covering up the murder video by spoliation, for the FULL recoverable damage amounts in this case, through its benefactor the FRB, with the deepest pockets, currently being sued in state court!
61. Relevant Statements of Fact about Tampa General Hospital for spoliation of evidence and Fraud on the Court committed:
62. TGH, along with its owner John Couris, knowingly and intentionally denied Mrs. Kimball’s spouse her TGH medical records, when a personal representative has never been appointed in this matter, a violation of F.S. 395.3025(1). John Couris was directly notified in early 2025, that Mrs. Kimball’s spouse, a reasonably prudent person, believed she had been murdered by his funding source, the FRB, due to the Plaintiff threatening to sue the FRB through John Rockefeller. A letter directly sent to John Rockefeller in 2020, with a copy of the 2025 Rockefeller letter, both in Appendix A, was sent to Mr. Couris, who’s now at least an accessory after the fact (AATF) in either the culpable, or intentional, murder of Mrs. Kimball by Defendant Dawson, but it’s still unknown if John Couris didn’t in fact intentionally cause Mrs. Kimball’s death as a benefit to his FRB funding source through TGH, thus also assisting in the murder of Mrs. Kimball, with her TGH medical records possibly spoliated as stated in case 24-CA-7358, as a misrepresentation used to cover-up TGH’s involvement in Mrs. Kimball’s murder.
63. TGH is an AATF in at least the aggravated manslaughter of Mrs. Kimball, by covering up her medical details to benefit itself; its funding and investing source the FRB; and Dawson. John Couris screwed up when he failed to provide Mrs. Kimball’s medical records, after he was directly notified of her being murdered, at least as an F.S. 782.07(1) violation. Now TGH is being correctly sued for Mrs. Kimball’s medical records being technically spoliated (concealed or destroyed). And the statute of limitation on wrongful death demands that TGH continue to be sued for wrongful death to preserve the filing date, because it fraudulently spoliated Mrs. Kimball’s medical records!
64. The Plaintiff is suing TGH due to John Couris’ many law violations: 1) He covered up the details of Mrs. Kimball’s murder, by tortiously interfering in the Plaintiff obtaining Mrs. Kimball’s medical records directly from TGH, starting in the beginning of 2024 (Appendix A); and by having 2) hired attorneys to misrepresent the facts in court as an accessory after the fact in Mrs. Kimball’s murder during court case 24-CA-7358, when he knew beforehand Mrs. Kimball was probably murdered (no court ruling of murder needs to be made on this subject to civilly sue for murder.
65. John Couris is being sued through TGH for knowingly and intentionally stopping TGH from providing the Plaintiff with his wife’s medical records, a violation of F.S. 395.3025(1) (Appendix A). John Couris had his attorneys brazenly lie in court case 24-CA-7358, stating that the Plaintiff couldn’t have Mrs. Kimball’s TGH medical records, because he wasn’t married to her in 2010, for their marriage license not being on file with Hillsborough County’s, Clerk of the Court, until after her death! A total bull chip lie! What’s John Couris been hiding for 2 years?
66. John Couris also tortiously interfered with the Plaintiff’s expectancy to obtain his murdered wife’s medical records in a timely fashion from TGH, starting in the beginning of 2024, now considered spoliated evidence (mandatory court sanction required, if he doesn’t produce the records after this case is officially open)! And John Couris will be in violation of U.S. Code § 1519 (destruction, alteration, or falsification of records), if he no longer has them!
67. It’s probable that John Couris through TGH committed culpable or intentional wrongful death on Mrs. Kimball using his TGH agents, a violation of both Florida Statutes 768.16 (wrongful death); and 46.021 (survival action claim for 3.5 days of suffering), because of the spoliation/concealment of Mrs. Kimball’s TGH medical records as an AATF in her murder. If this is later found to be incorrect, the Plaintiff will amend his complaint and delete these Counts, but you cannot add them to this complaint after 2 years, so these Counts have to stay with TGH until after discovery. John Couris’ fault for not providing the records.
68. John Couris committed a compounding offense after tortiously interfering in the Plaintiff obtaining his wife’s medical records, which also makes him at least an AATF to whoever was the proximate cause of her death. It consists of three (3) basic elements: (1) knowledge of the crime (direct notice was given to both Governor DeSantis and John Couris, cited in Appendix A); (2) the agreement not to prosecute or inform (Mrs. Kimball’s medical records were withheld or destroyed (spoliated)) by the illegal participation/involvement of both DeSantis and Couris, respectively cases 25-CV-564 & 24-CA-7358); and (3) the receipt of consideration – – continued state funding to TGH from the FRB through DeSantis; Medicaid; and USF, for the purpose of continuing to have TGH SAVE the FRB from indirectly having to pay the Plaintiff, and possibly other consumers, restitution/compensation through TGH. The offense is concluded when there’s an agreement to either withhold evidence of the crime, conceal it, or fail to prosecute it. “English common law states: The “crime of compounding” is committed when a perpetrator, prosecutor, any other official or another person enters into an agreement with the victim of a crime or an official, whereby some, or other benefits, are transferred between the parties in order to stop, withdraw or alter the reporting or prosecution of an offense,” explains Charles De Meillon, Florida Chapter 843, Obstructing Justice 843.14 – – Compounding Felony. The Plaintiff had one Defendant complain because he cited criminal statutes in his state complaint. The Plaintiff can’t sue under any criminal statute. But he can show all of the RELEVANT law violations which resulted in his personal injuries. If the Plaintiff can have his mug shot all over the Internet because of John Rockefeller, he can accurately state what real criminal violations his agents committed during this matter!
69. John Couris is also being sued under Title 18, Chapter 96, Sections 1961(1)A & B; specifically Section 1341 (paper by mail used in knowingly and intentionally giving out misinformation of the facts in court case 24-CA-7358, about the Plaintiff not being married to Mrs. Kimball); Section 1343 (wire by Internet used in knowingly and intentionally giving out misinformation of the facts in court case 24-CA-7358 about the Plaintiff not being married to Mrs. Kimball), resulting in Fla. Stat. §838.022(a);(b);&(c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; under F.S. 895, violations – – TGH committed honest services fraud, by not providing Mrs. Kimball’s medical records to the Plaintiff, as well as being an accomplice to the FRB’s contracted/paid/bribed judge in case 24-CA-7358 doing the same.
70. John Couris is guilty of letting either a culpable or intentional tort committed at his hospital stand, after the Plaintiff directly notified him of Mrs. Kimball’s being murdered! This makes John Couris either an AATF, or before the fact (ABTF) as an accomplice in the murder of Mrs. Kimball, DURING HER STAY AT TGH, depending on what’s in her TGH medical records the Plaintiff still doesn’t have! By 2) John Couris continuing to aid and abet the FRB (a source of funding for TGH, by tortiously interfering with the Plaintiff obtaining his wife’s medical records, after being directly imputed by the Plaintiff to stop doing so when she was murdered (Appendix A), John Couris is now at least an AATF to whoever was the proximate cause of her death! Since hindsight’s 20/20, John Couris’ actions/inactions (omissions) after being imputed with the facts in this matter early this year (his letter contained a copy of the 2025 Rockefeller letter referenced in Appendix A), he’s aided and abetted in the cover-up of Mrs. Kimball’s murder as an AATF, either on the street, or at his hospital! The million dollar question is did Defendant Couris aid and abet FRB agents in purposely ending Mrs. Kimball’s life? Due to the spoliation of evidence under Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.380(b)(2), makes both Couris and TGH, at least accessories after the fact in her aggravated manslaughter committed by the rest of the Defendants and their concert members. You lose the evidence, you pay for the crime as if you committed it!
71. John Couris’ actions/inactions (omissions) during case 24-CA-7358, continue to injure the Plaintiff and maximize FRB funds officially remaining with TGH, an FRB funded and invested in corporation (Appendix A), in a two (2) step, multitier judicially implemented, tortious interference scam (case 24-CA-7358) to misappropriate Mrs. Kimball’s medical records owed to the Plaintiff – – medical records illegally allowed by FRB contracted/paid/bribed judges in cases 24-CA-7358 and 25-CA-564, to ultimately be hospital kept/spoliated, which profits the FRB in NOT having to compensate/reimburse its TGH business affiliate for any medical malpractice or hospital regulation violation committed, but also by the rest of the FRB funded/invested in Defendants who technically murdered her too, not having to pay restitution, amounting to a huge amount of FRB SAVINGS.
72. Both Defendant Couris and his hospital, which technically spoliated (concealed/destroyed) Mrs. Kimball’s medical records, are liable for her wrongful death, because of: 1) The spoliation committed, and 2) the competent hearsay testimony from a unbiased TGH emergency room nurse, who imparted to the Plaintiff, both TGH and its owner, John Couris, were vicarious liable in NOT adhering to professional hospital standards! These standards amounted to having a board certified neurosurgeon available in the morning hours of 8-19-23, or getting one in FAST! You don’t let a person going unconscious with a head injury go untreated for long, or his or her head will swell up with fluid, and their brain DIES! These standards are violated when a hospital intern such as a residing USF doctor, completing his or her residency at TGH, wrongly/illegally acts as a board certified neurosurgeon. Consequently, TGH and/or its owners can be held accountable for not having one available to perform a needed surgery quickly and correctly after admitting a patient! This liability applies to issues of inadequate staffing, or insufficient training, for handling an emergency, like when the one (1) main TGH board certified neurosurgeon is needed, but has the weekend OFF and some other staff member makes a BAD decision! It’s the Plaintiff choice to either sue TGH or the owner, and there’s no doubt whatsoever Defendant Couris is intentionally/culpably negligent when he needs to racketeer with the FRB’s controller in Florida (Governor DeSantis), for FRB savings/retaliation purposes (Appendix A)! Hindsight in this matter is 20/20!
73. So according to competent hearsay testimony from TGH, by it not having performed Mrs. Kimball’s lifesaving procedure in time, or at least pulled in a board certified neurosurgeon quickly, or had its helicopter team transport her to another hospital with a competent board certified neurosurgeon waiting on hand to immediately perform the procedure, one who finished his or her neurosurgeon residency, Mrs. Kimball’s NOW DEAD! Consequently, if what the nurse above stated is true, Defendant Couris is at least vicariously, no intentionally, liable for Mrs. Kimball’s wrongful death, due to really being an AATF, AFTER having been imputed by the Plaintiff of his wife having been murdered, but still isn’t the proximate cause of damages, the FRB is! To find out how John Couris and his hospital were involved in Mrs. Kimball’s murder, all of her TGH medical records need to be reviewed!
74. Relevant Statements of Fact about City of Tampa (COT):
75. COT agent cops (TPD), obtained a false search warrant of Mrs. Kimball’s house in the morning of 2-23-22, without providing any physical evidence of a violation of Florida statute, as indicated from the warrant used to search (see Appendix B). TPD interrogated Mrs. Kimball in the afternoon of 2-23-22 in front of her attorney Marc Joseph, and threatened her when she stated that she didn’t want to talk to them, with ultimately COT/TPD having to offer her a bribe to dismiss her felony case with an 18 month sentence in prison, if she allowed them to take her to an unknown place, thus illegally keeping her from going home as planned for 1.5 years (2-23-22 to 8-21-23), while further interrogating her for 3 weeks without any crime having been committed, as evident from referencing cases 22-CF-2324-A and 21-CF-006147-A. DHS’s involvement in this matter was to involve COT; and SOF as concert members, for FRB retaliatory purposes. Without obtaining any information from Mrs. Kimball of a crime committed by her husband the Plaintiff, TPD illegally searched her house on 2-24-22, committed theft; conversion; and destruction of her and her husband’s properties (case 22-CF-2324-A photos show a trashed house, not from the Plaintiff or his wife, but from COT/TPD agent cops).
76. The results of this search yielded no sign of Mrs. Kimball being abused or neglected by anyone, as confirmed by one of the TPD agent cops who executed the bogus search warrant, later deposed by Attorney McDowell, recorded on film, and viewable in Appendix E! On 2-24-22, TPD agent cops wrongly arrested and charged the Plaintiff with both neglect and theft under Florida Chapter 825, which entails crimes against adults having either a permanent mental or physical disabilities of the magnitude to be easily exploited. Mrs. Kimball being blitzed on street drugs most of the time, doesn’t count. So she wasn’t disabled under this statute!
77. Because TPD found stools in the family’s legally owned and operated port-a-potty, it wrongly claimed that, by Mrs. Kimball using a port-a-potty made for human waste (see a photo of in Appendix D), not a flushing toilet, the Plaintiff had somehow abused his wife under Chapter 825. COT; and Jane Castor; through TPD agent cops; were instrumental in initially railroading the Plaintiff onto SOF, so Jane Castor’s entire local concert could keep the Plaintiff’s wife from going home, due to the type of bogus charges TPD agent cops filed on him. And due to the illegal arrangement DHS had with COT/TPD/SOF, all accomplices in Jane Castor’s local concert, with all of these agencies/agents knowing no crime was committed by the Plaintiff in case 22-CF-2324-A.
78. COT/TPD agent cops starting on 2-23-22, Mrs. Kimball was shown the streets by them, with nowhere to go and where Attorney Matthew Kimball McDowell found her 3 month later in Pinellas County Florida, living and sleeping on CONCRETE without her medications! If Mrs. Kimball was really COT/TPD’s witness they were trying to protect, where was the evidence given to them by Mrs. Kimball before or after the Plaintiff’s arrest to prove a crime was committed by him? It certainly wasn’t placed into case 22-CF-2324-A. If after Mrs. Kimball having given SOF through COT/TPD, NO testimony it could use to prosecute the Plaintiff with (no affidavit signed, or audio/video filed in case 22-CF-2324-A, incriminating the Plaintiff in any Florida statute violation), and both SOF; and COT/TPD knew Mrs. Kimball was disabled and in need of her medications, which her attorney Matthew Kimball McDowell provided to her on the streets only once, multiple state and city agents, like Jane Castor; Andrew Warren; Susan Lopez; Lynn Goudie; and Mellissa Grajales, are at least culpably negligent in her aggravated manslaughter (MURDER), by intentionally violating the survival action statute (F.S. 46.021), to intentionally keep her on the streets with the false no contact order on her husband still in place! This was done to both aggravate the Plaintiff and to keep arresting him every time COT/TPD found his wife at home.
79. I n this case, all state entities (municipalities and employees) are being sued in state court for any one of their employees having committed a negligent or intentionally tort, while acting within the scope of his or her employment which 1) breached a state government policy. And they’re also being sued in federal court for having 2) implemented a state government policy in violation of their duty to the public under the U.S. Constitution. The plaintiff is suing COT in federal court under, but not limited to the following: 1) Title 28, Chapter 190, Section 5001; 2) (Title 18, Chapter 13, U.S. Codes § 241); 3) Title 42, Chapter 21, Section 1983; and 4) Title 18, Chapter 13, U.S. Code § 241. Punitive damages and attorney’s fees are owed for common law frauds and breaches of fiduciary duties to the public by municipalities. “A public official, acts as trustee for the citizens and the State … and thus owes the normal fiduciary duties of a trustee, e.g., honesty and loyalty to them.” United States v. Kincaid-Chauncey, 556 F. 3d 923, 939 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting United States v. Silvano, 812 F. 2d 754, 759 (1st Cir. 1987) and United States v. Mandel, 591 F. 2d 1347, 1363 (4th Cir. 1979) (internal quotation marks omitted)).
80. Defendant COT/TPD working together in concert with SOF, with joint and several liability applicable, due to intentional fraud committed, were in violation of the Plaintiff’s 4th and 5th state and federal amendment rights, while being falsely searched; arrested; imprisoned; maliciously prosecuted; and wrongly processed by the court system during case 22-CF-2324-A, when no crime was committed by anyone except Jane Castor’s local concert. This was accomplished by the wrongful actions of Jane Castor instructing TPD agent cops working for COT. Both the Plaintiff and his wife were clearly injured by COT starting on 2-23-2022, using TPD officers while they worked in their official capacities, but were adhering to a different set of DHS Blue Campaign, management plans, polices and operating procedures, under a different and illegal, non-standard set of operating requirements, due to Jane Castor being technically the director of COT. The Blue Campaign, see Appendix A, was originally, and still is, for stopping the migration of immigrant slave laborers into America (typically Cuba and South America). It’s always been an informational and educational program to inform local law enforcement agencies what to look for, not for DHS to get involved in to the point of knowingly and intentionally violating DHS policies, due to having participated directly in illegal arrests, thus breaching human and civil rights it was supposedly trying to uphold for illegal aliens. During the latter part of 2021, DHS had specific mandatory operating requirements for informing local law enforcement agencies on how to identify and implement DHS’s Blue Campaign on violators, not to participate in doing so itself! DHS crossed the line, by conducting an unwarranted investigation on local Americans Mrs. Kimball and her husband, which resulted in him being falsely imprisoned for 225 days, with his wife suffering on the streets for 1.5 years until murdered, due to the no contact order illegally placed on the Plaintiff, initiated by DHS through Jane Castor’s local concert (COT/TPD/SOF).
81. The decision to adopt a different set of management plans, policies and operating procedures is a discretionary function, but its implementation of an incomplete or illegal set of them isn’t. In Maryls Bear Medicine v. United States (9th Cir. 2000) 241 F.3d 1208. When a state or federal agency has acted contrary to mandates or directives, imposing liability doesn’t require a court to second-guess legislative and administrative decisions grounded in social, economic or political policy. “When a suit charges an agency with failing to act in accord with a specific mandatory directive, the discretionary function exception doesn’t apply.” (Berkovitz, 486 U.S. at 544, 108 S.Ct. at 1963.) and (Faber v. United States (9th Cir. 1995) 56 F.3d 1122). A “failure to effectuate policy choices already made, will not be protected under the discretionary function exception.” (Id., 241 F.3d at 1215, emphasis added.)
82. Defendant COT failed to adhere to its STANDARD management plans, policies and operating procedures, opting to initiate an illegal type of DHS Blue Campaign, to intentionally injure the Plaintiff and his wife. Defendant COT was absolutely instructed by its superiors, DHS and Jane Castor, to adhere to a made up set of illegal Blue Campaign operational requirements, to intentionally injure the Plaintiff and his wife. Clearly the reason for the Plaintiff’s injuries (hindsight’s 20/20). During 2022, COT had specific mandatory operating requirements in place, but knowingly and intentionally adhered to a DIFFERENT set of illegal operating requirements, instructing its agent cops to use inapplicable Florida Chapter 825 and a set of illegal DHS’s Blue Campaign instructions on at least the Plaintiff and his wife. This is evident when COT/TPD agent cops, intentionally injured the Plaintiff and his wife, in violation of STANDARD MANDATES, imposed on COT/TPD by Jane Castor and Mark Braswell as their own set of made up operating requirements! Basically DHS’s Blue Campaign mandates are illegally changed whenever desired by DHS agents to implement a witch hunt for prosecuting any FRB marked consumer for actions taken that can be misconstrued as obtaining labor for free. What Agent Braswell from DHS in Orlando, Florida did, was illegally involve his agency in injuring the Plaintiff and his wife as an FRB retaliatory act through COT/TPD/SOF.
83. The Department of Homeland Security (see Appendix A) FUNDS COT/TPD and most local law enforcement agencies to keep them inline with what it wants and when it wants it by, or they’ll be investigated and charged like Judge Hannah Dugan, a Milwaukee County Circuit judge was. The Homeland Security provides to local state agencies, a suite of risk-based grants to assist state, local, tribal and territorial efforts in preventing, protecting against, mitigating, responding to and recovering from acts of terrorism and other threats. So they say. The point is COT/TPD; and Jane Castor have their hands in DHS’s pockets. Consequently if COT/TPD; and Jane Castor fail to take orders from DHS, they’re funding could quickly stop along with DHS perks!
84. A municipality or employee is a proper defendant under Title 42, Chapter 21, Section 1983, where the conduct complained of relates to an official municipal policy, custom, or practice causing the U.S. constitutional tort. Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs. of New York, 436 U.S. 658, 691, 98 S. Ct. 2018 (1972). If COT/TPD, or bastard Mayor Jane Castor, can produce any physical evidence of 1) Mrs. Kimball having been disabled under Florida Chapter 825; 2) the Plaintiff having been Mrs. Kimball’s caregiver; or 3) the Plaintiff having abused/stolen from Mrs. Kimball in violation of any Florida statue, he’ll drop this lawsuit! The corpus delicti rule requires that the prosecution present independent evidence to establish that a crime has occurred. This evidence should include physical evidence, which directly establishes the fact of a crime. In contrast, witness testimony alone in an affidavit ISN’T sufficient to establish corpus delicti. People v. McMahan. See Appendix B.
85. The funding of TPD comes from COT, which is FRB funded, directly and indirectly, by both the quasi-government FRB (DeSantis) and FRB commercial subsidiary banking investment corporations, like Chase Manhattan; Rothschild & Co. and their subsidiaries investments like Rockefeller Brothers Fund; Citigroup; Blackrock; Vanguard; and State Street shell corporations. And COT/TPD’s is funded through federal government agencies too like DHS, and by intra-governmental transfers.
86. COT (a municipality) is being sued in state court for their employees (about 4 dozen, including Jane Castor) having committed intentional and culpable torts while acting within the scope of agent employment, which 1) breached a state government policy. But is also being sued by the Plaintiff in federal court for having 2) implemented a state government policy in violation of their duty to the public under the U.S. Constitution. There were federal violations of, but not limited to, the following federal statutes by Jane Castor acting through COT; and TPD agent cops, along with concert member SOF: 1. Title 18, Chapter 13, U.S. Code § 241; 2. Title 42, Chapter 21, Section 1983; and Title 18, Chapter 13, U.S. Code § 241.
87. The federal statute of limitations in a circuit is tolled permanently on acts to defraud and deprive a plaintiff of his or her human/civil/constitutional rights done in conjunction with committing a Fraud on the Court, (F.S. 1540 or federal 60(b)(3)), or being at least an accessory after the fact (AATF) in a murder under Title 18, U.S. Code § 3, as is the case in this matter!
88. Racketeering under the RICO Act is automatically an intentional breach of government policy, at least according to state and federal constitutions; statutes; rules; duty to render aid; and common laws still in place!
89. The Federal Constitution, Florida Constitution, Florida state laws, rules and regulations, don’t allow immunity, if a state agent acted willfully, maliciously, fraudulently, in bad faith, beyond his or her authority, or under a mistaken interpretation of the law.
90. When determining whether qualified immunity applies, the central questions are: (1) whether the facts alleged, taken in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, demonstrate that the defendant’s conduct violated a statutory or constitutional right, and (2) whether the right at issue was clearly established. Committee To Protect Our Agricultural Water, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Occidental Oil and Gas Corporation, et al, Defendants. No. 1: 15–cv–01323–DAD–JLT. Signed 01/20/2017. Jane Castor and her co-conspiring agent cops through Defendant COT, absolutely knew what they had been committing on consumers periodically for years, violated the Plaintiff and his wife’s state and federal constitutional rights under the 4th amendment.
91. Government officials enjoy qualified immunity from civil damages, unless their conduct violates “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable prudent person would have known.” Jeffers v. Gomez, 267 F. 3d 895, 910 (9th Cir. 2001) (quoting Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818, 102 S. Ct. 2727, 73 L. Ed. 2d 396 (1982)); see also Bruce v. Ylst, 351 F. 3d 1283, 1290 (9th Cir. 2003).
92. According to the American Bar Association, Volume 18, Number 3 January/February 2009, by Razzano and Kristin H. Jones, since the enactment of 18 U.S.C. § 1346, federal courts have tried to step into this gap. They have divided the universe of honest services fraud into two spheres: public and private honest services fraud. Public honest services fraud is the instrument used by federal prosecutors to impose the federal government’s view of good government on state and local officials. Since the national government under our federal system cannot pass bribery or conflict of interest laws covering local and state officials, the honest services fraud statute has become its vehicle for enforcing its view of good government on state and local jurisdictions. The theory is that when a local or state official 1) takes a bribe, or 2) is embroiled in a conflict of interest, he or she defrauds the people of the state or locality of their right to that public official’s honest services. The courts have widely recognized two theories of honest services fraud in public-sector honest services fraud prosecutions: (1) bribery, where a public official was paid, with some type of valued benefit (not necessarily with money), for a particular decision or action, or (2) a failure to disclose a conflict of interest resulting in personal gain (something of value, but not necessarily monetary).
93. The 11th Circuit’s position is that “[p]ublic officials inherently owe a fiduciary duty to the public to make governmental decisions in the public’s best interest. ‘If the official instead secretly makes his decision based on his own personal interests. . . the official has defrauded the public of his honest services.’” United States v. DeVegter, 198 F. 3d 1324, 1328 (11th Cir. 1999) (quoting United States v. Lopez-Lukis, 102 F. 3d 1164, 1169 (11th Cir. 1997) (emphasis added) (internal citation omitted). The First, Fourth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuit Courts have all held that the federal statute does not limit the meaning of “honest services” to violations of state law.
94. Plaintiffs have been allowed to bring RICO actions for acts of public corruption that resulted in pecuniary (monetary) injury to them. Envtl. Tectonics V. W. S. Kirkpatrick, Inc., 847 F. 2d 1052, 1067 (3d Cir. 1988); (business competitor had standing to challenge defendant’s alleged use of bribery of foreign government officials to obtain contracts), judgment aff’d, 493 U.S. 400 (1990); Town of Kearny v. Hudson Meadows Urban Renewal Corp., 829 F. 2d 1263, 1268 (3d Cir. 1987) (land developer allowed to bring RICO action for injuries sustained from defendants’ bribery of town officials) and Bieter Co. v. Blomquist, 987 F. 2d 1319, 1327 (8th Cir. 1993) (permitting builder to pursue RICO claim where alleged bribery of public officials raised issue of fact concerning proximate cause of builder’s injury from failure to obtain rezoning). Also, all extortion statutes require that a threat must be made to the person or property of the victim. And a threat to harm a person in his or her career, job or reputation, is also an act of extortion.
95. Nowhere in America, does any statute acknowledge eye witness testimony as being the equivalent to physical/material evidence, and thus only witness testimony being substantial enough to accept as corpus delicti evidence needed to prosecute, or litigate an economic offence. If this were the case, sum sufficient evidence (more likely than not) of wrongs being committed, could be obtained merely by FRB contracted/paid agents, seeking to injure consumers physically/monetarily/emotionally for increased illegal spoils going, or staying in, FRB owned and operated corporate circulation. Consequently, the State of Florida failed to prove a prima facie case based on physical (material) evidence of a crime committed, so the Plaintiff’s conviction in case 22-CF-2324-A is VOID, due to both former state attorney Andrew Warren; Susan Lopez; Lynn Goudie; and Mellissa Grajales (court case 22-CF-2324-A) accepting and using only false agent cop testimony on official government forms with official letterheads and seals attached, when there was a bona fide conflict of interest present, for the purpose of injuring the Plaintiff and his wife, for FRB monetary and retaliatory purposes. Testimony evidence might be admissible if from unbiased witnesses, but it’s NOT material evidence of an offence committed! Many corrupt judges use witness testimony wrongly as if material evidence, but it’s not! If there’s no corpus delicti, thus no physical evidence amounting to a violation of statute, then there’s been no crime committed! TALK IS CHEAP LADIES! Witness testimony has wrongly been used by judges and prosecutors for decades to convict innocent parties for the FRB, which employs biased/bribed/extorted witnesses for illegal FRB profits/gains/retaliations! Consumer injuries occurring in both criminal/civil court cases, due to lying public/private, FRB contracted/paid/bribed agent witnesses, results in HUGE increases in consumers’ monetary losses going to the FRB owners, by way of either government agencies/agents; but mostly by vendor agent thieves; or private agent thieves making FRB purchases with consumers’ stolen moneys on FRB goods at 500% to 1000% markups. COPS and JUDGES aren’t neutral unbiased witnesses to crimes to be used in place of physical/material evidence when needing to substantiate statute violations! COPS and JUDGES work for, and are contracted/paid/bribed agents of the FRB, a privately owned and operated funding/investing/organization/cartel/enterprise.
96. Witness testimony often fills gaps when physical evidence is unavailable. It provides firsthand accounts that can corroborate or contradict other non-material evidence. However, its reliability is carefully examined, as human testimony can be falsely made on purpose, due to witnesses being paid by the same entities as the ones who benefit from the testimony. Witnesses are excluded from testifying, if there is a conflict of interest to tell the truth because of who they work for, as is the case with expert witness cops (officers of the court). A conflict of interests will disqualify an expert witness from testifying on behalf of a party (State of Florida). If there’s a concern that an expert witness has, or will illegally provide false testimony to financially benefit their employer, the witness will be disqualified. Any expert can have a conflict of interest. Such a conflict may exist, if the expert has been formerly employed by, or previously hired as, an expert for the opposing side. This is the case with judges, cops and attorneys (officers of the court) working for the State of Florida! They’re all employed by FRB owners/controllers through their FRB contracted/paid/bribed/coerced/extorted/agencies/corporations! Consequently, FRB contracted/paid/bribed/extorted cops, attorneys and judges, working together with FRB owners/controllers as a multilevel retaliatory group against blacklisted consumers, implementing RICO predicate acts on them, is called RACKETEERING, which always results in liability through the 4 Doctrines of law cited! Agent caused physical injuries ALWAYS results in consumer monetary losses, ultimately going to the FRB owners who fund/bribe/extort/invest in just about every mixed market business under the sun. And this knowingly makes them MAJOR END RECIPIENTS of hot cash flows during illegal commerce based transactions!
97. COT, a municipality, operates under its own local government charter.
98. Sovereign immunity doesn’t apply in this matter to any of the Defendants:
(A). Where there are state and federal operational decisions made as to how policies will be implemented, there’s no governmental sovereign immunity from policy violations! What Jane Castor did through COT/TPD, was adhere to a made up illegal management plan; policy; and operating procedure, while racketeering, which were breaches of state and federal standard mandated ones!
99. Relevant Statements of Fact about the State of Florida (SOF):
100. State of Florida agents A) Andrew Warren; and B) Susan Lopez, wrongly prosecuted the Plaintiff from 3/2022 to 12/2023 in case 22-CF-2324-A, when no crime was committed by anyone except government agents. SOF committed 3 other injuries on the Plaintiff in 2025, but before 8- 21-25. These 3 injuries committed in 2025, before 8-21-25, tolls the statute to file on SOF for all the violations committed, by at least another 3 years. And C) Ronald Desantis from case 25-CA-564 in 5/2025, refused to investigate as his mandatory constitutional duty – – under Florida’s Constitution, Section 6, Article 4:
1) what was on the full Take 5, FHP obtained, murder video of the Plaintiff’s wife; 2) the Plaintiff being exonerated from the false conviction in case 22-CF-2324-A; 3) the Plaintiff having his mother and wife’s murders officially looked into; and 4) the Plaintiff obtaining Mrs. Kimball’s medical records from TGH (again case 25-CA-564). AHCA denied the Plaintiff’s TGH complaint on 7/2025, which requested AHCA to officially order TGH to provide him his wife’s medical records. See Appendix A. To date, the Plaintiff has not obtained these records. Consequently, the Plaintiff is STILL being defrauded by SOF through Desantis (case 25-CA-564 appealed); AHCA records request denied by ACHA in Appendix A; and FHP not allowing the Plaintiff his wife’s full murder video from case 24-CA-7358, all still denied at the time he files this complaint.
101. This is a lawsuit where the Continuous Tort Doctrine is definitely applicable. The first set of SOF injuries happened in 3/2022 when it through Andrew Warren, wrongly filed the paperwork to prosecute the Plaintiff with nonexistent physical evidence of: 1) neglect and 2) theft violations, filed with his office by DHS through Jane Castor’s local concert (SOF/COT/TPD). Damages from this case lasted until 12/2023 when the Plaintiff was released from jail. The next set of injuries occurred in 5/2025, when SOF through Governor Desantis, who illegally came into case 25-CA-564 after a default judgment was file on him by the Clerk of the Court of Leon County, requested that Judge Sjostrom illegally dismiss the case to stop the Plaintiff from acquiring more evidence to sue TGH/DHS/COT/SOF; and Jane Castor for any injuries its agents caused him and his wife. Now the Plaintiff can sue TGH for spoliation of evidence in his wife’s aggravated manslaughter (murder).
102. TGH is believed to have intentionally finishing Mrs. Kimball off by committing a breach of its hospital regulatory procedures – – TGH should’ve quickly remove a bone fragment lodged in Mrs. Kimball’s brain. After which ACHA in 7/2025 denied the Plaintiff’s request to order TGH to provide him with his wife’s medical records (Appendix A), wrongly claiming he had supposedly asked ACHA, not TGH, for his wife’s medical records. A total bull chip lie! AHCA doesn’t store medical records from hospitals! The Plaintiff begged ACHA starting in the beginning of 2024 for his wife’s medical records, while Kim Smoak laughed in his ear and then hung up the phone. See Appendix A.
103. SOF was a concert member participant involved with DHS/COT/TPD in this matter, when Jane Castor had authorized the illegal detaining of Mrs. Kimball on 2-23-22, using TPD agent cops. After 3 weeks, Mrs. Kimball was shown the streets by TPD agent cops with nowhere to go and where Attorney Matthew Kimball McDowell found her 3 month later in Pinellas County Florida, living and sleeping on CONCRETE without her medications! If Mrs. Kimball was really SOF’s witness, where was the physical evidence given to them by COT/TPD before or after the Plaintiff’s arrest to prove a crime was committed by him? It certainly wasn’t placed into case file 22-CF-2324-A. If after COT/TPD having given SOF, NO testimony it could use to prosecute the Plaintiff with (no affidavit signed, or audio/video filed in case 22-CF-2324- A, incriminating the Plaintiff in any Florida statute violation), and SOF/COT/TPD/DHS; and Jane Castor knew Mrs. Kimball was disabled and in need of her medications, which her attorney Matthew McDowell provided to her on the streets only once, multiple state and city agents, like Jane Castor; Andrew Warren; Susan Lopez; Lynn Goudie; and Mellissa Grajales, are at least culpably negligent in her aggravated manslaughter (MURDER), by having intentionally violated the survival action statute (F.S. 46.021) by keeping her on the streets, with the false no contact order on her husband, currently still in place!
104. The statute for malicious prosecution is 4 years from the time case 22-CF-2324-A ended under F.S. 95.11. And a complaint for wrongful death, has to be filed 2 years from the date of death. SOF’s second tort committed on the Plaintiff was 5 months before the wrongful death of Mrs. Kimball tolled, which is at the time of the last filed amended complaint. Consequently the defrauding of the Plaintiff by Desantis in 5/2025; FHP in early 2025; and AHCA in 7/2025, tolls the wrongful death and survival action statutes for suing SOF for another three (3.5) years, with no statute of limitations for crimes committed involving murder under the RICO Act. This gives SOF its 6 months to investigate all the injuries it’s liable for through its agents.
105. Continuous torts – – federal courts have found the statute of limitations must accrue from the date of the last wrongful act where there is another separate wrong committed by the same entity. Leonhard v United States, 633 F. 2d 599, 613 (2d Cir. 1980). Thus, under the continuous violation doctrine, “the limitation period for a continuing offence does not began until the offence, or offences, are completed.” United States v Rivera-Ventura, 72 F. 3d 277, 281 (2d Cir. 1995). The nature of Plaintiff’s claim is such that the 1) continued Fraud on the Court committed by DeSantis; the 2) defrauding of the Plaintiff out of his wife’s medical records by AHCA; and FHP committing a Fraud on the Court to do the Plaintiff out of his wife’s full murder video, all happened in 2025, as well as other facts and information relating thereto, constitutes a continuing tort violation by SOF for at least an addition 3.5 years in both state and federal court. Whether Mrs. Kimball could’ve been saved, had a medical procedure been correctly performed (malpractice), or had the procedure been performed in a timely fashion in accordance with state and federal hospital medical regulations (wrongful death), the wrongful spoliation of records allowed to stand by SOF through AHCA, haven’t been corrected! So the plaintiff is still being injured by SOF. Consequently, SOF is still liable to the Plaintiff for damages resulting from court cases 22-CF-2324-A; 21-CF-006147-A; 24-CA-7358; 25-CA-564; and AHCA – – the Plaintiff was not able to obtain his wife’s medical records to have sued TGH for any particular type of injury within the 2 year statute of limitations. Every time an SOF employee intentionally defrauds the Plaintiff by committing a NEW OFFENCE on him, they monetary injure him, SAVING the FRB moneys due to racketeering. Yes the FRB, because there’s no other reason for FRB contracted/paid/bribed public and private agents intentionally committing racketeering type frauds on perfect strangers like the Plaintiff and his wife, but to profit their benefactors the FRB!
106. State Attorney Andrew Warren and Susan Lopez illegally prosecuted the Plaintiff with no corpus delicti and no prima facie case made. They had sneaky; obvious; and mean prosecutor Mellissa Grajales; and twisted Judge Goudie, knowingly and intentionally lie for the State of Florida, on record in case 22-CF-2324-A (watch the films in Appendix E), that the Plaintiff had supposedly:
(1). Stolen over $50,000 of his wife’s money;
(2). Abused his wife by making her relieve herself in a bucket;
(3). Didn’t properly care for his wife when she was supposedly disabled under Florida Chapter 825; and
(4). The Plaintiff was supposedly his wife’s caregiver, due to a 2012 cancelled guardian advocacy contract, all without producing one bit of physical evidence substantiating these blatant lies!
107. SOF is being sued in state court for dozens of its agents having committed a negligent or intentional tort while acting within the scope of his or her employment, which 1) breached a state government policy (Andrew Warren; Susan Lopez; Lynn Goudie; Mellissa Grajales). And it’s also being sued in federal court, for having 2) implemented a government policy in violation of their duty to the public under the U.S. Constitution. The plaintiff is suing SOF in federal court under, but not limited to the following: 1) Title 28, Chapter 190, Section 5001; 2) (Title 18, Chapter 13, U.S. Codes § 241); 3) Title 42, Chapter 21, Section 1983; and 4) Title 18, Chapter 13, U.S. Code § 241. Punitive damages and attorney’s fees are owed for common law frauds and breaches of fiduciary duties to the public by municipalities. “A public official, acts as trustee for the citizens and the State … and thus owes the normal fiduciary duties of a trustee, e.g., honesty and loyalty to them.” United States v. Kincaid-Chauncey, 556 F. 3d 923, 939 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting United States v. Silvano, 812 F. 2d 754, 759 (1st Cir. 1987) and United States v. Mandel, 591 F. 2d 1347, 1363 (4th Cir. 1979) (internal quotation marks omitted)).
108. Defendant SOF was working with DHS/COT/TPD; and Jane Castor, through SOF agents Andrew Warren and Susan Lopez, but both of them were adhering to a different set of management plans, polices and operating procedures, a type of racketeering plan for the purpose of injuring the Plaintiff and his wife. So consequently SOF was operating under a different, NON-STANDARD set of operating requirements, due to Jane Castor being technically the director of the local FRB contracted/paid/bribed CONCERT which included Andrew Warren and Susan Lopez.
109. SOF (a municipality) is being sued in state court for its agents/employees (DeSantis; Warren; Lopez; Smoak) having committed culpable and/or intentionally torts while acting within the scope of his or her employment which 1) breached a state government policy. It’s also being sued in federal court for having 2) implemented a state government policy in violation of their duty to the public under the U.S. Constitution – – 1. Title 18, Chapter 13, U.S. Codes § 241; 2. Title 42, Chapter 21, Section 1983; and Title 18, Chapter 13, U.S. Code § 241.
110. Relevant Statements of fact against Defendant Rothschild:
111. Defendant Rothschild is an FRB owner and controller within the Rothschild & Co. banking syndicate, and has been a racketeering participant owner and controller under Title 18, Chapter 96, Sections 1962 (b & d) in this matter, through at least his joint investment ventures with the cartel owners of: Chase Manhattan Investment Holdings, LP.; Chase Manhattan BSP Holdings Corp.; Rockefeller Brothers Fund; Rothschild & Co. Continuation Holdings; Rothschild & Co.; State of Florida; and at least shell corporations BlackRock; Vanguard; and State Street. This is because 1) Defendant Rothschild as the CEO of Rothschild & Co. US Inc., personally profits as an owner; controller; and profiteer of the corporations cited above, who has access to some of his family’s assets/resources/holdings/proceeds used for investing in the FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment corporations (owned and invested in shell mergers and acquisitions), and is not a mere shareholder awarded only dividends from any FRB commercial subsidiary investment corporation. Defendant Rothschild funds the FRB through his FRB commercial subsidiary banking investment corporations – – Rothschild & Co., which is funded through its commercial subsidiary investment corporations; and shell corporations, as well as his quasi-government FRB. Defendant Rothschild is also an owner of some of the Rothschild assets/resources/holdings of the FRB, making up over 40% of the FRB, a private cartel of FRB banking syndicates. Consequently Imputed/Benefactor/AATF Defendant Rothschild, is AS liable to the Plaintiff as the FRB and its contracted/paid agents.
112. Defendant Rothschild through his quasi-government FRB and his FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, funds and invests in the DHS; SOF; COT; and TPD agencies – – most of the Defendants named in this complaint along with being the benefactor of the presiding judge on this case. Under Section 1962(b) a defendant only has to acquire an interest in, for the control of, an agency or corporation (a public/private business), due to racketeering activities. Davis-Lynch, Inc. v. Moreno, 667 F.3d 539, 550-51 (5th Cir. 2012). And Defendant Rothschild and his family either own or are invested in just about every agency, corporation and agent ON THE PLANET!
113. Relevant Statements of Fact against specifically JPMorgan Chase & Co.; but also Alex Rothschild, and the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) due to prior mergers and acquisitions:
114. JPMorgan Chase & Co. agreed to a $92 million settlement with 24 states, including Florida, and the District of Columbia for its alleged role in a nationwide scheme to rig bids and engage in anti-competitive, fraudulent conduct relating to municipal bond derivatives. Florida entities involved in the settlement were: Florida Intergovernmental Finance Commission, Florida Municipal Power Agency, Florida Water Services Corp. Tampa Bay Water Authority, Hillsborough County, Hillsborough County Port District, Florida State Department of Transportation. If there’s moneys being paid out on bond derivatives by a municipal under a FRB commercial subsidiary banking contract, there’s a thousand other municipals under contract for multiple types of FRB commercial bank funds and FRB commercial services within the same state, and all of these municipals share hot FRB funds and hot FRB proceeds with others, thus the term inter-governmental transfers (federal to state; state to local); and intra-governmental – – local to local/state agencies are applicable.
115. Defendants Chase; and Rothschild are liable for all the law violations committed in this matter, using the 4 doctrines of law cited: Vicarious Liability; Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Continuous Tort; and Section 1349; along with civil and criminal RICO Act violations (predicate acts), when they knowingly and intentionally allowed their contracted/paid/bribed agents to get away with committing them, after being imputed with the knowledge of their agents’ crimes as funding and investing benefactors under Section 1962 (b & d) – – John Rockefeller; and Alex Rothschild were Imputed with their agents’ crimes in 2020 and/or 2025 Appendix A, yet they only turned a blind eye to them, when they were in a position to take corrective measures! A fraud permitted to stand by an employer, after he or she has knowingly benefited by the fraud, is just as much wrong as an employer knowingly permitting a fraud to be committed by an employee before being benefited. Quick v. Peoples Bank of Cullman Cnty. , 993 F. 2d 793, 797 (11th Cir. 1993).
116. This is a RICO case merely because all the Defendants committed racketeering activities which benefited the FRB financially, even the one committed by Defendant Dawson. This matter involves FRB contracted/paid agents, due to all the Defendants, including Defendant Dawson’s State Farm Insurance Company, being affiliates of either Chase or Rothschild, who acquired interest in, for control of, the same racketeering public/private agencies and corporations involved in this matter. Chase/Rothschild are also being sued for the Plaintiff’s personal injuries sustained, as a result of Chase/Rothschild/FRB agent conversion frauds and tortious interference scams, as both accessories after the fact (AATF) and before the fact (ABTF) due to the Law of Agency. Defendant Dawson’s State Farm insurance company is an affiliate of Blackrock owned by Rothschilds (see Appendix A). There has to be conspiracies to commit RICO predicate acts, with these types of acts having been committed, or there’s no racketeering violation. So the list of racketeering activities committed by Chase/Rothschild were, and still are, through the same Defendants in this complaint; under the same corresponding Counts; and for committing the same corresponding law violations (allegations). Consequently, Chase/Rothschild are both liable for every injury committed by its contracted/paid agents cited in this complaint.
117. Unfortunately, this Court is also an FRB contracted/paid/bribed with his or her salary and perks, agent, who will probably illegally dismiss this complaint with prejudice and be in violation of Fla. Stat. §838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6); Sections 1346; 1341; 1343; and Chapter 817.155, but mainly the RICO Act. The 4 doctrines of law, which give the Plaintiff the same standing to sue the Defendants in this complaint, allows him to also sue either Chase/Rothschild/FRB as their BENEFACTORS, due to the Plaintiff having imputed to both John and Alex, the facts of this matter, prior to, and during this state court case (2025). Chase/Rothschild/FRB were directly notified through both John Rockefeller and Alex Rothschild of Chase/Rothschild/FRB agent racketeering activities committed on the Plaintiff and his wife over the past 13 years (see Appendix A). Having done this with the fact the Plaintiff is now having to sue Chase and Alex, means John and Alex failed, as at least Chase/Rothschild/FRB controllers under Section 1962(b & d), to take corrective measures in stopping the local racketeering still being continuously committed on the Plaintiff and his murdered wife, and paying them restitution. Although any money awarded by a court in this matter will be paid by the Defendants, it’s all being held and used by the FRB owners, but there’s no cap on the amount obtainable from Chase/Rothschild as an awarded amount.
118. By looking at the facts the Plaintiff imputed directly to John Rockefeller in both 2020 and 2025 (Appendix A), there’s no doubt John was motivated into implementing the Plaintiff’s illegal arrest and his wife’s injuries through the same agents Defendants Chase/Rothschild contract/paid/bribe, making them the proximate cause of liability for injuries sustained by the Plaintiff and his wife. Alex Rothschild as the current CEO of Rothschild & Co. US Inc., can be readily tied to local agent liability as a PAST and CURRENT benefactor of liable agent participants in this matter through Chase/Rothschild, by A) using the 4 doctrines of law cited, along with also B) having been imputed with the facts in this matter (knowledge & intent), thus proving the participating agencies and corporations involved, were contract/paid/bribed through not only Chase/Rothschild through their quasi-government FRB funding source, but by Chase/Rothschild commercial subsidiary banking investment corporations. Chase/Rothschild are a private investment source, with an acquired interest in, for the control of, under Section 1962(b & d), using and acquired racketeering moneys to support their ongoing investment operations. So the Plaintiff has tied Chase/Rothschild/FRB contracted/paid agents in this matter to Chase and Alex Rothschild.
119. Defendants Chase/Rothschild quasi-government FRB and their FRB commercial subsidiary banking CONTRACTS with agencies and corporations, are performance driven service contracts for receiving both Chase/Rothschild quasi-government funding and Chase/Rothschild commercial subsidiary investment loans with required agency proceeds submitted to the Chase/Rothschild commercial subsidiary banks quarterly (Fedwire & Chase/Rothschild commercial subsidiary banks). FRB quasi-government funding (intra & intergovernmental transfers, see Appendix D) flow through the Treasury to agencies to perform daily services, which also routes their municipal proceeds back to pay the Chase/Rothschild commercial subsidiary banking investment corporations, its interest on bonds and loans, with defrauded consumers always used as the collateral on both the funding and investing CONTRACTS. These CONTRACTS are for FRB moneys used to pay for, but not limited to, state infrastructure costs; state law enforcement salaries; state judicial salaries; and perk money payments, in return for agent performance, and this is what binds and solidifies FRB contracted/paid state agents to Defendants Chase/Rothschild in a corrupt racketeering banking relationship (Appendix D), even though we don’t know who all the FRB owners are, but under the RICO Act, the private owners of the quasi-government FRB and the FRB commercial subsidiary corporations, do business with the agencies; and corporations involved in this matter as the same entity – – Chase and Alex Rothschild.
120. The FRB may be sued in any appropriate district court pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C. Code 1338, which means the FRB is a person not a government entity, which grants only federal courts jurisdiction to hear lawsuits against it. So the Plaintiff has standing to sue the 1) FRB owners directly or through their 2) commercial subsidiary banking corporations – – Chase/Rothschild & Co. in state court, when its owners knowingly and intentionally fund/invest hot stolen consumer proceeds coming out of all agencies and most major corporations in America, through their quasi-government and commercial subsidiary banking corporations, owners who’ve acquired an interest in, for the control of, as many public/private businesses as it can within the state of Florida, due to racketeering activities (Title 18, Chapter 96, Sections 1962(b & d). Under the RICO Act, the businesses; the enterprise; and its owners, are one in the same entity. This also means the FRB’s contracted/paid agents’ illegal actions committed while under CONTRACT to perform for the FRB and FRB Chase/Rothschild commercial subsidiary banking investment corporations, by generating hot stolen income for them through conversion frauds and tortious interference scams committed on the Plaintiff, and a million other consumers, allows just Chase/Rothschild to be sued by the Plaintiff under the: 1) Respondeat Superior Doctrine; 2) Imputation Doctrine; 3) Vicarious Liability Doctrine; 4) Continuous Tort Doctrine; and 5) Section 1349. The FRB owners/controllers require and achieve production of hot stolen income mainly through their JUDICIAL and POLICING agents operating in courthouses, after official consumer complaints are filed, using bribes (Section 201) and extortion tactics (Section 1951) implemented by governors and state agents, as seen in local cases 22-CF-2324-A; 21-CF-006147-A; 25-CA-564; 24-CA- 7358; and 25-CA-8096.
121. Defendants Chase/Rothschild used bribes and extortion methods (the motivational factor behind the predicate acts committed, not an allegation related to any Count yet) on elected officials it helped put in office, for the purpose of maintaining conversion frauds (F.S. 812.014) and tortious interference scams (F.S.
768.72/§§95.11(3)(o & p), implemented on consumers to illegally increase FRB owner profits and gains, with FRB owner/controller knowledge and approval through state governors (case 25-CA-564), IN BOTH CRIMINAL AND CIVIL COURTROOMS. See Appendix A. Many owners/controllers of the FRB were directly noticed by the Plaintiff in early 2025 of their agents’ scams, but they only turned blind eyes (acquiesced) to taking the proper corrective measures in remedying the wrongs committed by their agents. So now Chase/Rothschild are being sued for their agents’ wrongs committed (Counts). The wrongful conduct by the Chase/Rothschild, acting through their contracted/paid agents, after the fact (AATF) as IMPUTED entities, makes both guilty under the Respondeat Superior; Imputation; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines for the Plaintiff and his wife sustained injuries, as if it they had permitted the frauds beforehand!
122. Defendants Chase/Rothschild commercial subsidiary banking CONTRACTS to perform services for receiving Chase/Rothschild investment moneys with required agency/corporate proceeds summited to them quarterly (Fedwire & Chase/Rothschild commercial subsidiary banks); and 2) the flow of FRB quasigovernment funding (intra and intergovernmental transfers, see Appendix D) to agencies to perform daily services, also routes their municipal proceeds back to Chase/Rothschild to pay the interest on their Chase/Rothschild subsidiary loans, with defrauded consumers always used as the collateral on both the investing and funding CONTRACTS. These CONTRACTS are for FRB moneys used to pay for, but not limited to, infrastructure costs; law enforcement salaries; judicial salaries; and perk money payments, in return for agent performance in racketeering activities involving honest services frauds; wire; and mail misrepresentation, committed during cases 22-CF- 2324-A; 21-CF-006147-A; 25-CA-564; 24-CA-7358; and 25-CA-8096. These self-renewing agency performance contracts for moneys, are what binds and solidifies the FRB owners; their FRB quasi-government cartel; and their commercial subsidiary banking investment corporations in a corrupt racketeering banking relationship. These contracts are performance based ones with penalties (extortions) for nonproduction, using consumers as both the collateral on Chase/Rothschild notes and the premiums acquired by fleecing them. Thus Chase/Rothschild/FRB controls the largest resource on the planet, injured for obtaining maximum amounts of profits, and used as the source of surety/collateral by elected agency managers in securing banking contract with Chase/Rothschild commercial subsidiary banks. There isn’t one agency in America that isn’t under contract with one FRB commercial subsidiary banking corporation, and 95% of the time, it’s invested in by either Chase or Rothschild. See Appendix D.
123. Thus the Plaintiff has standing to sue any Chase/Rothschild/FRB owner/controller, at least under Title 18, Chapter 96, Sections 1962(b as controllers & d as conspirators) as an organization/cartel/enterprise/association-in-fact enterprise, or just for personal injuries.
124. Since the private Chase/Rothschild owned companies 1) invests in 95% of all the banks and major conglomerates in America, due to mergers and acquisitions with other cartel members, it basically owns the American economy (see Appendix D), so it’s able to not only obtain a defrauded consumer’ s moneys once through thieving vendor agents involved in conversion frauds, but multiple times on the same goods and services needed to be consumer purchased again and again, illegally using its administrative/judicial agents, like banking chairmen and judges, to officially launder the loot permanently home to the FRB owners and their commercial investment corporations. By the FRB owners/controllers sanctioning their contracted/paid agents’ crimes, by turning blind eyes to defrauded consumers’ complaints, consumers have to spend MORE moneys on vendor agent thieves’ goods and services. Consequently, the Rockefellers and Rothschilds, who own the majority of the assets/resources/holdings within the FRB (85%), knowingly and intentionally acquire consumers’ hot stolen moneys through their mixed market, investment corporations, invested in by other cartel members 95% of the time, for increased repetitive use of consumers’ stolen and owed moneys, which vendor and private agent thieve deposited their moneys immediately into as seen on ledger sheet transfers – – transfers into FRB commercial subsidiary banks within merchant accounts. VERY SLICK!
125. Relevant Statements of Fact against Defendant Crist:
126. Defendant Crist is the Clerk of the Court and Comptroller for the 13th Judicial Circuit and is paid with Hillsborough County moneys authorized by its BOCC, a public agency contracted and paid for by the FRB Cartel and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations.
127. Case 25-CA-8096 was filed on the FRB’s parent corporation, through its branch agent in San Francisco, CA., not on this branch, and Defendant Crist and his agents knew this, yet the style of the case in Fisher & Phillip LLP was wrong. Kathleen Rocamora at 813-460-6710, was involved in this murder cover-up of Mrs. Kimball, and the cover-up of the intentional torts committed by the Defendants, which were sanctioned by Defendant Crist, when she told the Plaintiff that Judge Barber and Victor Crist had case 25-CA-8096 removed from state court and that federal case 25-CV-3077 was already open! This can’t legally happen in a day or two without procedural due process of the law!
128. The FRB had its local paid attorneys at Fisher & Phillips, LLP, illegally demand the Clerk of the Court, Defendant Crist, and his BOCC/FRB contracted/paid agents there, illegally transfer case 25-CA- 8096 to the Middle District of Florida immediately and without Defendant approval or a hearing! Had a hearing been scheduled, but after all parties were served and responded to their summonses, the Plaintiff would’ve told Judge Nash that he was already suing four (4) parties from case 15-CA-8096, in the middle district, case 25-CV-2181, and would’ve gladly dropped the FRB from the state case due to Title 12, USC, Statute 632.
129. On 11-12-25 and the next day, Defendant Crist’s office was contacted at 813-307-7027 (Amy) a dozen times by the Plaintiff with messages left a week before his state case was illegally dismissed by Victor Crist and transferred to case 25-CV-3077, but prior to this, Crist intentionally never had the Plaintiff’s case file transferred back to state court, ignoring his phone calls.
130. Defendant Crist committed intentional torts on the Plaintiff through his agents working at the 13 Judicial Circuit on 11-10-25 or before. This complaint is against Defendant Crist, not the local state courthouse or its employees.
***131. State courts must entertain federal claims, but not for the purpose of enforcing them, as if the state court were a Federal court. Consequently all statute violations committed are cited, but the Defendants only have to answer to their state violations.
132. Counts; with elements of; and statute violations for Defendant Rothschild:
133. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations and legal precedence set forth in paragraphs 1 through 112; and 125 through 130 as if fully set forth herein, and Defendant Rothschild being the proximate cause thereof.
The Plaintiff is seeking compensation (relief) from the Defendant Rothschild, due to being Mrs. Kimball’s spouse and under Law of Agency; Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines; and for being the defendant in bogus case 22-CF-2324-A:
The criminal/civil wrongs Defendant Rothschild is liable for during FRB contracted/paid Mark Braswell’s unwarranted and illegal participation in this matter as an DHS agent, acting through FRB contracted/paid local agents Jane Castor and her local concert (SOF; COT; TPD) (Appendix B), to intentionally injured the Plaintiff and his wife physically; emotionally; and monetarily when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324- A, are reasonably proven probable (sum sufficient) in the Appendices:
Count 1: Participation of Defendant Rothschild as an owner/controller/racketeer of DHS; and Jane Castor’s local concert, under F.S. 895.02(1)(a)(b) – – FRB owner/controller level position – – against Rothschild;
134. Imputed/Benefactor/AATF Rothschild, through his FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, was a racketeering AATF/ABTF in concert with DHS; Jane Castor; SOF; COT; TPD; and Crist, to illegally injure both the Plaintiff and his wife physically, emotionally and monetarily, violations under the RICO Act under, but not limited to, F.S. 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6); Sections 1346; 1341; 1343; and 1513, under F.S. 895.02(1)(a)(b); and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A – – against Rothschild;
Count 2: Wrongful Death (768.16), due to Imputed/Benefactor/AATF Rothschild, through SOF’s prosecution of the Plaintiff, with Jane Castor; and DHS/COT/TPD agents having relocated Mrs. Kimball to the streets of Clearwater; Tampa; and Brandon, Florida, telling her each time not to go home, which lasted for 1.5 years until her murder, due to an illegal no contact order on her husband, required in abuse cases, with no one removing this false order still in place, when the Plaintiff had asked his attorneys to do so, along with Mrs. Kimball having asked Matthew McDowell, Esq. to do so (due diligence). Matthew McDowell was the one who wrote Mrs. Kimball’s affidavits for her to sign, and had them to file, but never submitted them with a hearing request (Appendix A); but mainly due to FRB contracted/paid Jane Castor; and COT being a joint and several liability partner in intentional frauds committed with SOF; and OHS on the Plaintiff and his wife – – against Rothschild;
135. Defendant Rothschild’s liable as the proximate cause of his contracted/paid local; state; and federal agents working in concert, initiating the illegal searches; arrests; prosecution; process; murder; and survival action damages committed in this matter, under the Law of Agency; the Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines; and when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324- A;
Count 3: Wrongful Death Damages (768.21) are owed, due to Mrs. Kimball being forced off her medications and made to live on the streets by imputed/benefactor/AATF Rothschild’s contracted/paid DHS/SOF/COT/TPD agents all working in concert, who told Mrs. Kimball she couldn’t go home from 2/2022 to 8-19-23, because of the false no contact order on her husband, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A
– – against Rothschild;
136. Imputed/Benefactor/AATF Rothschild, through his FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, is liable as the proximate cause in all of the damages to the Plaintiff and his wife through his contracted/paid DHS/SOF/COT/TPD agents, by way of the Law of Agency; Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines; and when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324- A;
Count 4: Survival Action for 1.5 years (46.021), due to Mrs. Kimball being forced off her medications and made to live on the streets by FRB contracted/paid DHS/SOF/COT/TPD agents who told Mrs. Kimball from 2/2022 to 8-19-23, not to go home because of the illegal no contact order on her husband, when all FRB contracted/paid agents knew no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A – – against Rothschild;
137. Imputed/Benefactor/AATF Defendant Rothschild, through his FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, is liable for any pain; and suffering, initiated through his contracted/paid agents working at the DHS/COT/TPD/SOF, who made Mrs. Kimball wrongly live on the streets, due to an illegal no contact order on her husband, not on her;
138. And Mrs. Kimball, due to the no contact order being ONLY on her husband, was legally allowed to continue living at home, when the Plaintiff was the sole owner of the property and technically didn’t have to leave;
Count 5: F.S. 782.07(1) (aggravated manslaughter) violation by Rothschild through his FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, financially supported, and still is supporting, Jane Castor; and her local concert of DHS/SOF/COT/TPD agents, who knowingly and intentionally kept Mrs. Kimball in need of the bare necessities in order to survive, on the streets of Clearwater, then again in Tampa, then again in Brandon, for SOF to continue wrongly prosecuting the Plaintiff for violations of probation, when Mrs. Kimball would keep legally returning to her house, turning a blind eyes to her suffering from 2-22 to 8/23, when it knew no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A – – against Rothschild;
139. Imputed/Benefactor/AATF Rothschild, through his FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, is the proximate cause of at least the capable negligence/aggravated manslaughter committed on Mrs. Kimball through his local contracted/paid concert – – DHS; Jane Castor; COT; SOF; and TPD, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324- A; and due to the Law of Agency; Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines;
Count 6: Imputed/Benefactor/AATF Rothschild, is liable for the Plaintiff’s False Imprisonment for 225 Days, a violation under Florida Statute 787.02, due to Defendant Rothschild being a participant in this matter through his FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, when his contracted/paid DHS/SOF/COT/TPD agents, kept the Plaintiff in jail for 225 days, a violation under Florida Statute 787.02, not limited to, RICO Act violations – – Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6); Sections 1346; 1341; 1343; and 1513, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A – – against Rothschild;
140. Imputed/Benefactor/AATF Defendant Rothschild, through his FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, is the proximate cause of the Plaintiff’s three (3) False Imprisonments during case 22-CF-2324-A, initiated by Rothschild’s contracted/paid agents at the DHS/SOF/COT, starting in 2/2022 and ending in 12/2023, RICO Act violations – – Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6); Sections 1346; 1341; 1343; and 1513, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, making Rothschild as liable as his local contracted/paid agents, due to the Law of Agency; Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines; and when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 7: Malicious Prosecution was committed by imputed benefactor AATF Rothschild, when he participated with DHS; Jane Castor; and her local concert (SOF/COT/TPD), by financially supporting all of them, through his FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, for the improper purpose of illegally prosecuting the Plaintiff, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6); Sections 1346; 1341; 1343; Title 18, Chapter 73, Sections 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A – – against Rothschild;
141. Imputed/Benefactor/AATF Defendant Rothschild, through his FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, is the proximate cause of the Plaintiff’s Malicious Prosecution during case 22-CF-2324-A, initiated by Rothschild’s contracted/paid/bribed agents at the DHS/SOF/COT, making Rothschild as liable as his local contracted/paid agents, due to the Law of Agency; Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines, intentional violations of the RICO Act under, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6); Sections 1346; 1341; 1343; 1513, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 8: Abuse of Process was committed by imputed benefactor AATF Rothschild, when he participated with Jane Castor’s local concert, by financially supporting her concert, through his FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, for the improper use of the court system to injure the Plaintiff and his wife physically; emotionally; and monetarily, violations under Title 18, Chapter 73, Sections 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895. Rothschild was a RICO Act AATF participant with Jane Castor’s local concert (DHS/SOF/COT/TPD), committing violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6); Sections 1346; 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A – – against Rothschild;
142. Imputed/Benefactor/AATF Rothschild’s liable as the proximate cause of the abuse of process committed on the plaintiff during court case 22-CF-2324-A, by way of the Law of Agency; Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines; and when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 9: Fraud on the Court (F.S. 1540) was committed in court cases 24-CA-7358 22-CF-2324- A; 21-CF-006147-A; 25-CA-564; 24-CA-7358; and 25-CA-8096, by Rothschild’s contracted/paid local agents, making him the proximate cause of these violations as an Imputed AATF with Jane Castor; COT; SOF; TPD; and DHS – – against Rothschild;
143. Imputed benefactor Rothschild, was a participant AATF with Jane Castor’s FRB contracted/paid local concert, by financially supporting this concert, through his FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, for the purpose of illegally prosecuting the Plaintiff, when Judge Goudie defrauded him herself, and allowed SOF to do the same in her kangaroo court, as if deaf, dumb and blind, when no crime was committed in case 22- CF-2324-A;
Count 10: Title 18, Chapter 73, Section 1513, an FRB retaliation crime, under F.S. 895, implemented by Imputed/Benefactor/AATF Rothschild, through his FRB contracted/paid local concert (DHS/SOF/COT/TPD; and Jane Castor), a Rothschild FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking supported concert, against witnesses (Plaintiff & his wife) – – against Rothschild;
144. Imputed AATF Rothschild’s liable as the proximate cause of DHS; SOF; TPD; COT; and Jane Castor working in concert to retaliate in violation of Section 1513 above, because he knowingly and intentionally financed this concert, through his FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, when it injured the Plaintiff and his wife physically; emotionally; and monetarily, violations of the RICO Act under, but not limited to, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6); Sections 1346; 1341; 1343; 1513, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A. Defendant Rothschild was knowingly a funding and investing source for John Rockefeller’s retaliation plan, after the Plaintiff threatened to sue the FRB through John in 2020, for obtaining the Plaintiff’s laundered inheritance around 2000;
Count 11: Imputed AATF Rothschild, has standing to be sued on all Counts, just like any other FRB owner who was an Imputed AATF accomplice, in his or her contracted/paid agents’ perpetrated wrongs, due to the Law of Agency; Vicarious Liability; Imputation; and Respondeat Superior Doctrines of Law – – against Rothschild;
145. Imputed benefactor AATF Rothschild’s liable as the proximate cause of his agents’ wrongful actions, which caused the Plaintiff and his wife damages, due to Vicarious Liability; Imputation; and Respondeat Superior Doctrines; and the Law of Agency;
Count 12: Fla. Stat. §838.022(a); (b); (c), under F.S. 895, (private and public honest services frauds/scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services, by imputed AATF benefactor Rothschild, was working through his contracted/paid agents: Mark Braswell; Jane Castor; and Ronald DeSantis, Rothschild owned/controlled FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary bank funded, and invested in, agents. With DeSantis who unethically turns blind eyes to John Couris at TGH; Jane Castor at COT; Andrew Warren at SOF; and state courthouse judges, who commit honest services frauds before and after he pays them with Defendant Rothschild’s investment moneys through his dozens of INVESTED IN commercial banks, mostly through his non-banking shell corporations, along with Rothschild agency fund moneys, going through his quasi-government FRB, judges whom presided on cases 24-CA-7358 22-CF-2324-A; 21-CF-006147-A; 25-CA-564; 24-CA-7358; and 25-CA-8096 – – against Rothschild;
146. Imputed AATF benefactor Rothschild’s in violation of both state and federal honest services frauds – – F.S. 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, committed through his local contracted/paid agents at the DHS; COT; SOF; TPD; and TGH, directly and indirectly paid by Defendant Rothschild, through his invested in FRB and invested in FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, most of the time using his contracted/paid State of Florida agent Ronald Desantis, from 2-22 to present.
Count 13: F.S. §112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346), (private and public honest services frauds/scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services, by imputed AATF benefactor Rothschild, was working through his contracted/paid agents: Mark Braswell; Jane Castor; and Ronald DeSantis, Rothschild owned/controlled FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary bank funded, and invested in, agents. With DeSantis who unethically turns blind eyes to John Couris at TGH; Jane Castor at COT; Andrew Warren at SOF; and state courthouse judges, who commit honest services frauds before and after he pays them with Defendant Rothschild’s investment moneys through his dozens of INVESTED IN commercial banks, mostly through his non-banking shell corporations, along with Rothschild agency fund moneys, going through his quasi-government FRB, judges whom presided on cases 24-CA-7358 22-CF-2324-A; 21-CF-006147-A; 25-CA-564; 24-CA-7358; and 25-CA-8096 – – against Rothschild;
147. Imputed AATF benefactor Rothschild’s in violation of both state and federal honest services frauds – – F.S. 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, committed through his local contracted/paid agents at the DHS; COT; SOF; TPD; and TGH, directly and indirectly paid by Defendant Rothschild, through his invested in FRB and invested in FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, most of the time using his contracted/paid State of Florida agent Ronald Desantis, from 2-22 to present.
Count 14: Title 18, Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895, (private and public honest services frauds/scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services, by imputed AATF benefactor Rothschild, was working through his contracted/paid agents: Mark Braswell; Jane Castor; and Ronald DeSantis, Rothschild owned/controlled FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary bank funded, and invested in, agents. With DeSantis who unethically turns blind eyes to John Couris at TGH; Jane Castor at COT; Andrew Warren at SOF; and state courthouse judges, who commit honest services frauds before and after he pays them with Defendant Rothschild’s investment moneys through his dozens of INVESTED IN commercial banks, mostly through his non-banking shell corporations, along with Rothschild agency fund moneys, going through his quasi-government FRB, judges whom presided on cases 24-CA-7358 22-CF-2324-A; 21-CF-006147-A; 25-CA-564; 24-CA-7358; and 25-CA-8096 – – against Rothschild;
148. Imputed AATF benefactor Rothschild’s in violation of both state and federal honest services frauds – – F.S. 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, committed through his local contracted/paid agents at the DHS; COT; SOF; TPD; and TGH, directly and indirectly paid by Defendant Rothschild, through his invested in FRB and invested in FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, most of the time using his contracted/paid State of Florida agent Ronald Desantis, from 2-22 to present.
Count 15: F.S. Chapter 817.155, (private and public honest services frauds/scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services, by imputed AATF benefactor Rothschild, was working through his contracted/paid agents: Mark Braswell; Jane Castor; and Ronald DeSantis, Rothschild owned/controlled FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary bank funded, and invested in, agents. With DeSantis who unethically turns blind eyes to John Couris at TGH; Jane Castor at COT; Andrew Warren at SOF; and state courthouse judges, who commit honest services frauds before and after he pays them with Defendant Rothschild’s investment moneys through his dozens of INVESTED IN commercial banks, mostly through his non-banking shell corporations, along with Rothschild agency fund moneys, going through his quasi-government FRB, judges whom presided on cases 24-CA-7358 22-CF-2324-A; 21-CF-006147-A; 25-CA-564; 24-CA-7358; and 25-CA-8096 – – against Rothschild;
149. Imputed AATF benefactor Rothschild’s in violation of both state and federal honest services frauds – – F.S. 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, committed through his local contracted/paid agents at the DHS; COT; SOF; TPD; and TGH, directly and indirectly paid by Defendant Rothschild, through his invested in FRB and invested in FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, most of the time using his contracted/paid State of Florida agent Ronald Desantis, from 2-22 to present.
Count 16: Spoliation of Mrs. Kimball’s TGH medical records under Florida RCP 1.380(b)(2), by Rothschild’s funded/invested in local private agent John Couris – – against Rothschild;
150. Imputed/Benefactor/AATF Rothschild’s liable for Mrs. Kimball’s injuries as if he had caused them before her accident on 8-19-23, by HIS TGH funded/invested in private agent, John Couris, having spoliated Mrs. Kimball’s medical record evidence through TGH, to hide the proximate cause of her death, stopping Rothschild from having to reimburse TGH;
Count 17: Florida Chapter 843, Obstructing Justice 843.14, Compounding Felony violation against Rothschild;
151. Imputed/Benefactor/AATF Rothschild’s liable for knowingly and intentionally committing a criminal violation of obstructing justice, when he through his contracted/paid local agents at TGH, concealed Mrs. Kimball’s medical records, because she was in fact murdered;
Count 18: Fraud on the Court violation in case 24-CA-7358 (F.S. 1540) – – against Rothschild;
152. Imputed/Benefactor/AATF Rothschild’s liable for knowingly and intentionally through his contracted/paid agents John Couris and Ronald Desantis, having committed Frauds on the Court in cases 24-CA-7358 and 25-CA-7358, when they stated that the Plaintiff wasn’t married to Mrs. Kimball.
Count 19: 4th amendment right violations – – against Rothschild;
153. Defendant Rothschild through his contracted/paid DHS/COT/SOF/TPD agents violated the Plaintiff and his wife’s rights to not have their house searched; property stolen; converted; and damaged during 3 illegal TPD searches; and a fourth (4) illegal one by federal marshals after Judge Lynn Goudie issued a false warrant for the Plaintiff’s arrest, because he supposedly knew his wife was around the corner at the northern intersection from his home address, when he was driving his car down his block. Marshals used his illegally obtained house keys from within his pocket for 45 minutes, to go to his house and search it, permanently keeping his wallet with its full contents, possibly for SOF/COT/TPD to go through, but it was never to be seen by the Plaintiff again;
154. Defendant Rothschild through his contracted/paid agents at the DHS/SOF/COT/TPD, an illegal concert, the Plaintiff was illegally arrested on: 2-24-22; and again by federal marshals on the street a few months later, complements of criminal minded Lynn Goudie; and a third time on 7-26-23;
155. Defendant Rothschild through his contracted/paid agents at the DHS/SOF/COT/TPD, illegally imprisoned the Plaintiff for 225 days in total;
156. Defendant Rothschild through his contracted/paid agents at the DHS/SOF/COT/TPD, and illegal concert, illegally removed Mrs. Kimball from her home, or made her leave it, each time they found her at home, keeping her on the streets to be foreseeably injured or killed.
Relief sought:
157. Money amounts the Plaintiff is seeking from Defendant Rothschild in this complaint for personal injuries:
A. Economic damages amount to roughly $400,000. USD for Mrs. Kimball’s lost SSI income from age
41 to 75 (34 years’ worth);
B. about $1,050. USD for the Plaintiff being extorted into paying the court costs on bogus case 22-CF-2324-A;
C. $60,000. USO for Rothschild, through DHS; COT/TPD; and Jane Castor, stealing and damaging
$20,000. USO of the Plaintiff and his wife’s properties within their home, during two (2) illegal TPD searches, implemented on 2-24-22 and 7-26-23, violations under F.S. §772.11 (1), 5 years statute of limitations, see court documents Appendix B. This Defendant has now been given 30 days to pay the Plaintiff $60,000. USO. (Appendix B & court case 22-CF-2324-A) (Attorney Joseph Davis, the Plaintiff’s former attorney, is a witness to the thefts and damages);
D. Rothschild through TPD’s illegal search of Plaintiff’s house on 7-26-23, due to no search warrant, cost him $3,500. USD in legal fees from Attorney Joseph Davis; and
E. the Plaintiff’s punitive and non-economic amounts for his own personal pain and suffering, along with Mrs. Kimball’s personal injury – – 1.5 years’ of being made to survive on the streets, all non-economic/punitive, intentional/culpable, torts/scams, committed by Rothschild’s contracted/paid agents, total well over $60. million USO, by referencing verdicts on similar federal and state violations.
158. Counts; with elements of; and statute violations for Defendant Crist:
159. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations and legal precedence set forth in paragraphs 1 through 109; and 113 through 124 as if fully set forth herein:
The Plaintiff is seeking compensation (relief) from the Defendant Crist, due to being Mrs. Kimball’s spouse and under Law of Agency; Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines; for being the defendant in bogus case 22-CF-2324-A; and the Plaintiff in case 25-CA-8096:
The criminal/civil wrongs Defendant Crist is liable for during case 25-CA-8096, were intentional torts to injure (see Appendix E).
FRB contracted/paid Victor Crist’s unwarranted and illegal participation in this matter, acting through his FRB contracted/paid local courthouse agents to intentionally injure the Plaintiff emotionally; and monetarily when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A, are reasonably proven probable (sum sufficient) in the Appendices:
Count 1: Defendant Crist was a managing participant under F.S. 895.02(1)(a)(b), which makes him liable for damages under the Law of agency; Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines – – against Crist;
160. Crist racketeered in concert with Jane Castor’s concert using his own immediate agents at the state courthouse, in violation of the Law of Agency; Imputation; Repondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines, by illegally transferring the Plaintiff’s state case 25-CA-8096 to the federal courthouse so it could be illegally dismissed under federal common laws, when it was a state case governed by state common laws (shotgun pleading laws don’t apply in state court).
Count 2: Fraud on the Court (F.S. 1540) in court cases 25-CV- 3077 was assisted by Crist, due to being a participant under the RICO Act with Judge Barber and the FRB, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; Title 18, Chapter 73, Sections 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no court order was submitted by Judge Nash with a required hearing in case 25-CA-8096 for it to be transferred by the Clerk of the Court – – against Crist;
161. Crist was a concert member involved in the illegal transfer of the Plaintiff state case, acting as a racketeering participant under the RICO Act, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; Title 18, Chapter 73, Sections 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A – – against Crist;
Count 3: Title 18, Chapter 73, Section 1513, under F.S. 895, an FRB retaliation crime initiated through Defendant Crist by Fisher & Phillips – – against Crist;
162. Crist was working in concert with the law firm of Fisher & Phillips, LLP; hired by the FRB, to commit retaliatory acts for the purpose of emotional; and monetary injuring the Plaintiff, committed in violation of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; Title 18, Chapter 73, Sections 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, as an accessory after the fact (AATF) with Jane Castor’s local concert, having committed racketeering during case 22-CF-2324-A, implemented by the John Rockefeller and his think tank, after the Plaintiff threatened to sue the FRB through John in 2020 for obtaining his laundered inheritance beginning around 2000;
Count 4: Crist has standing to be sued for agent perpetrated wrongs on all his Courts cited in this Count section, due to the Law of Agency; Vicarious Liability; Imputation; and Respondeat Superior Doctrines – – against Crist;
163. Crist is liable for any of its employees’ wrongful actions and omissions which caused the Plaintiff damages, due to Vicarious Liability; Imputation; Respondeat Superior Doctrines and the Law of Agency;
Count 5: Fla. Stat. §838.022(a); (b); (c), under F.S. 895, (private and public honest services frauds/scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services during case 25-CA-8096;
164. Defendant Crist’s in violation of both state and federal honest services frauds – – F.S. 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, committed through his local contracted/paid agents at the 13th Judicial Circuit, directly and indirectly paid by the FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, through the BOCC most of the time, using FRB contracted/paid State of Florida agent Ronald Desantis;
Count 6: F.S. §112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346), (private and public honest services frauds/scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services during case 25-CA-8096;
165. Defendant Crist’s in violation of both state and federal honest services frauds – – F.S. 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, committed through his local contracted/paid agents at the 13th Judicial Circuit, directly and indirectly paid by the FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, through the BOCC most of the time, using FRB contracted/paid State of Florida agent Ronald Desantis;
Count 7: Title 18, Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895, (private and public honest services frauds/scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services during case 25-CA-8096;
166. Defendant Crist’s in violation of both state and federal honest services frauds – – F.S. 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, committed through his local contracted/paid agents at the 13th Judicial Circuit, directly and indirectly paid by the FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, through the BOCC most of the time, using FRB contracted/paid State of Florida agent Ronald Desantis;
Count 8: F.S. Chapter 817.155, (private and public honest services frauds/scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services during case 25-CA-8096;
167. Defendant Crist’s in violation of both state and federal honest services frauds – – F.S. 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, committed through his local contracted/paid agents at the 13th Judicial Circuit, directly and indirectly paid by the FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, through the BOCC most of the time, using FRB contracted/paid State of Florida agent Ronald Desantis;
Count 9: 5th amendment right violations for illegally acting as a judge in place of Judge Nash – – against Crist;
168. Crist is liable for the false transfer of case 25-CA-8096 to federal court, case 25-CV- 3077, so this case could be illegally dismissed there, using an inappropriate case law, currently being used on the Plaintiff in federal case 25-CV-2181 (appealed), without the proper jurisdiction (4 Defendant already were being sued there under the same Counts), when he knew no official judicial court order was issued to do so by state judge Nash in case 25-CA-8096;
Count 10: Tortious Interference under F.S.
768.72/§§ 95.11(3)(o & p) – – against Crist;
169. (1) Crist is liable for any intentional or culpable acts or omissions, which caused injuries to the Plaintiff, when he acted as an accessory after the fact (AATF) in covering up Mrs. Kimball’s murder, by aiding and abetting both the FRB and their paid local law firm, Fisher & Phillips LLP, in spoliating critical evidence of her murder, a culpable or intentional tort, and costing the Plaintiff additional time and moneys;
170. (2) Crist is liable as an accessory after the fact (AATF) in at least the aggravated manslaughter of Mrs. Kimball, for aiding and abetting as an AATF, in concealing medical record evidence in cases 25-CA-8096, by violating Sections 1341; 1343; Chapter 817.155; and Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); and 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346) – – mail; wire; and honest services frauds as an accomplice with Fisher & Phillips LLP and the judge in case 25-CV-3077;
171. (3) The FRB and their hired law firm Fisher & Phillips working through Crist, were participants under Title 18, Chapter 96, Sections 1962(c & d) under the RICO Act;
172. (4) Crist was working in concert as an FRB contracted/paid member in an association-in-fact enterprise, during cases 25-CV-8096 and 25-CV- 3077 which lasted a day, as an unwelcomed tortious interferer (intruder) to these cases, aiding and abetting in concealing evidence of Mrs. Kimball’s murder by either Defendant Dawson and/or TGH;
Count 11: 14th amendment right violation – – Crist is liable for violating the Plaintiff’s
14th amendment rights, due to having managed the illegal transfer of case 25-CA-8096 to case 25- CV-3077, from inside the 13th Judicial Circuit –
– against Crist;
173. Crist violated the Plaintiff and his wife’s 14th amendment rights, to both substantive and procedural due process rights in case 25-CA- 8096, by illegally transferring this case out of the courthouse, when he knew no official judicial court order was issued to do so by state judge Nash;
Count 12: Honest Services Fraud violations – – Crist committed honest services frauds under Fla. Stat. §838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); federal Sections 1341; 1343 under F.S. 896; and Chapter 817.155, during case 25-CA-8096, a public scams to defraud Plaintiff out of honest services directly at the local courthouse – – against Crist;
174. Crist committed state and federal honest services frauds violations in cases 25-CA-8096 and 25-CV-3077, by misrepresenting through his agents, that either the Federal courthouse or the law firm Fisher & Phillips LLP, was to blame for the false transfer of case 25-CA-8096 to federal court, when he knew an official judicial court order was needed to do so by state judge Nash;
Count 13: Florida Chapter 843, Obstructing Justice 843.14, Compounding Felony violation against Crist;
175. Crist knowingly and intentionally committed a criminal violation of obstructing justice when he illegally transferred case 25-CA-8096 to conceal Mrs. Kimball’s medical records to benefit TGH; and its funding and investing sources the State of Florida and the FRB, because she was in fact murdered, which involved the FRB and its contracted/paid commercial subsidiary banking agents;
Count 14: Spoliation of medical and video records under Florida RCP 1.380(b)(2) – – against Crist;
176. Crist is liable for all of Mrs. Kimball’s injuries as if he caused them, by being an accessory after the fact in spoliating both her murder video (SOF) and medical record evidence (TGH), as to who was involved, and how exactly her death was caused.
Relief sought:
177. Money amounts the Plaintiff’s seeking from Defendant Crist in this complaint for personal injuries:
A. Any Economic damage amounts lost during this
new case filed in state court a SECOND TIME WITHOUT Judge Nash – – roughly $400,000. USD for Mrs. Kimball’s lost SSI income from age 41 to 75 (34 years’ worth);
B. 50% shared expense by SOF; and TPD, in
$60,000. USO owed, for TPD stealing and damaging
$20,000. USO of the Plaintiff and his wife’s properties within their home, during two (2) illegal TPD searches, implemented on 2-24-22 & 7-26-23, violations under F.S. §772.11 (1), 5 year statute of limitations, see court documents Appendix B. COT has now been given 30 days to pay the Plaintiff $30,000. USO. (Appendix B & court case 22-CF-2324-A) (Attorney Joseph Davis, the Plaintiff’s former attorney, is a witness to the thefts and damages);
C. 100% in TPD’s illegal search of Plaintiff’s
house on 7-26-23, due to no search warrant while still being illegally prosecuted by SOF up until 12/2023, costing him $3,500. USO in legal fees from Attorney Joseph Davis – – so $1,750 USO is the amount both SOF and COT owe the Plaintiff;
D. the Plaintiff’s punitive and non-economic amounts for his own personal pain and suffering, along with Mrs. Kimball’s personal injury – –
1.5 years’ of being made to survive on the streets by FRB/DHS/SOF/COT/TPD; and Jane Castor, all non-economic/punitive, intentional/culpable, torts/scams, all committed by FRB contracted/paid agents, total well over $60. million USD, by referencing verdicts on similar federal and state violations.
178. Counts; with elements of; and statute violations for Defendant Chase:
179. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations and legal precedence set forth in paragraphs 1 through 109; and 113 through 130 as if fully set forth herein, and Defendant Rothschild being the proximate cause thereof.
The Plaintiff is seeking compensation (relief) from the Defendant Chase, due to being Mrs. Kimball’s spouse and under Law of Agency; Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines; and for being the defendant in bogus case 22-CF-2324-A:
The criminal/civil wrongs Defendant Chase is liable for during FRB contracted/paid Mark Braswell’s unwarranted and illegal participation in this matter as an DHS agent, acting through FRB contracted/paid local agents Jane Castor and her local concert (SOF; COT; TPD) (Appendix B), to intentionally injured the Plaintiff and his wife physically; emotionally; and monetarily when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324- A, are reasonably proven probable (sum sufficient) in the Appendices:
Count 1: Participation of Defendant Chase as an funder/investor of DHS; and Jane Castor’s local concert, including Defendant Crist, under F.S. 895.02(1)(a)(b) – – FRB owner/controller level position – – against Chase;
180. Imputed/Benefactor/ABTF/AATF Chase, through its FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, was a racketeering ABTF/AATF in concert with DHS; Jane Castor; SOF; COT; TPD; and Crist, to illegally injure both the Plaintiff and his wife physically, emotionally and monetarily, violations under the RICO Act under, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a);(b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6); Section 1346; 1341; 1343; 1513; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A – – against Chase;
Count 2: Wrongful Death (768.16), due to Imputed/Benefactor/ABTF/AATF Chase, through SOF’s prosecution of the Plaintiff, with Jane Castor; and DHS/COT/TPD agents having relocated Mrs. Kimball to the streets of Clearwater; Tampa; and Brandon, Florida, telling her each time not to go home, which lasted for 1.5 years until her murder, due to an illegal no contact order on her husband, required in abuse cases, with no one removing this false order still in place, when the Plaintiff had asked his attorneys to do so, along with Mrs. Kimball having asked Matthew McDowell, Esq. to do so (due diligence). Matthew McDowell was the one who wrote Mrs. Kimball’s affidavits for her to sign, and had them to file, but never submitted them with a hearing request (Appendix A); but mainly due to FRB contracted/paid Jane Castor; and COT being a joint and several liability partner in intentional frauds committed with SOF; and OHS on the Plaintiff and his wife – – against Chase;
181. Defendant Chase’s liable as the proximate cause of its contracted/paid local; state; and federal agents working in concert, initiating the illegal searches; arrests; prosecution; process; murder; and survival action damages committed in this matter, under the Law of Agency; the Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines; and when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324- A;
Count 3: Wrongful Death Damages (768.21) are owed, due to Mrs. Kimball being forced off her medications and made to live on the streets by imputed/benefactor/AATF Rothschild’s contracted/paid DHS/SOF/COT/TPD agents all working in concert, who told Mrs. Kimball she couldn’t go home from 2/2022 to 8-19-23, because of the false no contact order on her husband, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A
– – against Chase;
182. Imputed/Benefactor/ABTF/AATF Chase, through its FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, is liable as the proximate cause in all of the damages to the Plaintiff and his wife through his contracted/paid DHS/SOF/COT/TPD agents, by way of the Law of Agency; Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines; and when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324- A;
Count 4: Survival Action for 1.5 years (46.021), due to Mrs. Kimball being forced off her medications and made to live on the streets by FRB contracted/paid DHS/SOF/COT/TPD agents who told Mrs. Kimball from 2/2022 to 8-19-23, not to go home because of the illegal no contact order on her husband, when all FRB contracted/paid agents knew no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A – – against Chase;
183. Imputed/Benefactor/ABTF/AATF Defendant Chase, through its FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, is liable for any pain; and suffering, initiated through its contracted/paid agents working at the DHS/COT/TPD/SOF, who made Mrs. Kimball wrongly live on the streets, due to an illegal no contact order on her husband, not on her;
184. And Mrs. Kimball, due to the no contact order being ONLY on her husband, was legally allowed to continue living at home, when the Plaintiff was the sole owner of the property and technically didn’t have to leave;
Count 5: F.S. 782.07(1) (aggravated manslaughter) violation by Chase through its FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, financially supported, and still is supporting, Jane Castor; and her local concert of DHS/SOF/COT/TPD agents, who knowingly and intentionally kept Mrs. Kimball in need of the bare necessities in order to survive, on the streets of Clearwater, then again in Tampa, then again in Brandon, for SOF to continue wrongly prosecuting the Plaintiff for violations of probation, when Mrs. Kimball would keep legally returning to her house, turning a blind eyes to her suffering from 2-22 to 8/23, when it knew no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A – – against Chase;
185. Imputed/Benefactor/ABTF/AATF Chase, through its FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, is the proximate cause of at least the capable negligence/aggravated manslaughter committed on Mrs. Kimball through its local contracted/paid concert – – DHS; Jane Castor; COT; SOF; and TPD, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324- A; and due to the Law of Agency; Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines;
Count 6: Imputed/Benefactor/ABTF/AATF Chase, is liable for the Plaintiff’s False Imprisonment for 225 Days, a violation under Florida Statute 787.02, due to Defendant Chase being a participant in this matter through its FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, when its contracted/paid DHS/SOF/COT/TPD agents, kept the Plaintiff in jail for 225 days, a violation under Florida Statute 787.02, not limited to, RICO Act violations – – Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; 1513, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A – – against Chase;
186. Imputed/Benefactor/ABTF/AATF Defendant Chase, through his FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, is the proximate cause of the Plaintiff’s three (3) False Imprisonments during case 22-CF-2324-A, initiated by Rothschild’s contracted/paid agents at the DHS/SOF/COT, starting in 2/2022 and ending in 12/2023, RICO Act violations – – Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; 1513, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A, making Chase as liable as its local contracted/paid agents, due to the Law of Agency; Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines; and when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 7: Malicious Prosecution was committed by imputed benefactor ABTF/AATF Chase, when it participated with DHS; Jane Castor; and her local concert (SOF/COT/TPD), by financially supporting all of them, through its FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, for the improper purpose of illegally prosecuting the Plaintiff, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); & (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; Title 18, Chapter 73, Sections 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A – – against Chase;
187. Imputed/Benefactor/ABTF/AATF Defendant Chase, through its FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, is the proximate cause of the Plaintiff’s Malicious Prosecution during case 22-CF-2324-A, initiated by Chase’s contracted/paid/bribed agents at the DHS/SOF/COT, making Chase as liable as its local contracted/paid agents, due to the Law of Agency; Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines, intentional violations of the RICO Act under, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; 1513, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 8: Abuse of Process was committed by imputed benefactor ABTF/AATF Chase, when it participated with Jane Castor’s local concert, by financially supporting her concert, through his FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, for the improper use of the court system to injure the Plaintiff and his wife physically; emotionally; and monetarily, violations under Title 18, Chapter 73, Sections 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895. Chase was a RICO Act ABTF/AATF participant with Jane Castor’s local concert (DHS/SOF/COT/TPD), committing violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A – – against Chase;
188. Imputed/Benefactor/ABTF/AATF Chase’s liable as the proximate cause of the abuse of process committed on the plaintiff during court case 22-CF-2324-A, by way of the Law of Agency; Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines; and when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 9: Fraud on the Court (F.S. 1540) was committed in court cases 24-CA-7358 22-CF-2324- A; 21-CF-006147-A; 25-CA-564; 24-CA-7358; and 25-CA-8096, by Chase’s contracted/paid local agents, making it the proximate cause of these violations as an Imputed ABTF/AATF with Jane Castor; COT; SOF; TPD; and DHS – – against Chase;
189. Imputed benefactor Chase, was a participant ABTF/AATF with Jane Castor’s FRB contracted/paid local concert, by financially supporting this concert, through its FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, for the purpose of illegally prosecuting the Plaintiff, when Judge Goudie defrauded him herself, and allowed SOF to do the same in her kangaroo court, as if deaf, dumb and blind, when no crime was committed in case 22- CF-2324-A;
Count 10: Title 18, Chapter 73, Section 1513, an FRB retaliation crime, under F.S. 895, implemented by Imputed/Benefactor/ABTF/AATF Chase, through its FRB contracted/paid local concert (DHS/SOF/COT/TPD; and Jane Castor), a Chase FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking supported concert, against witnesses (Plaintiff & his wife) – – against Chase;
190. Imputed ABTF/AATF Chase’s liable as the proximate cause of DHS; SOF; TPD; COT; and Jane Castor working in concert to retaliate in violation of Section 1513 above, because it knowingly and intentionally financed this concert, through its FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, when it injured the Plaintiff and his wife physically; emotionally; and monetarily, violations of the RICO Act under, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; 1513, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A. Defendant Chase was knowingly a funding and investing source for John Rockefeller’s retaliation plan, after the Plaintiff threatened to sue the FRB through John in 2020, for obtaining the Plaintiff’s laundered inheritance around 2000;
Count 11: Imputed ABTF/AATF Chase, has standing to be sued on all Counts, just like any other FRB owner who was an Imputed AATF accomplice, in his or her contracted/paid agents’ perpetrated wrongs, due to the Law of Agency; Vicarious Liability; Imputation; and Respondeat Superior Doctrines of Law – – against Chase;
191. Imputed benefactor ABTF/AATF chase’s liable as the proximate cause of his agents’ wrongful actions, which caused the Plaintiff and his wife damages, due to Vicarious Liability; Imputation; and Respondeat Superior Doctines; and the Law of Agency;
Count 12: Fla. Stat. §838.022(a); (b); (c), under F.S. 895, (private and public honest services frauds/scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services, by imputed ABTF/AATF benefactor Chase, working through its contracted/paid agent Ronald Desantis, a Chase FRB and Chase FRB commercial subsidiary bank funded, and invested in, agent, who unethically turns a blind eye to John Couris at TGH and state courthouse judges, who commit honest services frauds before and after he pays them with Defendant Chase’s moneys, some of
whom presided on cases 24-CA-7358 22-CF-2324-A; 21-CF-006147-A; 25-CA-564; 24-CA-7358; and 25-CA-8096 – – against Chase;
192. Imputed ABTF/AATF benefactor Chase’s in violation of both state and federal honest services frauds – – F.S. 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Seciton 1346); Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, committed through its local contracted/paid agents at the DHS; COT; SOF; TPD; and TGH, directly and indirectly paid by Defendant Chase through its FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, most of the time using its contracted/paid State of Florida agent Ronald Desantis, from 2-22 to present.
Count 13: F.S. §112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346), (private and public honest services frauds/scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services, by imputed ABTF/AATF benefactor Chase, working through its contracted/paid agent Ronald Desantis, a Chase FRB and Chase FRB commercial subsidiary bank funded, and invested in, agent, who unethically turns a blind eye to John Couris at TGH and state courthouse judges, who commit honest services frauds before and after he pays them with Defendant Chase’s moneys, some of
whom presided on cases 24-CA-7358 22-CF-2324-A; 21-CF-006147-A; 25-CA-564; 24-CA-7358; and 25-CA-8096 – – against Chase;
193. Imputed ABTF/AATF benefactor Chase’s in violation of both state and federal honest services frauds – – F.S. 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, committed through its local contracted/paid agents at the DHS; COT; SOF; TPD; and TGH, directly and indirectly paid by Defendant Chase through its FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, most of the time using its contracted/paid State of Florida agent Ronald Desantis, from 2-22 to present.
Count 14: Title 18, Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895, (private and public honest services frauds/scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services, by imputed ABTF/AATF benefactor Chase, working through its contracted/paid agent Ronald Desantis, a Chase FRB and Chase FRB commercial subsidiary bank funded, and invested in, agent, who unethically turns a blind eye to John Couris at TGH and state courthouse judges, who commit honest services frauds before and after he pays them with Defendant Chase’s moneys, some of
whom presided on cases 24-CA-7358 22-CF-2324-A; 21-CF-006147-A; 25-CA-564; 24-CA-7358; and 25-CA-8096 – – against Chase;
194. Imputed ABTF/AATF benefactor Chase’s in violation of both state and federal honest services frauds – – F.S. 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, committed through its local contracted/paid agents at the DHS; COT; SOF; TPD; and TGH, directly and indirectly paid by Defendant Chase through its FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, most of the time using its contracted/paid State of Florida agent Ronald Desantis, from 2-22 to present.
Count 15: F.S. Chapter 817.155, (private and public honest services frauds/scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services, by imputed ABTF/AATF benefactor Chase, working through its contracted/paid agent Ronald Desantis, a Chase FRB and Chase FRB commercial subsidiary bank funded, and invested in, agent, who unethically turns a blind eye to John Couris at TGH and state courthouse judges, who commit honest services frauds before and after he pays them with Defendant Chase’s moneys, some of
whom presided on cases 24-CA-7358 22-CF-2324-A; 21-CF-006147-A; 25-CA-564; 24-CA-7358; and 25-CA-8096 – – against Chase;
195. Imputed ABTF/AATF benefactor Chase’s in violation of both state and federal honest services frauds – – F.S. 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, committed through its local contracted/paid agents at the DHS; COT; SOF; TPD; and TGH, directly and indirectly paid by Defendant Chase through its FRB and FRB commercial subsidiary investment banking corporations, most of the time using its contracted/paid State of Florida agent Ronald Desantis, from 2-22 to present.
Count 16: Imputed/Benefactor/ABTF/AATF Chase’s liable for the theft; conversion; and destruction of the Plaintiff and his wife’s properties within their house, committed by both TPD and SOF, due to no legitimate search warrant and no material evidence of a crime committed in case 22-CF-2324-A, violations under F.S. 771.11(1) & 812.014, compensation now owed to the Plaintiff – – 100% on $60,000. USD, before and during case 22-CF-2324-A (crimes committed on both 2-24-22 & 7-26-23) – – against Chase;
196. Imputed/Benefactor/ABTF/AATF Chase’s contracted/paid local agents committed theft; conversion; and destruction of Plaintiff and his wife’s properties within their house, which it is now liable for;
Count 17: Spoliation of Mrs. Kimball’s TGH medical records under Florida RCP 1.380(b)(2), by Chase’s funded/invested in local private agent John Couris – – against Chase;
197. Imputed/Benefactor/ABTF/AATF Chase’s liable for Mrs. Kimball’s injuries as if it had caused them before her accident on 8-19-23, by ITS TGH funded/invested in private agent, John Couris, having spoliated Mrs. Kimball’s medical record evidence through TGH, to hide the proximate cause of her death, stopping Chase from having to reimburse TGH;
Count 18: Florida Chapter 843, Obstructing Justice 843.14, Compounding Felony violation against Chase;
198. Imputed/Benefactor/ABTF/AATF Chase’s liable for knowingly and intentionally committing a criminal violation of obstructing justice, when it through its contracted/paid local agents at TGH, concealed Mrs. Kimball’s medical records, because she was in fact murdered;
Count 19: Fraud on the Court violation in case 24-CA-7358 (F.S. 1540) – – against Chase;
199. Imputed/Benefactor/ABTF/AATF Chase’s liable for knowingly and intentionally through its contracted/paid agents: John Couris and Ronald Desantis, having committed Frauds on the Court in cases 24-CA-7358 and 25-CA-7358, when they stated that the Plaintiff wasn’t married to Mrs. Kimball.
Count 20: 4th amendment right violations – – against Chase;
200. Defendant Chase through its contracted/paid DHS/COT/SOF/TPD agents violated the Plaintiff and his wife’s rights to not have their house searched; property stolen; converted; and damaged during 3 illegal TPD searches; and a fourth (4) illegal one by federal marshals after Judge Lynn Goudie issued a false warrant for the Plaintiff’s arrest, because he supposedly knew his wife was around the corner at the northern intersection from his home address, when he was driving his car down his block. Marshals used his illegally obtained house keys from within his pocket for 45 minutes, to go to his house and search it, permanently keeping his wallet with its full contents, possibly for SOF/COT/TPD to go through, but it was never to be seen by the Plaintiff again;
201. Due Defendant Chase through its contracted/paid agents at the DHS/SOF/COT/TPD, an illegal concert, the Plaintiff was illegally arrested on: 2-24-22; and again by federal marshals on the street a few months later, complements of criminal minded Lynn Goudie; and a third time on 7-26-23;
202. Defendant Chase through its contracted/paid agents at the DHS/SOF/COT/TPD, illegally imprisoned the Plaintiff for 225 days in total;
203. Defendant chase through its contracted/paid agents at the DHS/SOF/COT/TPD, and illegal concert, illegally removed Mrs. Kimball from her home and kept her from living in it, each time they found her at home, keeping her on the streets to be foreseeably injured or killed.
Relief sought:
204. Money amounts the Plaintiff is seeking from Defendant Chase in this complaint for personal injuries:
A. Economic damages amount to roughly $400,000. USD for Mrs. Kimball’s lost SSI income from age
41 to 75 (34 years’ worth);
B. about $1,050. USD for the Plaintiff being extorted into paying the court costs on bogus case 22-CF-2324-A;
C. $60,000. USO for Chase, through DHS; COT/TPD; and Jane Castor, stealing and damaging
$20,000. USO of the Plaintiff and his wife’s properties within their home, during two (2) illegal TPD searches, implemented on 2-24-22 and 7-26-23, violations under F.S. §772.11 (1), 5 years statute of limitations, see court documents Appendix B. This Defendant has now been given 30 days to pay the Plaintiff $60,000. USD. (Appendix B & court case 22-CF-2324-A) (Attorney Joseph Davis, the Plaintiff’s former attorney, is a witness to the thefts and damages);
D. Chase through TPD’s illegal search of Plaintiff’s house on 7-26-23, due to no search warrant, cost him $3,500. USD in legal fees from Attorney Joseph Davis; and
E. the Plaintiff’s punitive and non-economic amounts for his own personal pain and suffering, along with Mrs. Kimball’s personal injury – – 1.5 years’ of being made to survive on the streets, all non-economic/punitive, intentional/culpable, torts/scams, committed by Chase’s contracted/paid agents, total well over $60. million USO, by referencing verdicts on similar federal and state violations.
205. Elements of the Causes of Action – – statutory, common law or duty of care violations resulting in injuries:
206. All of the Defendants had a direct, or indirect duty through their contracted/paid agents, not to breach multiple state and federal statutes either capably, but mainly intentionally, injuring the Plaintiff and his wife, compensation now owed to them.
207. Prayer for Relief:
208. The relief sought from all of the Defendants is punitive and compensatory, with attorney’s fee and costs provided when applicable.
209. Expedited Trial by Jury is asked for.
Affidavit of Verification:
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH
I, Darryl Schneider, being duly sworn, deposes and say: I the Plaintiff in the above entitled action, have read the foregoing complaint and know the contents of it, and say that to the best of my knowledge, its “contents” ARE TRUE and CORRECT.
______________________________________Signature
Subscribed and sworn before me on _____________________to certify which witness signed by my hand and official seal. Driver License# ______________________________________
__________________________________________Name
______________________________________Signature
___________________________Notary Public State of Florida Seal
Certificate of Service:
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was placed into the case file with notification to each Defendant.
Darryl Schneider Plaintiff
_________________________
Signature
10406 N 26 Street
Tampa, FL 33612
813-585-0552
Adverse Parties:
1. Alex Rothschild
c/o Rothschild & Co. US Inc.
33 Floor
1251 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020
USA
212-403-3500
2. Victor Crist
7126 Wareham Drive
Tampa, FL 33647
3. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
270 Park Avenue
New York City, NY 10017
c/o
CT Corporation System
28 Liberty Street
42nd Floor
New York, NY 10005
Circuit Civil Division of The
13th Judicial Circuit, Tampa,
Florida
Appendix A: Cases 25-CA-564 & 24-CA-7358
Appendix B: Cases 22-CF-2324-A & 21-CF-006147-A
Appendix C: Competency Evaluation
Appendix D: FRB Investments
Appendix E: Films
Appendix F: NCUA & TBFCU
Appendix G: Common Laws
Appendix H: Fraudulent Transfer of Case 25-CA-8096
In The 13th Judicial Circuit
Tampa, Florida Division
1. Darryl Schneider
Plaintiff
Case 25-CA-11800
1. David Dawson II
Sued as an Individual
2. Tampa General Hospital (TGH)
3. City of Tampa (COT)
4. State of Florida (SOF)
Defendants
___________________________/
Amended Complaint on 12-8-25
1. Main Introduction:
Every statement in this complaint is unambiguous, and not only sum sufficiently believable to a reasonably prudent person on its face (“four corners” rule), but clearly proven as seen by reviewing the appendices. Any arguments pled in writing by any officer of the court, including the judge, NOT based on material evidence submitted, and used as a false means to dismiss this case, is an attempt to violate F.S. 838.022(a); (b); (c); 12.3173(e)(6) (same as Title, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817 – – 817.155 (tortious interference with state constitutional objectives, by obstructing the executive & judiciary with bribes). All the statements made in this complaint are relevant facts, written as SHORT AS POSSIBLE WITHOUT ARGUMENT, when there were rather large numbers of FRB contracted/paid retaliatory pubic and private agents, relentlessly out to injure both the Plaintiff and his wife!
2. All of the Defendants cited in this complaint, have sum sufficiently been proven guilty of having capably or intentionally participated in specific violations of either the: 1) RICO Act; 2) constitutional amendment rights; 3) state and federal statutes; 4) duty to render aid; or 4) state and federal common laws, which resulted in Mrs. Kimball’s death, either as an intentional or culpable tort (murder under F.S. 782.04(1)(a), or aggravated manslaughter under F.S. 782.07(1)). Unfortunately it cannot be determined which type of murder was committed on Mrs. Kimball and by whom, due to the concealment of 1) medical records and the 2) full FHP murder video, by respectively John Couris and State of Florida (SOF) through FHP.
***3. This is strictly an original jurisdiction, state case, to be only heard in state court, on only state violations of law. Defendants are only being sued on state law violations in this case, and are not to respond to any federal law violations cited! The citing of, not the judicial acting on, of federal law violations in state complaints is allowed. And all Defendants are technically citizens of Florida! This is not a diversity case, and only state statutory violations of law are cited within the count sections! State court is the MASTER PLAINTIFF’S jurisdictional choice for this case, and he alone chooses!
4. This complaint’s viewable online for more participants to become plaintiffs in class action lawsuits against the private FRB owners. The Corner Post, Inc. Vs. Federal Reserve case, proves private FRB owners do exist, and are allowed to be sued individually or through any one of their banking cartels they own as individual entities, used for racketeering purposes (FRB quasi-government or FRB commercial subsidiary banking investment corporations). Bozeman Financial LLC v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 955 F. 3D 971. The Federal Reserve Banks were established as chartered corporate instrumentalities (really a cartel of banking syndicates) of the United States under the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. See 12 U.S.C. § 221 et seq. Unlike the Postal Service, which was at issue in Return Mail, the Banks’s enabling statute, does not establish them as part of an executive agency, but rather each Bank is a “body corporate.” 12 U.S.C. §341. Like any other private corporation, the Banks each have a board of directors to enact bylaws and to govern the business of banking like corporations. But the FRB isn’t registered as a corporation within states, just merely as a cartel/organization/association-in-fact of banking syndicates. Moreover, the Bank may sue or be sued in “any federal court of law or equity.” The four elements of Rule 23(a) require a showing that: (1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable; (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class; (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; and (4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class. Plaintiffs may argue that the Supreme Court decision in Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co. (discussed in § 33 above) eases the requirements for certification of a RICO class. In Bridge, a RICO case that did not involve a class action, the Court held that a plaintiff asserting a RICO claim predicated on mail fraud, may be able to establish proximate cause without showing that the plaintiff relied on the alleged misrepresentations. However, the
circumstances of that case were unique because the plaintiff could show that it was directly
injured by fraud on which third-party government officials relied, as is the case in this matter committed by judges and cops (DHS & TPD). In this matter, government agents within local concerts, made up the frauds they commit themselves, with higher level government officials turning blind eyes. This government fraud requirement is met when judges within a circuit or district, commit honest services frauds using mail and/or wire misrepresentations, consequently their Imputed accessories after the fact (AATF) benefactors can be sued only in federal court (Title 12 U.S.C. §632) for non-compliance either in that state, or against the FRB headquarters directly (NY). The private FRB owners knowingly and intentionally use their banking corporations to transfer their private hot moneys to: This Court; Defendant Dawson’s State Farm Insurance Company as an FRB affiliate (see Appendix A); DHS; NCUA; TGH; SOF; and COT, as highly biased and illegal benefactor participants in this case, always involved in judicial court case scams, due to their contracted/paid/bribed judges under state governor orders to benefit them illegally at will, by approving conversion frauds and tortious interference scams on consumers within their courtrooms. Suing under the RICO Act, is NEVER a continuation of a prior lawsuit, but a new tort made possible by racketeering judges during prior court cases!
5. When the word bribed is stated in this complaint, it means: 1) Bribery under (Title 18, Chapter 96, Section 201); and 2) Extortion under (Section 1951); perpetrated to implement racketeering activities using hot moneys. And agent salaries and perks constitute as agreeable bribes, or forced extortions, depending on the amounts and force used in offering them, but both are used in making FRB agents comply in committing racketeering activities for their FRB benefactors, when these benefactors own and control the American money supply and most of the world’s businesses.
6. When Rothschild is used, it means Alex Rothschild and/or his Rothschild & Co.
***7. When syndicate is used, it means as stated as the word’s definition – – a group of individuals or organizations combined to promote some common interest, not a singular entity, like the FRB bank with its 12 branch offices!
8. When cartel is used, it means as stated as the word’s definition – – an association of manufacturers or suppliers with the purpose of maintaining prices at a high level and restricting competition, not a singular entity, like FRB bank with its 12 branch offices!
9. When the FRB owners and their FRB affiliated commercial subsidiary banking investment corporations, fund; invest; and collect agency proceeds, with some of the hot loot coming from consumers’ laundered and misappropriated moneys owed (blood moneys) using FRB contracted/paid judges to turn a blind eye to conversion frauds and tortious interference scams, a RICO relationship is most DEFINITELY in place between benefactor FRB owners/controllers and their beneficiary subordinate judicial agents. So the 4 doctrines of law cited repeatedly within this complaint DEFINITELY apply.
10. Jurisdiction:
This court has subject matter jurisdiction to hear all of the Counts against all of the Defendants in this complaint based on either 1) their residential locations being within local courthouse limits and 2) all of the injuries having occurred within the same limits, or by 3) the Defendants doing business locally within Tampa, Florida limits. Where the injuries occurred, is the correct jurisdiction for all the Defendants to be sued in state court. Or in federal court pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C. Code §1331, as this action arises under federal laws too, specifically but not limited to: 18 U.S.C. §1346 (honest services frauds); 18 U.S.C. §§1341; 1343; (mail and wire frauds); and `U.S.C. §§1513 (retaliation against witnesses); and under Title 28, Chapter 190, Section 5001.
11. The focus of specific personal jurisdiction is on the defendant’s/company’s conduct within the forum state, and the lawsuit must arise from that conduct. Consequently, the defrauding of the Plaintiff and his wife in this matter, arose from the advantageous money making relationship the FRB and the other Defendants continue to have with each other, by way of hot funds/investments/bribes originating from the FRB, being reallocated/recycled as seen on FRB’s, TAS and IPAC debit/credit ledger transfer sheets within its supercomputers, inter-governmental transfers made to either Governor DeSantis, or directly to State of Florida agencies, along with intra-governmental state government monetary transfers/distributions to local public/private Florida based agencies/agents like Centene and Defendant Couris (Appendix A & D). All the different addresses/structures housing FRB contracted/paid/bribed agents, public/private, make up the one (1) illegal FRB enterprise operating as both an enterprise when investing moneys to acquire and interest in, for the control of, continued racketeering activities in the future, and as an association-in-fact enterprise operating together through mergers and acquisitions within FRB banking syndicates, for wider FRB reaching racketeering purposes. The FRB owners operate from within both types of enterprises.
***12. Relevant Statements of Fact concerning statute of limitation to file claims in this matter:
13. A statute of limitations doesn’t accrue in Florida until the injury is known (Florida’s Date of Discovery Rule). The Plaintiff didn’t know Mr. Kimball’s death was from either a culpable or intentional tort, committed by David Dawson II and his passenger, until sometime months after the Plaintiff’s false imprisonment had ended in mid-December of 2023, with the partial murder video obtained by email from FHP around March of 2024. This video was reviewed about two (2) months later (mid-2024) by an attorney who told the Plaintiff about the F.S. 316,130(9) violation. And right after this, investigator “Star” was paid by the Plaintiff to live on the streets of Brandon, Florida, who obtained the consensus that Mrs. Kimball was setup to be murdered on 8-19-23 for supposedly stealing street drugs from the local addicts. But the Plaintiff still doesn’t really know what rolls the many participants played in Mrs. Kimball’s murder, when he was denied the rest of the FHP murder video and her TGH medical records!
14. 2 years after the CAUSE of the Wrongful Death and Survival Action claims are discovered under Applicable F.S. 95.11(5)(c) – – the limitation of actions within this subsection shall be limited to the health care provider and persons in privity with the provider of health care (Mrs. Kimball). In those actions covered by this paragraph in which it can be shown that fraud, concealment, or intentional misrepresentation of fact prevented the discovery of the injury the period of limitations is extended forward 2 years from the time that the injury is discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence, but in no event to exceed 7 years from the date the incident giving rise to the injury occurred. This intentional tort offers the Plaintiff a statute of limitations of up to 7 years, with an additional 2 years after Mrs. Kimball’s medical records are disclosed. If TGH spoliated Mrs. Kimball’s medical records, Defendant TGH has another 4 years to be sued under F.S. 95.11(3)(n) when it’s determined it did so.
15. A 4 year statute of limitation applies: F.S. 95.11(3)(i) – – due to a legal or Equitable Action founded on FRAUD, such as having filed a complaint for Equitable Relief in state court (25-CA-8096) by a state court judge, and having it illegally transferred to federal court by FRB contracted/paid Defendant Crist, Clerk of the Court and Comptroller of the 13th Judicial Circuit, for the purpose of being illegally dismissed by federal court judge Thomas Barber the next day (case 25-CV-3077), when a notice of the Plaintiff dismissing the FRB from the state case (25-CA-8096) was given to Judge Barber before he illegally dismissing case 25-CV-3077. And four (4) of the defendants were already being sued in this same courthouse for federal violations under case 25-CV-2181, so Judge Barber had NO jurisdiction to do anything! His false order is VOID! This is an intentional tort with a 4 year statute of limitations, which applies to Defendant Crist as contracted/paid individual, working for the FRB in defrauding the Plaintiff in 11/2025.
16. 4 year statute of limitations: F.S. 95.11(3)(n) – – due to an action for assault, battery, false arrest, malicious prosecution, malicious interference, false imprisonment, or any other intentional tort, Defendants Dawson (individual); COT; SOF; TPD; Rothschild (individual); and Crist (individual) are being sued in this matter. The Plaintiff was Falsely Imprisoned until 12-13-23, consequently he had no knowledge of Mrs. Kimball’s murder until after he was released from jail. Under F.S. 95.11(3)(n), the four (4) year statute of limitations starts after 12-13-23.
17. Whoever, through culpable negligence, exposes another person to personal injury commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. Whoever, through culpable negligence, inflicts actual personal injury on another commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. And the statute of limitations starts to accrue, when the injury is discovered.
18. Complaint:
19. Statements of Fact in Mrs. Gloria Schneider’s 7-1-12 murder by her caregiver, which relevantly started the Plaintiff feud with John Rockefeller who’s the proximate cause of this complaint:
20. For at least 10 years prior to Gloria Schneider’s murder in 2012, her money was being laundered into Richard Murphy’s FRB pension fund by Richard, his wife Sybil and her sister Cyrie Schneider, Mrs. Schneider’s caregiver.
21. The Plaintiff married Mrs. Kimball in 2010, with her drug use making her an easy TPD agent cop target in public, for civil right violations. This forced the Plaintiff to protect his wife’s constitutional rights being violated as TPD sport, with FRB profits pouring in from her illegal court case fines; fees; and jail sentences, from the Plaintiff’s wallet!
22. Early in 2012, the Plaintiff made himself Mrs. Kimball’s guardian advocate for the purpose of giving her moral support and to stop the fleecing of his wife by FRB contracted/paid agent judges and cops, by having the right to stand up for her rights in criminal court, but Mrs. Kimball’s right to consent ALWAYS remained with her under during this advocacy program.
23. A few days later, the Plaintiff argued with HCSO Colonel James Previtera about his wife being given the wrong medications while in jail. James retaliated by sending his deputies to the Plaintiff’s house immediately to harass and intimidate him for days with their guns drawn.
24. The Plaintiff made complaints about James Previtera’s retaliatory actions above to both TPD and FDLE, which resulted in James being asked to leave HCSO (fired).
25. Right after this, Sheriff David Gee had the Plaintiff’s guardian advocacy illegally cancelled by Judge Isom, with everyone in the courtroom, other than the Plaintiff, stating Mrs. Kimball supposedly didn’t need a guardian against the FRB’s agent judges and cops.
26. After 7-1-12, the Plaintiff’s contested the false will drafted for his mother by probate attorney Robert Welker without her knowledge. Every probate attorney in town, even Robert Welker, stated Mrs. Schneider wasn’t alive long enough for her signed will to be valid when she died, no was murdered, 2 days after she signed a will solely acquired by her caregiver. Mrs. Schneider was never taken to a doctor the last year of her life; denied her antibiotics for pneumonia; lied to about what she had medically wrong with her; and left for dead after signing the false will.
27. Relevant Statements of Fact after Mrs. Schneider’s murder:
28. From 2012 to 2019, the Plaintiff fought with trial and appellate judges to 1) have his mother’s culpable or intentional murder investigated, and to 2) reverse the conversion and interference scams committed on his mother by respectively the Murphys and their attorneys, but to no avail.
29. Case 20-CV-78 was filed, NOT as a rendition of the local court case fights with the Murphys for committing conversion frauds and implementing tortious interference scams through their attorneys, but as a bona fide RICO Act complaint, due to the judges and opposing counsels having combined forces to commit honest services frauds on the Plaintiff, financially saving their benefactor John Rockefeller and his FRB, by keeping Gloria Schneider’s stolen loot in Richard Murphy’s pension funds, held by FRB commercial subsidiary banking syndicates for McDonald Douglas and Lockheed Martin.
30. In early to mid-2020, John Rockefeller was phoned by the Plaintiff numerous times to resolve the matter. What was stated is cited in the Rockefeller letters (Appendix A).
31. Throughout 2021, the Plaintiff’s wife had a total of $1,600 of her SSI money converted into the pockets of her neighbors, by their having drugged her, with Mayor Jane Castor from COT and Stephanie Banks (ironic last name) from social security contacted.
32. In late 2021, Agent Mark Braswell from DHS, was not acting in accordance with DHS’s standard Blue Campaign management plans; policies; and operational procedures (mandates and policies), so the Plaintiff is currently suing DHS in federal court for its illegal involvement in also causing his injuries: 1) The Plaintiff’s email service provider, mail.com, called him on his phone, stating that someone at the DHS office in Orlando, Florida was trying really hard for days to log into his email account. 2) A month later, this same agent was pounding on the Plaintiff’s front door with a letter addressed to him, which demanded the Plaintiff to stop calling the local social security manager, Stephanie Banks, about reimbursing his wife for her stolen SSI moneys (Appendix B). This was a ruse because the Plaintiff had stopped contacting Ms. Banks two (2) months prior. 3) While at the Plaintiff’s home, this agent started knocking on neighbors’ doors to obtain any gossip about Mrs. Kimball. 4) A couple weeks later, DCF was pounding at Mrs. Kimball’s door to investigate a complaint this same agent had made to them about the Plaintiff supposedly having STRUCK his wife, not about human trafficking (see the DCF reports in Appendix B). The Plaintiff was asked by DCF why a false complaint was made by a DHS agent, but he couldn’t answer the question. 5) A week later, this same agent started leaving voicemail and text messages on the Plaintiff’s phone, not about Mrs. Kimball, but about his FRB scammed inheritance, due to John Rockefeller’s joint venture pension funds through Lockheed Martin and McDonald Douglas (see Appendix E video). 6) A month later, a confidential law enforcement friend of the Plaintiff, advised him that a DHS agent was talking to TPD’s chief of police, Brian Dugan, about DHS wanting the Plaintiff illegally arrested and charged with human trafficking of his wife. 7) A month after filing a Writ of Mandamus on Ronald DeSantis in 2025 (Appendix A), with the video of agent Braswell included, the Plaintiff received a voice mail message from Agent Braswell screaming his first name, and then disconnecting the call. See Appendix B.
33. No probable cause was made to search or arrest the Plaintiff on 2-24-22, based on material evidence in violation of any Florida statute, or a conversation with competent Mrs. Kimball beforehand, just an Amazon purchased port-a-potty with liners was used as a ploy to illegally obtain a search warrant and arrest the Plaintiff on, which TPD subordinate agent cops called a bucket, and a good bust (Appendix B).
34. At the local Tampa Bay courthouse on the morning of 2-23-22, a bogus search warrant was obtained by local FRB contracted/paid/bribed TPD cops before any conversation with competent Mrs. Kimball, using no material evidence of a crime committed (bona fide material evidence to a crime committed, is MISSING from case file 22-CF-2324-A).
35. At the local courthouse in the afternoon of 2-23-22, Mrs. Kimball was FRB agent cop (TPD) browbeaten on courthouse audio/video, in a secured backroom, in front of her attorney, Marc Joseph, during case 21-CF-006147-A, while the conversation was also TPD agent cop recorded (bona fide material evidence).
36. Mrs. Kimball was against her will, made to speak with TPD agent cops, or be arrested and charged with a made up crime, while one of them dangled handcuffs in her face (bona fide material evidence on audio/video).
37. Mrs. Kimball made NO incriminating statements against the Plaintiff, the topic of the conversation, so then an FRB contracted/paid/bribed agent prosecutor working for Andrew Warren, offered her attorney a commonly used FRB BRIBE to nolle process her felony charge, if she’d allow FRB agent cops to take her to another location. This was done to 1) desperately obtain any evidence for legally arresting the Plaintiff on the next day and 2) to keep Mrs. Kimball from going home, so cops would have an easier time illegally arresting her husband (bona fide material evidence in case files 22-CF-2324-A & 21-CF-006147-A).
38. In the evening of 2-23-22, Mrs. Kimball was unknowingly taken to TPD agent, Corporal Crystal Shiver’s HOME, and pressured for, what the Plaintiff was told by his wife was overnight, to talk about her husband with further rewards promised. Then she was taken to a federal FRB funded half-way house, told she couldn’t go home, and periodically browbeaten for 3 weeks while being audio recorded (bona fide material evidence MISSING from case files 22-CF-2324-A & 21-CF-006147-A). See Appendix B.
39. On 2-24-22, TPD agents showed up at Mrs. Kimball’s residence with a bogus search warrant for the property, obtained without any material evidence provided to local Judge Twine of a crime committed. This warrant basically stated FRB agent cops had the right to look for evidence of abuse and neglect committed by a caregiver under Florida Chapter 825, as though Mrs. Kimball was disabled under Florida Chapter 825, when she wasn’t! When cops were finished searching, all they found were stools in the family port-a-potty, with the Plaintiff being illegally charged with neglect as though a port-a-potty was illegal and he was a caregiver under Florida Chapter 825, who supposedly forced his wife to use their port-a-potty, along with theft/exploitation, also under Florida Chapter 825, as though Mrs. Kimball didn’t have the capacity for consenting to her husband protecting her properties (ID & food stamp cards found in his wallet). So Mrs. Kimball was supposedly incompetent, because a wife would supposedly never let her husband pick up groceries at the store for her! The Plaintiff married Sandra Kimball before she started receiving SSI benefits and always tried to keep her from spending her money or trading her belongings, like her food stamp card and ID, for street drugs. If the Plaintiff hadn’t done this, and knowing his constitutional rights aren’t worth a damn in America, complements of the FRB owners, he would’ve probably been charged with aiding and abetting in his wife’s drug use and murder! DEVILS! Mrs. Kimball was NEVER disabled under Florida Chapter 825, because she had NO permanent mental or physical disability classifying her as either mentally incompetent or physically impaired! According to social security, Mrs. Kimball suffered from manic depressive bipolar disorder, due to years of street drug use, which left her with a non-permanent nervous condition that social security tested for every 2 years to confirm she still couldn’t work because of it, but was competent when on her medications, not street drugs (bona fide material evidence in Appendix C).
40. Mrs. Kimball was her own representative payee (RP) for her SSI benefits, which were deposited into her own bank account! And the Plaintiff was never anyone’s caregiver! Mrs. Kimball never had a caregiver due to never needing one! This is evident when NO material evidence of: 1) The Plaintiff ever being a caregiver; 2) the Plaintiff ever stealing Mrs. Kimball’s benefits, or abusing her physically or mentally; nor 3) Mrs. Kimball being incompetent, was ever produced by SOF/COT/TPD agents in case 22-CF-2324-A! No judge in 25 years of Mrs. Kimball being arrested for drug use, ever brought up competency issues! Mental evaluations were only ordered by judges on Mrs. Kimball, after her attorney intelligently brought up the subject to fool prosecutors and the legal system into dismissing her MISDEMEANOR charges a half dozen times before 2021 (bona fide material evidence held by Attorney Alex Stavrou), due to Mrs. Kimball really being temporality blitzed half the time on street drugs. Mrs. Kimball suffered from severe momentary depression, and needed either medications or street drugs to stop her from having these reoccurring episodes. Unfortunately her medications weren’t sufficient all of the time.
41. Mrs. Kimball was NOT incompetent when she needed to pass competency evaluations, and did so during three (3) of them (bona fide material evidence in case 21-CF-006147-A) (Appendix C), with Attorney Marc Joseph as a witness! The Plaintiff can honestly testify to his wife showing more basic knowledge, logic and good sense, when off street drugs and on her medications, than he ever did!
42. All of the incriminating statements made, not only in the arrest affidavit, but throughout case 22-CF-2324-A, are COT/TPD/SOF agent made up, originating possibly from the Plaintiff’s neighbors residing kitty-corner from him at 10407 N 25 Street, Tampa, FL 33612, retaliating against him due to his phone calls to FRB agent cops, made about their illegal activities. Consequently, FRB agent cops intentionally lied to Judge Twine about the validity of their oral/written statements, when they had NO material evidence to support this judge granting them a search warrant on the Plaintiff’s house. The bogus search warrant was needed, so cops would be able to search for anything illegal they could find to legally charge the Plaintiff with, AFTER illegally arresting him! (desired FRB/DHS/COT/TPD agent cop goal with hindsight being 20/20).
43. The false imprisonment of the Plaintiff and the murder of Mrs. Kimball:
44. The Plaintiff and his wife were represented by Attorney Matthew Kimball McDowell during case 22-CF-2324-A, who told the Plaintiff that his wife COULD live at home, as it was a gray area of law which allowed both him and his wife to live at the same property, due to the no contact order only being on the Plaintiff, with the property solely owned by him. So the Plaintiff technically didn’t have to leave when his wife was home.
45. In mid-2023, the prosecution found out about Mrs. Kimball’s living arrangement and illegally arrested the Plaintiff 2 more times for his wife’s presence at her house, with Judge Goudie NOT granting the Plaintiff bail, and with Fox News at 5 airing false information about the Plaintiff on TV, so he was forced to plead out, or be injured by inmates. The second time TPD found the Plaintiff’s wife at her house, the Plaintiff was jailed for 4.5 months using a bogus TPD search warrant with planted items used to arrest with his wife murdered on the streets!
46. How the 4 doctrines of law cited throughout this complaint are applicable in this matter:
47. Imputation and subsequently acquiescing in, by not implementing the appropriate corrective measures after having knowingly benefited by a fraud, keeps all wrong doers on the hook for both PRIOR and FUTURE damages!
48. The Law of Agency establishes a set of rules for determining when, in relation to third parties, an agent’s conduct or knowledge should be imputed to his or her principal. See Restatement (Third) of Agency §§2.01 – 2.04, 5.03 (2006). For example, in transactions with third parties, an agent’s conduct will be imputed to the principal, if the agent acted with actual or apparent authority (attorney/client relationship), or if the principal ratified the agent’s conduct. See Fergus v. Ross, 477 Mass. 563, 566-568, 79 N. E. 3d 421 (2017). See also Restatement (Third) of Agency, supra at §§2.01 – 2.03, 4.02.
49. In the realm of torts, the tortious conduct committed by an agent in the scope of his or her agency, will be imputed to the principal under a theory of Respondeat Superior. See Lev v. Beverly Enters.-Mass., Inc., 457 Mass. 234, 238, 929 N.E. 2d 303 (2010). See also Restatement (Third) of Agency, supra at § 2.04. Knowledge that an agent acquires in the scope of his or her employment can also be imputed to the principal. See Sunrise Props., Inc. v. Bacon, Wilson, Ratner, Cohen, Salvage, Fialky & Fitzgerald, P.C., 425 Mass. 63, 66-67, 679 N.E. 2d 540 (1997). See also Restatement (Third) of Agency, supra at § 5.03. Merrimack Coll. v. KPMG LLP, 480 Mass. 614, 108 N. E. 3d 430, 438 (2018).
50. The result of imputation is that the principal bears the legal consequences of the agent’s conduct. Thus, if an agent with actual or apparent authority enters into a contract with a third party, the principal will be bound by that contract. See, e.g., Linkage Corp. v. Trustees of Boston Univ., 425 Mass. 1, 4, 17, 679 N. E. 2d 191, cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1015, 118 S. Ct. 599, 139 L. Ed. 2d 488 (1997) (university bound by agreement signed by vice-president where vice-president had apparent authority).
51. If an agent negligently injures a third party while acting within the scope of the agency, the principal will be held vicariously liable for that negligence. See, e.g., Dias v. Brigham Med. Assocs., Inc., 438 Mass. 317, 323, 780 N. E. 2d 447 (2002) (corporation could be held vicariously liable for alleged medical malpractice of its physician-employee). Merrimack Coll. v. KPMG LLP, 480 Mass. 614, 108 N. E. 3d 430, 438 (2018). Imputation serves various functions. It creates incentives for principals to choose their agents wisely. See Restatement (Third) of Agency, supra at § 5.03 comment b, at 360. It also encourages principals to supervise their agents and to share information with them. Id. The ultimate purpose behind these rules of imputation, however, is to fairly allocate risks between principals and innocent third parties. As explained in Kansallis Fin. Ltd. v. Fern, 421 Mass. 659, 664-665, 659 N. E. 2d 731 (1996).
52. Kansallis:
“Standing behind [the] diverse concepts of vicarious liability is a principle that helps to rationalize them. This is the principle that as between two innocent parties — the principal-master and the third party — the principal-master who for his own purposes, places another in a position to do harm to a third party, should bear the loss. A principal who requires an agent to transact his business, and can only get that business done, if third parties deal with the agent as if with the principal, cannot complain if the innocent third party suffers loss by reason of the agent’s act. Similarly, the master who must put an instrument into his servant’s hands in order to get his business done … must also bear the loss, if the servant causes harm to a stranger in the use of that instrument as the business is transacted.” (Citations omitted.) Merrimack Coll. v. KPMG LLP, 480 Mass. 614, 108 N. E. 3d 430, 438 (2018).
53. Vicarious Liability under the Respondeat Superior Doctrine: “Qui Facit per alium facit per se”, i.e., he who acts through others, acts through himself. And “respondeat superior”, i.e., let the master be liable. A master (owner/controller) is primarily liable for the actions of his or her hired servants.
54. Statements of Fact against Defendant Dawson II:
55. While the Plaintiff was in jail until 12/2023, Defendant Dawson, who was driving his car at 3:40am on 8-19-23, purposely overtook a parked car next to a visible crosswalk within an intersection with a traffic light, without slowing down and struck Mrs. Kimball, a pedestrian within a visible crosswalk, a violation of F.S. 316.130(9), and never got out of his car to see what he could do to help, nor did he call in the emergency to 911, a violation of his duty to render aid under F.S. 316.062. Thus a culpable or intentional tort was committed by David Dawson by striking Mrs. Kimball illegally with his car.
56. FHP still refuses to provide the full video of the homicide to the victim’s spouse, without having done a mandatory drug screening of Defendant Dawson at the time of the homicide (see report in Appendix A). It’s still undetermined if Dawson was culpably or intentionally negligent when he struck Mrs. Kimball with his car hard without slowing down, as if he was trying to murder her.
57. Defendant Dawson clearly overtook a vehicle parked at a stop light, in front of a crosswalk, a violation of F.S. 316.130(9) – – Whenever any vehicle is stopped at a marked crosswalk, or at any unmarked crosswalk at an intersection, to permit a pedestrian to cross the roadway, the driver of any other vehicle approaching from the rear, shall not overtake and pass such stopped vehicle! This reads exactly on par with what the video footage of Mrs. Kimball’s homicide shows! This intentional, or culpable, negligence on the part of Defendant Dawson, resulted in at least the aggravated manslaughter (statutorily cited later on in the Counts section) of Mrs. Kimball (capable negligence is aggravated manslaughter, which is a type of murder)! At this point it’s speculative as to what Defendant Dawson was doing at 3:40pm on a Saturday morning, driving at a high speed. This speculation became highly alarming to the Plaintiff, when FHP failed to conduct MANY of its mandatory statutory duties right after the homicide as State of Florida mandated policies. Part of the homicide can be watched from a partial clip in Appendix E.
58. The Plaintiff hired credible investigator “Star” to determine, if Defendant Dawson was negligent, or deliberate, when he CRIPPLED Mrs. Kimball with his car (see homicide report Appendix A). According to A) hearsay witness testimony, along with B) FHP having intentionally violated both the Plaintiff and his wife’s state and federal 14th amendment rights; and state and federal mandatory statutory duty to properly investigate a homicide, by doing a drug screening and review of the full video obtained for criminal/racketeering activities, with the spouse NOT being given a copy of everything FHP obtained; and to MAINTAIN its standard management plans; policies; and operational procedures during both the homicide and in case 24-CA-7358, but intentionally failed to: 1) Apply required F.S. 316.103(9) to its homicide report; 2) do a mandatory drug screening of Defendant Dawson at the scene of the homicide (very suspicious FHP violation of homicide procedures (pre-spoliation of evidence)); 3) correct its false homicide report which wrongly states Mrs. Kimball was at fault while in the crosswalk (Appendix B), thus WRONGLY stating she caused the accident (very suspicious when pedestrians have the right of way, and under F.S. 316.130(9); 4) concealed/spoliated the rest of the murder video, part of which was inadvertently provided to the Plaintiff (hindsight 20/20), so A) no one else could determine who jump out of Defendant Dawson’s car right after the homicide and ran off (as stated by witness Brandon Santiago cited in the FHP’s homicide report); or B) who was chasing/luring Mrs. Kimball into the crosswalk (very suspicious); and C) who had been stalking Mrs. Kimball for hours the morning of 8-19-23; and 5) intentionally having its attorney in case 24-CA-7358, blatantly state FHP spoliated the homicide video to conceal the rest of it, when it’s MANDATORY for FHP to keep complete video tapes on all homicides, as stated to the Plaintiff in mid-2025, by Tampa based Lt. Eric French, FHP (extremely suspicious)! The manager of the Take 5 oil change shop which made the video, stated to the Plaintiff that an FHP officer had downloaded a full days’ worth of the video!
59. These facts along with credible testimony from a couple of shop owners and a dozen homeless witnesses working/living in the immediate vicinity of Mrs. Kimball’s homicide (not material evidence, but a good start for obtaining more), all stated to both the Plaintiff and his investigator, they either had personal knowledge of who murdered Mrs. Kimball and why it was committed, but were too scared to give the details, or heard credible hearsay information that the car driver (Defendant Dawson) who caused the homicide (3:40am on 8-19-23), was a drug dealer/runner working out of another location in west Brandon, Florida for covertness, who had a known drug pusher/distributor in his car at the time, who were both looking to injure Mrs. Kimball (first or second degree murder) for supposedly stealing drugs from the pusher, as well as from his local buyers/users for months. Credible witnesses recently told the Plaintiff they tried to keep Mrs. Kimball hidden the night she was murdered, so she couldn’t be found by Defendant Dawson and his passenger! At this point, Defendant Dawson should’ve already had his driving privileges suspended for illegally mowing Mrs. Kimball down with his car, a violating F.S. 316.103(9)!
60. Since a murder occurred, and FHP’s a department within the State of Florida (SOF), there’s no statute of limitations in suing SOF, or one of its employees, for intentionally covering up the murder video by spoliation, for the FULL recoverable damage amounts in this case, through its benefactor the FRB, with the deepest pockets, currently being sued in state court!
61. Relevant Statements of Fact against Tampa General Hospital for spoliation of evidence and Fraud on the Court committed:
62. TGH, along with its owner John Couris, knowingly and intentionally denied Mrs. Kimball’s spouse her TGH medical records, when a personal representative has never been appointed in this matter, a violation of F.S. 395.3025(1). John Couris was directly notified in early 2025, that Mrs. Kimball’s spouse, a reasonably prudent person, believed she had been murdered by his funding source, the FRB, due to the Plaintiff threatening to sue the FRB through John Rockefeller. A letter directly sent to John Rockefeller in 2020, with a copy of the 2025 Rockefeller letter, both in Appendix A, was sent to Mr. Couris, who’s now at least an accessory after the fact (AATF) in either the culpable, or intentional, murder of Mrs. Kimball by Defendant Dawson, but it’s still unknown if John Couris didn’t in fact intentionally cause Mrs. Kimball’s death as a benefit to his FRB funding source through TGH, thus also assisting in the murder of Mrs. Kimball, with her TGH medical records possibly spoliated as stated in case 24-CA-7358, as a misrepresentation used to cover-up TGH’s involvement in Mrs. Kimball’s murder.
63. TGH is an AATF in at least the aggravated manslaughter of Mrs. Kimball, by covering up her medical details to benefit itself; its funding and investing source the FRB; and Dawson. John Couris screwed up when he failed to provide Mrs. Kimball’s medical records, after he was directly notified of her being murdered, at least as an F.S. 782.07(1) violation. Now TGH is being correctly sued for Mrs. Kimball’s medical records being technically spoliated (concealed or destroyed). And the statute of limitation on wrongful death demands that TGH continue to be sued for wrongful death to preserve the filing date, because it fraudulently spoliated Mrs. Kimball’s medical records!
64. The Plaintiff is suing TGH due to John Couris’ many law violations: 1) He covered up the details of Mrs. Kimball’s murder, by tortiously interfering in the Plaintiff obtaining Mrs. Kimball’s medical records directly from TGH, starting in the beginning of 2024 (Appendix A); and by having 2) hired attorneys to misrepresent the facts in court as an accessory after the fact in Mrs. Kimball’s murder during court case 24-CA-7358, when he knew beforehand Mrs. Kimball was probably murdered (no court ruling of murder needs to be made on this subject to civilly sue for murder.
65. John Couris is being sued through TGH for knowingly and intentionally stopping TGH from providing the Plaintiff with his wife’s medical records, a violation of F.S. 395.3025(1) (Appendix A). John Couris had his attorneys brazenly lie in court case 24-CA-7358, stating that the Plaintiff couldn’t have Mrs. Kimball’s TGH medical records, because he wasn’t married to her in 2010, for their marriage license not being on file with Hillsborough County’s, Clerk of the Court, until after her death! A total bull chip lie! What’s John Couris been hiding for 2 years?
66. John Couris also tortiously interfered with the Plaintiff’s expectancy to obtain his murdered wife’s medical records in a timely fashion from TGH, starting in the beginning of 2024, now considered spoliated evidence (mandatory court sanction required, if he doesn’t produce the records after this case is officially open)! And John Couris will be in violation of U.S. Code § 1519 (destruction, alteration, or falsification of records), if he no longer has them!
67. It’s probable that John Couris through TGH committed culpable or intentional wrongful death on Mrs. Kimball using his TGH agents, a violation of both Florida Statutes 768.16 (wrongful death); and 46.021 (survival action claim for 3.5 days of suffering), because of the spoliation/concealment of Mrs. Kimball’s TGH medical records as an AATF in her murder. If this is later found to be incorrect, the Plaintiff will amend his complaint and delete these Counts, but you cannot add them to this complaint after 2 years, so these Counts have to stay with TGH until after discovery. John Couris’ fault for not providing the records.
68. John Couris committed a compounding offense after tortiously interfering in the Plaintiff obtaining his wife’s medical records, which also makes him at least an AATF to whoever was the proximate cause of her death. It consists of three (3) basic elements: (1) knowledge of the crime (direct notice was given to both Governor DeSantis and John Couris, cited in Appendix A); (2) the agreement not to prosecute or inform (Mrs. Kimball’s medical records were withheld or destroyed (spoliated)) by the illegal participation/involvement of both DeSantis and Couris, respectively cases 25-CV-564 & 24-CA-7358); and (3) the receipt of consideration – – continued state funding to TGH from the FRB through DeSantis; Medicaid; and USF, for the purpose of continuing to have TGH SAVE the FRB from indirectly having to pay the Plaintiff, and possibly other consumers, restitution/compensation through TGH. The offense is concluded when there’s an agreement to either withhold evidence of the crime, conceal it, or fail to prosecute it. “English common law states: The “crime of compounding” is committed when a perpetrator, prosecutor, any other official or another person enters into an agreement with the victim of a crime or an official, whereby some, or other benefits, are transferred between the parties in order to stop, withdraw or alter the reporting or prosecution of an offense,” explains Charles De Meillon, Florida Chapter 843, Obstructing Justice 843.14 – – Compounding Felony. The Plaintiff had one Defendant complain because he cited criminal statutes in his state complaint. The Plaintiff can’t sue under any criminal statute. But he can show all of the RELEVANT law violations which resulted in his personal injuries. If the Plaintiff can have his mug shot all over the Internet because of John Rockefeller, he can accurately state what real criminal violations his agents committed during this matter!
69. John Couris is also being sued under Title 18, Chapter 96, Sections 1961(1)A & B; specifically Section 1341 (paper by mail used in knowingly and intentionally giving out misinformation of the facts in court case 24-CA-7358, about the Plaintiff not being married to Mrs. Kimball); Section 1343 (wire by Internet used in knowingly and intentionally giving out misinformation of the facts in court case 24-CA-7358 about the Plaintiff not being married to Mrs. Kimball), resulting in Fla. Stat. §838.022(a);(b);&(c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; under F.S. 895, violations – – TGH committed honest services fraud, by not providing Mrs. Kimball’s medical records to the Plaintiff, as well as being an accomplice to the FRB’s contracted/paid/bribed judge in case 24-CA-7358 doing the same.
70. John Couris is guilty of letting either a culpable or intentional tort committed at his hospital stand, after the Plaintiff directly notified him of Mrs. Kimball’s being murdered! This makes John Couris either an AATF, or before the fact (ABTF) as an accomplice in the murder of Mrs. Kimball, DURING HER STAY AT TGH, depending on what’s in her TGH medical records the Plaintiff still doesn’t have! By 2) John Couris continuing to aid and abet the FRB (a source of funding for TGH, by tortiously interfering with the Plaintiff obtaining his wife’s medical records, after being directly imputed by the Plaintiff to stop doing so when she was murdered (Appendix A), John Couris is now at least an AATF to whoever was the proximate cause of her death! Since hindsight’s 20/20, John Couris’ actions/inactions (omissions) after being imputed with the facts in this matter early this year (his letter contained a copy of the 2025 Rockefeller letter referenced in Appendix A), he’s aided and abetted in the cover-up of Mrs. Kimball’s murder as an AATF, either on the street, or at his hospital! The million dollar question is did Defendant Couris aid and abet FRB agents in purposely ending Mrs. Kimball’s life? Due to the spoliation of evidence under Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.380(b)(2), makes both Couris and TGH, at least accessories after the fact in her aggravated manslaughter committed by the rest of the Defendants and their concert members. You lose the evidence, you pay for the crime as if you committed it!
71. John Couris’ actions/inactions (omissions) during case 24-CA-7358, continue to injure the Plaintiff and maximize FRB funds officially remaining with TGH, an FRB funded and invested in corporation (Appendix A), in a two (2) step, multitier judicially implemented, tortious interference scam (case 24-CA-7358) to misappropriate Mrs. Kimball’s medical records owed to the Plaintiff – – medical records illegally allowed by FRB contracted/paid/bribed judges in cases 24-CA-7358 and 25-CA-564, to ultimately be hospital kept/spoliated, which profits the FRB in NOT having to compensate/reimburse its TGH business affiliate for any medical malpractice or hospital regulation violation committed, but also by the rest of the FRB funded/invested in Defendants who technically murdered her too, not having to pay restitution, amounting to a huge amount of FRB SAVINGS.
72. Both Defendant Couris and his hospital, which technically spoliated (concealed/destroyed) Mrs. Kimball’s medical records, are liable for her wrongful death, because of: 1) The spoliation committed, and 2) the competent hearsay testimony from a unbiased TGH emergency room nurse, who imparted to the Plaintiff, both TGH and its owner, John Couris, were vicarious liable in NOT adhering to professional hospital standards! These standards amounted to having a board certified neurosurgeon available in the morning hours of 8-19-23, or getting one in FAST! You don’t let a person going unconscious with a head injury go untreated for long, or his or her head will swell up with fluid, and their brain DIES! These standards are violated when a hospital intern such as a residing USF doctor, completing his or her residency at TGH, wrongly/illegally acts as a board certified neurosurgeon. Consequently, TGH and/or its owners can be held accountable for not having one available to perform a needed surgery quickly and correctly after admitting a patient! This liability applies to issues of inadequate staffing, or insufficient training, for handling an emergency, like when the one (1) main TGH board certified neurosurgeon is needed, but has the weekend OFF and some other staff member makes a BAD decision! It’s the Plaintiff choice to either sue TGH or the owner, and there’s no doubt whatsoever Defendant Couris is intentionally/culpably negligent when he needs to racketeer with the FRB’s controller in Florida (Governor DeSantis), for FRB savings/retaliation purposes (Appendix A)! Hindsight in this matter is 20/20!
73. So according to competent hearsay testimony from TGH, by it not having performed Mrs. Kimball’s lifesaving procedure in time, or at least pulled in a board certified neurosurgeon quickly, or had its helicopter team transport her to another hospital with a competent board certified neurosurgeon waiting on hand to immediately perform the procedure, one who finished his or her neurosurgeon residency, Mrs. Kimball’s NOW DEAD! Consequently, if what the nurse above stated is true, Defendant Couris is at least vicariously, no intentionally, liable for Mrs. Kimball’s wrongful death, due to really being an AATF, AFTER having been imputed by the Plaintiff of his wife having been murdered, but still isn’t the proximate cause of damages, the FRB is! To find out how John Couris and his hospital were involved in Mrs. Kimball’s murder, all of her TGH medical records need to be reviewed!
74. Relevant Statements of Fact against City of Tampa (COT):
75. COT agent cops (TPD), obtained a false search warrant of Mrs. Kimball’s house in the morning of 2-23-22, without providing any physical evidence of a violation of Florida statute, as indicated from the warrant used to search (see Appendix B). TPD interrogated Mrs. Kimball in the afternoon of 2-23-22 in front of her attorney Marc Joseph, and threatened her when she stated that she didn’t want to talk to them, with ultimately COT/TPD having to offer her a bribe to dismiss her felony case with an 18 month sentence in prison, if she allowed them to take her to an unknown place, thus illegally keeping her from going home as planned for 1.5 years (2-23-22 to 8-21-23), while further interrogating her for 3 weeks without any crime having been committed, as evident from referencing cases 22-CF-2324-A and 21-CF-006147-A. DHS’s involvement in this matter was to involve COT; and SOF as concert members, for FRB retaliatory purposes. Without obtaining any information from Mrs. Kimball of a crime committed by her husband the Plaintiff, TPD illegally searched her house on 2-24-22, committed theft; conversion; and destruction of her and her husband’s properties (case 22-CF-2324-A photos show a trashed house, not from the Plaintiff or his wife, but from COT/TPD agent cops).
76. The results of this search yielded no sign of Mrs. Kimball being abused or neglected by anyone, as confirmed by one of the TPD agent cops who executed the bogus search warrant, later deposed by Attorney McDowell, recorded on film, and viewable in Appendix E! On 2-24-22, TPD agent cops wrongly arrested and charged the Plaintiff with both neglect and theft under Florida Chapter 825, which entails crimes against adults having either a permanent mental or physical disabilities of the magnitude to be easily exploited. Mrs. Kimball being blitzed on street drugs most of the time, doesn’t count. So she wasn’t disabled under this statute!
77. Because TPD found stools in the family’s legally owned and operated port-a-potty, it wrongly claimed that, by Mrs. Kimball using a port-a-potty made for human waste (see a photo of in Appendix D), not a flushing toilet, the Plaintiff had somehow abused his wife under Chapter 825. COT; and Jane Castor; through TPD agent cops; were instrumental in initially railroading the Plaintiff onto SOF, so Jane Castor’s entire local concert could keep the Plaintiff’s wife from going home, due to the type of bogus charges TPD agent cops filed on him. And due to the illegal arrangement DHS had with COT/TPD/SOF, all accomplices in Jane Castor’s local concert, with all of these agencies/agents knowing no crime was committed by the Plaintiff in case 22-CF-2324-A.
78. COT/TPD agent cops starting on 2-23-22, Mrs. Kimball was shown the streets by them, with nowhere to go and where Attorney Matthew Kimball McDowell found her 3 month later in Pinellas County Florida, living and sleeping on CONCRETE without her medications! If Mrs. Kimball was really COT/TPD’s witness they were trying to protect, where was the evidence given to them by Mrs. Kimball before or after the Plaintiff’s arrest to prove a crime was committed by him? It certainly wasn’t placed into case 22-CF-2324-A. If after Mrs. Kimball having given SOF through COT/TPD, NO testimony it could use to prosecute the Plaintiff with (no affidavit signed, or audio/video filed in case 22-CF-2324-A, incriminating the Plaintiff in any Florida statute violation), and both SOF; and COT/TPD knew Mrs. Kimball was disabled and in need of her medications, which her attorney Matthew Kimball McDowell provided to her on the streets only once, multiple state and city agents, like Jane Castor; Andrew Warren; Susan Lopez; Lynn Goudie; and Mellissa Grajales, are at least culpably negligent in her aggravated manslaughter (MURDER), by intentionally violating the survival action statute (F.S. 46.021), to intentionally keep her on the streets with the false no contact order on her husband still in place! This was done to both aggravate the Plaintiff and to keep arresting him every time COT/TPD found his wife at home.
79. I n this case, all state entities (municipalities and employees) are being sued in state court for any one of their employees having committed a negligent or intentionally tort, while acting within the scope of his or her employment which 1) breached a state government policy. And they’re also being sued in federal court for having 2) implemented a state government policy in violation of their duty to the public under the U.S. Constitution. The plaintiff is suing COT in federal court under, but not limited to the following: 1) Title 28, Chapter 190, Section 5001; 2) (Title 18, Chapter 13, U.S. Codes § 241); 3) Title 42, Chapter 21, Section 1983; and 4) Title 18, Chapter 13, U.S. Code § 241. Punitive damages and attorney’s fees are owed for common law frauds and breaches of fiduciary duties to the public by municipalities. “A public official, acts as trustee for the citizens and the State … and thus owes the normal fiduciary duties of a trustee, e.g., honesty and loyalty to them.” United States v. Kincaid-Chauncey, 556 F. 3d 923, 939 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting United States v. Silvano, 812 F. 2d 754, 759 (1st Cir. 1987) and United States v. Mandel, 591 F. 2d 1347, 1363 (4th Cir. 1979) (internal quotation marks omitted)).
80. Defendant COT/TPD working together in concert with SOF, with joint and several liability applicable, due to intentional fraud committed, were in violation of the Plaintiff’s 4th and 5th state and federal amendment rights, while being falsely searched; arrested; imprisoned; maliciously prosecuted; and wrongly processed by the court system during case 22-CF-2324-A, when no crime was committed by anyone except Jane Castor’s local concert. This was accomplished by the wrongful actions of Jane Castor instructing TPD agent cops working for COT. Both the Plaintiff and his wife were clearly injured by COT starting on 2-23-2022, using TPD officers while they worked in their official capacities, but were adhering to a different set of DHS Blue Campaign, management plans, polices and operating procedures, under a different and illegal, non-standard set of operating requirements, due to Jane Castor being technically the director of COT. The Blue Campaign, see Appendix A, was originally, and still is, for stopping the migration of immigrant slave laborers into America (typically Cuba and South America). It’s always been an informational and educational program to inform local law enforcement agencies what to look for, not for DHS to get involved in to the point of knowingly and intentionally violating DHS policies, due to having participated directly in illegal arrests, thus breaching human and civil rights it was supposedly trying to uphold for illegal aliens. During the latter part of 2021, DHS had specific mandatory operating requirements for informing local law enforcement agencies on how to identify and implement DHS’s Blue Campaign on violators, not to participate in doing so itself! DHS crossed the line, by conducting an unwarranted investigation on local Americans Mrs. Kimball and her husband, which resulted in him being falsely imprisoned for 225 days, with his wife suffering on the streets for 1.5 years until murdered, due to the no contact order illegally placed on the Plaintiff, initiated by DHS through Jane Castor’s local concert (COT/TPD/SOF).
81. The decision to adopt a different set of management plans, policies and operating procedures is a discretionary function, but its implementation of an incomplete or illegal set of them isn’t. In Maryls Bear Medicine v. United States (9th Cir. 2000) 241 F.3d 1208. When a state or federal agency has acted contrary to mandates or directives, imposing liability doesn’t require a court to second-guess legislative and administrative decisions grounded in social, economic or political policy. “When a suit charges an agency with failing to act in accord with a specific mandatory directive, the discretionary function exception doesn’t apply.” (Berkovitz, 486 U.S. at 544, 108 S.Ct. at 1963.) and (Faber v. United States (9th Cir. 1995) 56 F.3d 1122). A “failure to effectuate policy choices already made, will not be protected under the discretionary function exception.” (Id., 241 F.3d at 1215, emphasis added.)
82. Defendant COT failed to adhere to its STANDARD management plans, policies and operating procedures, opting to initiate an illegal type of DHS Blue Campaign, to intentionally injure the Plaintiff and his wife. Defendant COT was absolutely instructed by its superiors, DHS and Jane Castor, to adhere to a made up set of illegal Blue Campaign operational requirements, to intentionally injure the Plaintiff and his wife. Clearly the reason for the Plaintiff’s injuries (hindsight’s 20/20). During 2022, COT had specific mandatory operating requirements in place, but knowingly and intentionally adhered to a DIFFERENT set of illegal operating requirements, instructing its agent cops to use inapplicable Florida Chapter 825 and a set of illegal DHS’s Blue Campaign instructions on at least the Plaintiff and his wife. This is evident when COT/TPD agent cops, intentionally injured the Plaintiff and his wife, in violation of STANDARD MANDATES, imposed on COT/TPD by Jane Castor and Mark Braswell as their own set of made up operating requirements! Basically DHS’s Blue Campaign mandates are illegally changed whenever desired by DHS agents to implement a witch hunt for prosecuting any FRB marked consumer for actions taken that can be misconstrued as obtaining labor for free. What Agent Braswell from DHS in Orlando, Florida did, was illegally involve his agency in injuring the Plaintiff and his wife as an FRB retaliatory act through COT/TPD/SOF.
83. The Department of Homeland Security (see Appendix A) FUNDS COT/TPD and most local law enforcement agencies to keep them inline with what it wants and when it wants it by, or they’ll be investigated and charged like Judge Hannah Dugan, a Milwaukee County Circuit judge was. The Homeland Security provides to local state agencies, a suite of risk-based grants to assist state, local, tribal and territorial efforts in preventing, protecting against, mitigating, responding to and recovering from acts of terrorism and other threats. So they say. The point is COT/TPD; and Jane Castor have their hands in DHS’s pockets. Consequently if COT/TPD; and Jane Castor fail to take orders from DHS, they’re funding could quickly stop along with DHS perks!
84. A municipality or employee is a proper defendant under Title 42, Chapter 21, Section 1983, where the conduct complained of relates to an official municipal policy, custom, or practice causing the U.S. constitutional tort. Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs. of New York, 436 U.S. 658, 691, 98 S. Ct. 2018 (1972). If COT/TPD, or bastard Mayor Jane Castor, can produce any physical evidence of 1) Mrs. Kimball having been disabled under Florida Chapter 825; 2) the Plaintiff having been Mrs. Kimball’s caregiver; or 3) the Plaintiff having abused/stolen from Mrs. Kimball in violation of any Florida statue, he’ll drop this lawsuit! The corpus delicti rule requires that the prosecution present independent evidence to establish that a crime has occurred. This evidence should include physical evidence, which directly establishes the fact of a crime. In contrast, witness testimony alone in an affidavit ISN’T sufficient to establish corpus delicti. People v. McMahan. See Appendix B.
85. The funding of TPD comes from COT, which is FRB funded, directly and indirectly, by both the quasi-government FRB (DeSantis) and FRB commercial subsidiary banking investment corporations, like Chase Manhattan; Rothschild & Co. and their subsidiaries investments like Rockefeller Brothers Fund; Citigroup; Blackrock; Vanguard; and State Street shell corporations. And COT/TPD’s is funded through federal government agencies too like DHS, and by intra-governmental transfers.
86. COT (a municipality) is being sued in state court for their employees (about 4 dozen, including Jane Castor) having committed intentional and culpable torts while acting within the scope of agent employment, which 1) breached a state government policy. But is also being sued by the Plaintiff in federal court for having 2) implemented a state government policy in violation of their duty to the public under the U.S. Constitution. There were federal violations of, but not limited to, the following federal statutes by Jane Castor acting through COT; and TPD agent cops, along with concert member SOF: 1. Title 18, Chapter 13, U.S. Code § 241; 2. Title 42, Chapter 21, Section 1983; and Title 18, Chapter 13, U.S. Code § 241.
87. The federal statute of limitations in a circuit is tolled permanently on acts to defraud and deprive a plaintiff of his or her human/civil/constitutional rights done in conjunction with committing a Fraud on the Court, (F.S. 1540 or federal 60(b)(3)), or being at least an accessory after the fact (AATF) in a murder under Title 18, U.S. Code § 3, as is the case in this matter!
88. Racketeering under the RICO Act is automatically an intentional breach of government policy, at least according to state and federal constitutions; statutes; rules; duty to render aid; and common laws still in place!
89. The Federal Constitution, Florida Constitution, Florida state laws, rules and regulations, don’t allow immunity, if a state agent acted willfully, maliciously, fraudulently, in bad faith, beyond his or her authority, or under a mistaken interpretation of the law.
90. When determining whether qualified immunity applies, the central questions are: (1) whether the facts alleged, taken in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, demonstrate that the defendant’s conduct violated a statutory or constitutional right, and (2) whether the right at issue was clearly established. Committee To Protect Our Agricultural Water, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Occidental Oil and Gas Corporation, et al, Defendants. No. 1: 15–cv–01323–DAD–JLT. Signed 01/20/2017. Jane Castor and her co-conspiring agent cops through Defendant COT, absolutely knew what they had been committing on consumers periodically for years, violated the Plaintiff and his wife’s state and federal constitutional rights under the 4th amendment.
91. Government officials enjoy qualified immunity from civil damages, unless their conduct violates “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable prudent person would have known.” Jeffers v. Gomez, 267 F. 3d 895, 910 (9th Cir. 2001) (quoting Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818, 102 S. Ct. 2727, 73 L. Ed. 2d 396 (1982)); see also Bruce v. Ylst, 351 F. 3d 1283, 1290 (9th Cir. 2003).
92. According to the American Bar Association, Volume 18, Number 3 January/February 2009, by Razzano and Kristin H. Jones, since the enactment of 18 U.S.C. § 1346, federal courts have tried to step into this gap. They have divided the universe of honest services fraud into two spheres: public and private honest services fraud. Public honest services fraud is the instrument used by federal prosecutors to impose the federal government’s view of good government on state and local officials. Since the national government under our federal system cannot pass bribery or conflict of interest laws covering local and state officials, the honest services fraud statute has become its vehicle for enforcing its view of good government on state and local jurisdictions. The theory is that when a local or state official 1) takes a bribe, or 2) is embroiled in a conflict of interest, he or she defrauds the people of the state or locality of their right to that public official’s honest services. The courts have widely recognized two theories of honest services fraud in public-sector honest services fraud prosecutions: (1) bribery, where a public official was paid, with some type of valued benefit (not necessarily with money), for a particular decision or action, or (2) a failure to disclose a conflict of interest resulting in personal gain (something of value, but not necessarily monetary).
93. The 11th Circuit’s position is that “[p]ublic officials inherently owe a fiduciary duty to the public to make governmental decisions in the public’s best interest. ‘If the official instead secretly makes his decision based on his own personal interests. . . the official has defrauded the public of his honest services.’” United States v. DeVegter, 198 F. 3d 1324, 1328 (11th Cir. 1999) (quoting United States v. Lopez-Lukis, 102 F. 3d 1164, 1169 (11th Cir. 1997) (emphasis added) (internal citation omitted). The First, Fourth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuit Courts have all held that the federal statute does not limit the meaning of “honest services” to violations of state law.
94. Plaintiffs have been allowed to bring RICO actions for acts of public corruption that resulted in pecuniary (monetary) injury to them. Envtl. Tectonics V. W. S. Kirkpatrick, Inc., 847 F. 2d 1052, 1067 (3d Cir. 1988); (business competitor had standing to challenge defendant’s alleged use of bribery of foreign government officials to obtain contracts), judgment aff’d, 493 U.S. 400 (1990); Town of Kearny v. Hudson Meadows Urban Renewal Corp., 829 F. 2d 1263, 1268 (3d Cir. 1987) (land developer allowed to bring RICO action for injuries sustained from defendants’ bribery of town officials) and Bieter Co. v. Blomquist, 987 F. 2d 1319, 1327 (8th Cir. 1993) (permitting builder to pursue RICO claim where alleged bribery of public officials raised issue of fact concerning proximate cause of builder’s injury from failure to obtain rezoning). Also, all extortion statutes require that a threat must be made to the person or property of the victim. And a threat to harm a person in his or her career, job or reputation, is also an act of extortion.
95. Nowhere in America, does any statute acknowledge eye witness testimony as being the equivalent to physical/material evidence, and thus only witness testimony being substantial enough to accept as corpus delicti evidence needed to prosecute, or litigate an economic offence. If this were the case, sum sufficient evidence (more likely than not) of wrongs being committed, could be obtained merely by FRB contracted/paid agents, seeking to injure consumers physically/monetarily/emotionally for increased illegal spoils going, or staying in, FRB owned and operated corporate circulation. Consequently, the State of Florida failed to prove a prima facie case based on physical (material) evidence of a crime committed, so the Plaintiff’s conviction in case 22-CF-2324-A is VOID, due to both former state attorney Andrew Warren; Susan Lopez; Lynn Goudie; and Mellissa Grajales (court case 22-CF-2324-A) accepting and using only false agent cop testimony on official government forms with official letterheads and seals attached, when there was a bona fide conflict of interest present, for the purpose of injuring the Plaintiff and his wife, for FRB monetary and retaliatory purposes. Testimony evidence might be admissible if from unbiased witnesses, but it’s NOT material evidence of an offence committed! Many corrupt judges use witness testimony wrongly as if material evidence, but it’s not! If there’s no corpus delicti, thus no physical evidence amounting to a violation of statute, then there’s been no crime committed! TALK IS CHEAP LADIES! Witness testimony has wrongly been used by judges and prosecutors for decades to convict innocent parties for the FRB, which employs biased/bribed/extorted witnesses for illegal FRB profits/gains/retaliations! Consumer injuries occurring in both criminal/civil court cases, due to lying public/private, FRB contracted/paid/bribed agent witnesses, results in HUGE increases in consumers’ monetary losses going to the FRB owners, by way of either government agencies/agents; but mostly by vendor agent thieves; or private agent thieves making FRB purchases with consumers’ stolen moneys on FRB goods at 500% to 1000% markups. COPS and JUDGES aren’t neutral unbiased witnesses to crimes to be used in place of physical/material evidence when needing to substantiate statute violations! COPS and JUDGES work for, and are contracted/paid/bribed agents of the FRB, a privately owned and operated funding/investing/organization/cartel/enterprise.
96. Witness testimony often fills gaps when physical evidence is unavailable. It provides firsthand accounts that can corroborate or contradict other non-material evidence. However, its reliability is carefully examined, as human testimony can be falsely made on purpose, due to witnesses being paid by the same entities as the ones who benefit from the testimony. Witnesses are excluded from testifying, if there is a conflict of interest to tell the truth because of who they work for, as is the case with expert witness cops (officers of the court). A conflict of interests will disqualify an expert witness from testifying on behalf of a party (State of Florida). If there’s a concern that an expert witness has, or will illegally provide false testimony to financially benefit their employer, the witness will be disqualified. Any expert can have a conflict of interest. Such a conflict may exist, if the expert has been formerly employed by, or previously hired as, an expert for the opposing side. This is the case with judges, cops and attorneys (officers of the court) working for the State of Florida! They’re all employed by FRB owners/controllers through their FRB contracted/paid/bribed/coerced/extorted/agencies/corporations! Consequently, FRB contracted/paid/bribed/extorted cops, attorneys and judges, working together with FRB owners/controllers as a multilevel retaliatory group against blacklisted consumers, implementing RICO predicate acts on them, is called RACKETEERING, which always results in liability through the 4 Doctrines of law cited! Agent caused physical injuries ALWAYS results in consumer monetary losses, ultimately going to the FRB owners who fund/bribe/extort/invest in just about every mixed market business under the sun. And this knowingly makes them MAJOR END RECIPIENTS of hot cash flows during illegal commerce based transactions!
97. COT, a municipality, operates under its own local government charter.
98. Sovereign immunity doesn’t apply in this matter to any of the Defendants:
(A). Where there are state and federal operational decisions made as to how policies will be implemented, there’s no governmental sovereign immunity from policy violations! What Jane Castor did through COT/TPD, was adhere to a made up illegal management plan; policy; and operating procedure, while racketeering, which were breaches of state and federal standard mandated ones!
99. Relevant Statements of Fact against the State of Florida (SOF):
100. State of Florida agents A) Andrew Warren; and B) Susan Lopez, wrongly prosecuted the Plaintiff from 3/2022 to 12/2023 in case 22-CF-2324-A, when no crime was committed by anyone except government agents. SOF committed 3 other injuries on the Plaintiff in 2025, but before 8- 21-25. These 3 injuries committed in 2025, before 8-21-25, tolls the statute to file on SOF for all the violations committed, by at least another 3 years. And C) Ronald Desantis from case 25-CA-564 in 5/2025, refused to investigate as his mandatory constitutional duty – – under Florida’s Constitution, Section 6, Article 4:
1) what was on the full Take 5, FHP obtained, murder video of the Plaintiff’s wife; 2) the Plaintiff being exonerated from the false conviction in case 22-CF-2324-A; 3) the Plaintiff having his mother and wife’s murders officially looked into; and 4) the Plaintiff obtaining Mrs. Kimball’s medical records from TGH (again case 25-CA-564). AHCA denied the Plaintiff’s TGH complaint on 7/2025, which requested AHCA to officially order TGH to provide him his wife’s medical records. See Appendix A. To date, the Plaintiff has not obtained these records. Consequently, the Plaintiff is STILL being defrauded by SOF through Desantis (case 25-CA-564 appealed); AHCA records request denied by ACHA in Appendix A; and FHP not allowing the Plaintiff his wife’s full murder video from case 24-CA-7358, all still denied at the time he files this complaint.
101. This is a lawsuit where the Continuous Tort Doctrine is definitely applicable. The first set of SOF injuries happened in 3/2022 when it through Andrew Warren, wrongly filed the paperwork to prosecute the Plaintiff with nonexistent physical evidence of: 1) neglect and 2) theft violations, filed with his office by DHS through Jane Castor’s local concert (SOF/COT/TPD). Damages from this case lasted until 12/2023 when the Plaintiff was released from jail. The next set of injuries occurred in 5/2025, when SOF through Governor Desantis, who illegally came into case 25-CA-564 after a default judgment was file on him by the Clerk of the Court of Leon County, requested that Judge Sjostrom illegally dismiss the case to stop the Plaintiff from acquiring more evidence to sue TGH/DHS/COT/SOF; and Jane Castor for any injuries its agents caused him and his wife. Now the Plaintiff can sue TGH for spoliation of evidence in his wife’s aggravated manslaughter (murder).
102. TGH is believed to have intentionally finishing Mrs. Kimball off by committing a breach of its hospital regulatory procedures – – TGH should’ve quickly remove a bone fragment lodged in Mrs. Kimball’s brain. After which ACHA in 7/2025 denied the Plaintiff’s request to order TGH to provide him with his wife’s medical records (Appendix A), wrongly claiming he had supposedly asked ACHA, not TGH, for his wife’s medical records. A total bull chip lie! AHCA doesn’t store medical records from hospitals! The Plaintiff begged ACHA starting in the beginning of 2024 for his wife’s medical records, while Kim Smoak laughed in his ear and then hung up the phone. See Appendix A.
103. SOF was a concert member participant involved with DHS/COT/TPD in this matter, when Jane Castor had authorized the illegal detaining of Mrs. Kimball on 2-23-22, using TPD agent cops. After 3 weeks, Mrs. Kimball was shown the streets by TPD agent cops with nowhere to go and where Attorney Matthew Kimball McDowell found her 3 month later in Pinellas County Florida, living and sleeping on CONCRETE without her medications! If Mrs. Kimball was really SOF’s witness, where was the physical evidence given to them by COT/TPD before or after the Plaintiff’s arrest to prove a crime was committed by him? It certainly wasn’t placed into case file 22-CF-2324-A. If after COT/TPD having given SOF, NO testimony it could use to prosecute the Plaintiff with (no affidavit signed, or audio/video filed in case 22-CF-2324- A, incriminating the Plaintiff in any Florida statute violation), and SOF/COT/TPD/DHS; and Jane Castor knew Mrs. Kimball was disabled and in need of her medications, which her attorney Matthew McDowell provided to her on the streets only once, multiple state and city agents, like Jane Castor; Andrew Warren; Susan Lopez; Lynn Goudie; and Mellissa Grajales, are at least culpably negligent in her aggravated manslaughter (MURDER), by having intentionally violated the survival action statute (F.S. 46.021) by keeping her on the streets, with the false no contact order on her husband, currently still in place!
104. The statute for malicious prosecution is 4 years from the time case 22-CF-2324-A ended under F.S. 95.11. And a complaint for wrongful death, has to be filed 2 years from the date of death. SOF’s second tort committed on the Plaintiff was 5 months before the wrongful death of Mrs. Kimball tolled, which is at the time of the last filed amended complaint. Consequently the defrauding of the Plaintiff by Desantis in 5/2025; FHP in early 2025; and AHCA in 7/2025, tolls the wrongful death and survival action statutes for suing SOF for another three (3.5) years, with no statute of limitations for crimes committed involving murder under the RICO Act. This gives SOF its 6 months to investigate all the injuries it’s liable for through its agents.
105. Continuous torts – – federal courts have found the statute of limitations must accrue from the date of the last wrongful act where there is another separate wrong committed by the same entity. Leonhard v United States, 633 F. 2d 599, 613 (2d Cir. 1980). Thus, under the continuous violation doctrine, “the limitation period for a continuing offence does not began until the offence, or offences, are completed.” United States v Rivera-Ventura, 72 F. 3d 277, 281 (2d Cir. 1995). The nature of Plaintiff’s claim is such that the 1) continued Fraud on the Court committed by DeSantis; the 2) defrauding of the Plaintiff out of his wife’s medical records by AHCA; and FHP committing a Fraud on the Court to do the Plaintiff out of his wife’s full murder video, all happened in 2025, as well as other facts and information relating thereto, constitutes a continuing tort violation by SOF for at least an addition 3.5 years in both state and federal court. Whether Mrs. Kimball could’ve been saved, had a medical procedure been correctly performed (malpractice), or had the procedure been performed in a timely fashion in accordance with state and federal hospital medical regulations (wrongful death), the wrongful spoliation of records allowed to stand by SOF through AHCA, haven’t been corrected! So the plaintiff is still being injured by SOF. Consequently, SOF is still liable to the Plaintiff for damages resulting from court cases 22-CF-2324-A; 21-CF-006147-A; 24-CA-7358; 25-CA-564; and AHCA – – the Plaintiff was not able to obtain his wife’s medical records to have sued TGH for any particular type of injury within the 2 year statute of limitations. Every time an SOF employee intentionally defrauds the Plaintiff by committing a NEW OFFENCE on him, they monetary injure him, SAVING the FRB moneys due to racketeering. Yes the FRB, because there’s no other reason for FRB contracted/paid/bribed public and private agents intentionally committing racketeering type frauds on perfect strangers like the Plaintiff and his wife, but to profit their benefactors the FRB!
106. State Attorney Andrew Warren and Susan Lopez illegally prosecuted the Plaintiff with no corpus delicti and no prima facie case made. They had sneaky; obvious; and mean prosecutor Mellissa Grajales; and twisted Judge Goudie, knowingly and intentionally lie for the State of Florida, on record in case 22-CF-2324-A (watch the films in Appendix E), that the Plaintiff had supposedly:
(1). Stolen over $50,000 of his wife’s money;
(2). Abused his wife by making her relieve herself in a bucket;
(3). Didn’t properly care for his wife when she was supposedly disabled under Florida Chapter 825; and
(4). The Plaintiff was supposedly his wife’s caregiver, due to a 2012 cancelled guardian advocacy contract, all without producing one bit of physical evidence substantiating these blatant lies!
107. SOF is being sued in state court for dozens of its agents having committed a negligent or intentional tort while acting within the scope of his or her employment, which 1) breached a state government policy (Andrew Warren; Susan Lopez; Lynn Goudie; Mellissa Grajales). And it’s also being sued in federal court, for having 2) implemented a government policy in violation of their duty to the public under the U.S. Constitution. The plaintiff is suing SOF in federal court under, but not limited to the following: 1) Title 28, Chapter 190, Section 5001; 2) (Title 18, Chapter 13, U.S. Codes § 241); 3) Title 42, Chapter 21, Section 1983; and 4) Title 18, Chapter 13, U.S. Code § 241. Punitive damages and attorney’s fees are owed for common law frauds and breaches of fiduciary duties to the public by municipalities. “A public official, acts as trustee for the citizens and the State … and thus owes the normal fiduciary duties of a trustee, e.g., honesty and loyalty to them.” United States v. Kincaid-Chauncey, 556 F. 3d 923, 939 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting United States v. Silvano, 812 F. 2d 754, 759 (1st Cir. 1987) and United States v. Mandel, 591 F. 2d 1347, 1363 (4th Cir. 1979) (internal quotation marks omitted)).
108. Defendant SOF was working with DHS/COT/TPD; and Jane Castor, through SOF agents Andrew Warren and Susan Lopez, but both of them were adhering to a different set of management plans, polices and operating procedures, a type of racketeering plan for the purpose of injuring the Plaintiff and his wife. So consequently SOF was operating under a different, NON-STANDARD set of operating requirements, due to Jane Castor being technically the director of the local FRB contracted/paid/bribed CONCERT which included Andrew Warren and Susan Lopez.
109. SOF (a municipality) is being sued in state court for its agents/employees (DeSantis; Warren; Lopez; Smoak) having committed culpable and/or intentionally torts while acting within the scope of his or her employment which 1) breached a state government policy. It’s also being sued in federal court for having 2) implemented a state government policy in violation of their duty to the public under the U.S. Constitution – – 1. Title 18, Chapter 13, U.S. Codes § 241; 2. Title 42, Chapter 21, Section 1983; and Title 18, Chapter 13, U.S. Code § 241.
110. Counts; with elements of; and statute violations for Defendant Dawson:
111. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations and legal precedence set forth in paragraphs 1 through 60 as if fully set forth herein.
The Plaintiff is seeking compensation (relief) from Defendant Dawson due to being Mrs. Kimball’s spouse.
The specific criminal/civil violations Defendant Dawson committed with his unidentified passenger, which injured the Plaintiff and his wife, as at least reasonably proven probable (sum sufficient) in the Appendices:
Count 1: Wrongful Death (768.16) – – against Dawson and his passenger;
112. Dawson and his passenger are seen in both the full FHP and enclosed partial FHP video, striking down Mrs. Kimball with his car, while she was walking within a crosswalk with the right of way, due to being a pedestrian under F.S. 316.130(9);
Count 2: Wrongful Death Damages ((768.21) – – against Dawson and his passenger;
113. Dawson and his passenger are both liable for culpable or intentional injuries sustained by Mrs. Kimball when they both contributed to violating F.S. 316.130(9), by apparently looking to cause her some sort of injure on purpose;
Count 3: Survival Action (46.021 & 3.5 days) – – against Dawson and his passenger;
114. Dawson and his passenger caused Mrs. Kimball’s survival action damages after the accident they caused, because her death was not immediate, lasting 3.5 days;
Count 3: Aggravated Manslaughter under F.S. 782.07(1), by violation of F.S. 316.130(9) – – against Dawson and his passenger;
115. Dawson was at least culpable or intentional in having caused Mrs. Kimball’s injuries, as seen in the partial video, along with witness testimony that the vehicular injuries to Mrs. Kimball were culpably or intentionally caused by Dawson and his occupant, because Dawson’s car never slowed down until he violated F.S. 316.130(9), by hitting Mrs. Kimball;
Count 4: RICO Act violation under F.S. 895.02(1)(a)(b) as an association-in-fact members – – against Dawson and his passenger;
116. Dawson was acting in concert with at least his fleeing passenger as an association-in-fact enterprise under Title 18, Chapter 96, Sections 1962(c & d), out to injure Mrs. Kimball for supposedly stealing their street drugs, according to credible testimony from a dozen witnesses, which will be sum sufficiently proven, or this Count will be removed after discovery, when Dawson’s passenger is also identified with his deposition taken;
Relief sought:
117. Money amounts the Plaintiff’s seeking from Defendant Dawson and his passenger in this complaint, are for personal injuries:
A. Economic damages amount to roughly $400,000. USD for Mrs. Kimball’s lost SSI income from age 41 to 75 (34 years’ worth);
B. punitive and non-economic amounts for the Plaintiff’s own personal pain and suffering, along with Mrs. Kimball’s personal injury – – 3.5 days’ of being made to survive at TGH without the proper treatments given at the proper time, totaling well over $60. million USD, by referencing verdicts on similar federal and state violations, where there’s a capable or intentional tort to injure.
118. Counts; with elements of; and statute violations for Defendant TGH:
119. Plaintiff repeats and realledges the allegations and legal precedence set forth in paragraphs 1 through 53; and 61 through 73 as if fully set forth herein.
The Plaintiff is seeking compensation (relief) from Defendant TGH due to being Mrs. Kimball’s spouse; and under the Law of Agency; Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines;
The specific criminal/civil violations Defendant TGH is liable for through its owner John Couris and his TGH staff members, which injured the Plaintiff and his wife, as at least reasonably proven probable (sum sufficient) in the Appendixes:
Count 1: TGH owner and FRB contracted/paid agent John Couris through the State of Florida, is a TGH perpetrator/owner under F.S. 895.02(1)(a)(b) – – a TGH concert level position – – against TGH;
120. TGH was racketeering in concert with the FRB funded State of Florida, through Ronald DeSantis as TGH’s source of funding and investing, again the FRB, by illegally keeping medical information about the murder of Mrs. Kimball from her husband, violations of state and federal laws under the RICO Act (predicate acts committed under, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155;
Count 2: Wrongful Death (768.16) – – under – – against TGH;
121. TGH is liable for any pain; suffering; and death that it caused Mrs. Kimball, by not acting properly according to hospital policies; procedures; and regulatory standards;
122. TGH covering up evidence of her murder as an AATF, to protect Dawson & his passenger; the FRB; and FRB affiliates like TGH from liability;
Count 3: Wrongful death Damages (768.21)are owed – – against TGH;
123. TGH is liable to compensate for any pain; suffering; and death that it caused Mrs. Kimball, by not acting properly according to hospital policies; procedures; and regulatory standards; and by covering up evidence of her murder as an AATF, to protect Dawson and his passenger; the FRB; and FRB affiliates like TGH from liability;
Count 4: Survival Action (for 3.5 days under F.S. 46.021) – – against TGH;
124. TGH is liable to compensate for any pain; and suffering it caused to Mrs. Kimball for 3.5 days by not acting properly according to hospital policies; procedures; and regulatory standards; and by covering up evidence of her murder as an AATF, to protect Dawson; the FRB; and FRB affiliates like TGH from liabilities;
Count 5: Tortious Interference under F.S. 768.72/§§ 95.11(3)(o & p) – – against TGH;
125. (1) TGH is liable for any intentional or culpable,, acts or omissions, which caused injuries to Mrs. Kimball, when it spoliated critical evidence of her murder (culpable or intentional);
126. (2) TGH is liable as an accessory after the fact (AATF) in at least the aggravated manslaughter of Mrs. Kimball, for concealing medical record evidence directly at TGH, and in case 24-CA-7358, by violating Sections 1341; 1343; 1346; Chapter 817; and Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341’ 1343, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155 as an accomplice with the judge in case 24-CA-7358;
127. (3) John Couris through TGH, was the managing TGH agent participants under F.S. 112.3173(e)(6);
128. (4) John Couris was working in concert as an FRB funded and invested in association-in-fact enterprise member during case 24-CA-7358 with SOF (FHP) as another party to this case; and with FRB contracted/paid Ronald DeSantis, the respondent in case 25-CA-564, to conceal Mrs. Kimball’s medical records from the Plaintiff during TGH case 24-CA-7358 and directly at TGH;
Count 6: 14th amendment right violation – – TGH is liable for violating the Plaintiff’s 14th amendment rights, due to having committed a violation of F.S. 395.3025(1) (medical records request) – – against TGH;
129. TGH violated F.S. 395.3025(1) and the 14th amendment rights of the Plaintiff directly at TGH, when no probate actions were in effect, only the Plaintiff supposedly not being Mrs. Kimball’s husband, with the local Clerk of the Court having recorded the 2010 marriage certificate as authentic;
Count 7: Honest Services Fraud violations – – TGH committed honest services frauds under Fla. Stat. §838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895; AND Chapter 817.155 directly at TGH and during case 24-CA-7358 (private and public scams to defraud Plaintiff out of honest services directly at TGH; and in case 24-CA-7358) – – against TGH;
130. TGH committed state and federal honest services frauds violations directly at TGH and in court case 24-CA-7358, by misrepresenting to the Plaintiff; the court; and many others, that the Plaintiff wasn’t married to Mrs. Kimball to conceal her medical records from him, to apparently save TGH; State of Florida; and there FRB funding and investing source moneys;
Count 8: 5th amendment right violations in court case 24-CA-7358 – – against TGH;
131. TGH deliberately misrepresented a few times to the court during case 24-CA-7358, that the Plaintiff wasn’t married to Mrs. Kimball, when it had in possession a filed copy of Mrs. Kimball’s marriage license prior to this Pure Bill of Discover case;
Count 9: TGH has standing to be sued for its agents perpetrated wrongs on all Counts, due to the Law of Agency; Vicarious Liability; Imputation; and Respondeat Superior Doctrines – – against TGH;
132. TGH agents violated both the plaintiff’s 5th amendment rights in case 24-CA-7358 and his 14th amendment rights directly at TGH, by concealing his wife’s medical records from him. TGH also has standing to be sued for all its agents’ perpetrated wrongs, due to the Law of Agency; Vicarious Liability; Imputation; and Respondeat Superior Doctrines. Any wrongful acts committed by TGH employees while Mrs. Kimball was under their Duty of Care, allows either John Couris or TGH, to be sued for Mrs. Kimball’s damages;
Count 10: Florida Chapter 843, Obstructing Justice 843.14, Compounding Felony violation – – against TGH;
133. TGH knowingly and intentionally committed a criminal violation of obstructing justice when it concealed Mrs. Kimball’s medical records to benefit TGH; and its funding and investing sources – – the State of Florida and the FRB, because she was in fact murdered, which involved FRB contracted/paid government agents and the FRB;
Count 11: Fraud on the Court violation in case 24-CA-7358 (F.S. 1540) – – against TGH;
134. TGH knowingly and intentionally committed a Fraud on the Court in court case 24-CA-7358, when it stated orally and in writing, the Plaintiff wasn’t married to Mrs. Kimball;
Count 12: Spoliation of medical records under FloridaRCP 1.380(b)(2) – – against TGH;
135. TGH is liable for all of Mrs. Kimball’s injuries as if it caused them, by spoliating her medical record evidence as to who was involved in causing her death the most, either Defendant Dawson or TGH;
Count 13: Fla. Stat. §838.022(a); (b); (c), under F.S. 895, (private and public scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services, implemented by the FRB and initiated through TGH in case 24-CA-7358 and through AHCA – – against TGH;
136. TGH is in violation of both state and federal honest services, committed by any and all of its employees during case 24-CA-7358, due to it being a racketeering participant under the RICO Act, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155;
Count 14: F.S. §112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346), (private and public scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services, implemented by the FRB and initiated through TGH in case 24-CA-7358 and through AHCA – – against TGH;
137. TGH is in violation of both state and federal honest services, committed by any and all of its employees during case 24-CA-7358, due to it being a racketeering participant under the RICO Act, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155;
Count 15: Title 18, Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895, (private and public scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services, implemented by the FRB and initiated through TGH in case 24-CA-7358 and through AHCA – – against TGH;
138. TGH is in violation of both state and federal honest services, committed by any and all of its employees during case 24-CA-7358, due to it being a racketeering participant under the RICO Act, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155;
Count 16: F.S. Chapter 817.155, (private and public scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services, implemented by the FRB and initiated through TGH in case 24-CA-7358 and through AHCA – – against TGH;
139. TGH is in violation of both state and federal honest services, committed by any and all of its employees during case 24-CA-7358, due to it being a racketeering participant under the RICO Act, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155;
Relief sought:
140. Money amounts the Plaintiff’s seeking from Defendant TGH in this complaint for personal injuries:
A. Economic damages amount to roughly $400,000. USD for Mrs. Kimball’s lost SSI income from age 41 to 75 (34 years’ worth);
B. punitive and non-economic amounts for the Plaintiff’s own personal pain and suffering, along with Mrs. Kimball’s personal injury – – 3.5 days’ worth by being made to survive at TGH without the proper treatments given at the proper time, total well over $60. million USD, by referencing verdicts on similar federal and state violations.
141. Counts; with elements of; and statute violations for Defendant COT:
142. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations and legal precedence set forth in paragraphs 1 through 53; and 74 through 98 as if fully set forth herein.
The Plaintiff is seeking compensation (relief) from Defendant COT, due to being Mrs. Kimball’s spouse; under the Law of Agency; Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines; and for being the defendant in case 22-CF-2324-A:
The specific criminal/civil violations Defendant COT is liable for through Jane Castor and her local concert of SOF/COT/TPD participating agents in this matter (Appendix B), which injured the Plaintiff, as at least reasonably proven probable (sum sufficient) in the Appendixes:
Count 1: COT employee and FRB contracted/paid agent Jane Castor, an COT perpetrator/manager of her local concert (COT/TPD/SOF) under F.S. 895.02(1)(a)(b) – – a COT concert level position – – against COT;
143. Jane Castor was racketeering in concert with COT; SOF; DHS; and TPD agents, to illegally injure both the Plaintiff and his wife physically, emotionally and monetarily, violations of state and federal laws under, but not limited to, RICO predicate acts committed in violation of Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Seciton 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; 1513, under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155 (honest services frauds committed for retaliatory purposes);
Count 2: Wrongful Death (768.16) of Mrs. Kimball, due to SOF/COT/TPD having relocated Mrs. Kimball to the streets of Clearwater; Tampa; and Brandon, Florida, telling her each time not to go home, which lasted for 1.5 years until her murder – – against COT;
144. COT is liable for TPD having relocated Mrs. Kimball to the streets of Clearwater; Tampa; and Brandon, Florida, telling her each time not to go home, which lasted for 1.5 years until her murder, due to an illegal no contact order on her husband, required in abuse cases, with no one removing this false order still in place, when the Plaintiff had asked his attorneys to do so, along with Mrs. Kimball having asked Matthew McDowell, Esq. to do so (due diligence). Matthew McDowell was the one who wrote Mrs. Kimball’s affidavits for her to sign, and had them to file, but never submitted them with a hearing request (Appendix A), but Mrs. Kimball’s murder was mainly due to FRB/DHS contracted/paid Jane Castor; and COT/SOF/TPD all being joint and several liability partners in the intentional frauds committed on the Plaintiff and his wife, when all agents involved knew no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 3: Wrongful Death Damages (768.21) are owed, due Mrs. Kimball being forced off her medications and made to live on the streets by SOF agents – – against COT;
145. COT through TPD, was a coconspirator with DHS/SOF, when it initiated the illegal search; arrest; prosecution; process; murder; and survival action damages committed in this matter, when it knew no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A. COT is liable for all damages to the Plaintiff and his wife through its employees, due to the Law of Agency; Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines, when it knew no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 4: Survival Action for 1.5 years (46.021) – – against COT;
146. Due to Mrs. Kimball being forced off her medications and made to live on the streets by COT agents, due to being told by TPD from 3/2022 to 8-19-23, not to go home because of the false no contact order on her husband, when it knew no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A, COT is liable for any pain and suffering its employees caused Mrs. Kimball, by wrongly making her live on the streets for 1.5 years, due to an illegal no contact order on her husband, not on her;
147. And Mrs. Kimball, due to the no contact order being ONLY on her husband, was legally allowed to continue living at home, when the Plaintiff was the sole owner of the property and technically didn’t have to leave;
Count 5: F.S. 782.07(1) (aggravated manslaughter) Jane Castor; and COT, through TPD, knowingly and intentionally put Mrs. Kimball in need of the bare necessities in order to survive, on the streets to live in Clearwater, then again in Tampa, then again in Brandon, for SOF to continue wrongly prosecuting the Plaintiff for violations of probation, when Mrs. Kimball would keep legally returning to her house, turning a blind eyes to her suffering from 2-22 to 8/23, when it knew no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A – – against COT;
148. COT is at least capably negligent in the aggravated manslaughter of Mrs. Kimball, with Jane Castor placed permanently in a prison cell, due to no crime having been committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 6: The Plaintiff’s False Imprisonment by COT for 225 Days, a violation under Florida Statute 787.02 – – against COT;
149. COT, due to it being a racketeering participant in this matter under the RICO Act, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a);(b);&(c) and 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513 (e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, is liable for the Plaintiff’s False Imprisonment, when it helped wrongly put him in jail three (3) times, when it knew no crime was committed in court case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 7: Malicious Prosecution of the Plaintiff, by COT employee Jane Castor’s local concert – – against COT;
150. Both DHS; and Jane Castor orchestrated and initiated this illegal matter through COT/TPD/SOF. So participant COT/TPD was in violation of, but not limited to, under Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895. So COT’s liable for the Malicious Prosecution of the plaintiff during case 22-CF-2324-A, when it knew no crime was committed;
Count 8: Abuse of Process of the Plaintiff, by COT employee Jane Castor’s local concert – – against COT;
151. Both DHS; and Jane Castor orchestrated and initiated this illegal matter through COT/TPD/SOF. So participant COT/TPD was in violation of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895. So COT’s liable for the Malicious Prosecution of the plaintiff during case 22-CF-2324-A, when it knew no crime was committed;
Count 9: Fraud on the Court (F.S. 1540) in court cases 22-CF-2324-A was committed by COT, due to being a participant under the RICO Act with DHS/SOF/TPD; and Jane Castor, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A – – against COT;
152. COT was a concert member involved in the prosecution of the Plaintiff, when Judge Goudie defrauded the Plaintiff herself, and allowed SOF to do the same in her kangaroo court, as if deaf, dumb and blind, acting as a racketeering participant under the RICO Act, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A – – against COT;
Count 10: Title 18, Chapter 73, Section 1513, an FRB retaliation crime under F.S. 895, initiated by DHS; and Jane Castor through SOF/COT/TPD (Jane Castor’s local concert) – – against COT;
153. COT was working in concert with Jane Castor; DHS/SOF/TPD to commit retaliatory acts for the purpose of physical; emotional; and monetary injuring the Plaintiff and his wife, committed in violation of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A, implemented by the John Rockefeller and his think tank, after the Plaintiff threatened to sue the FRB through John in 2020 for obtaining his laundered inheritance beginning around 2000;
Count 11: COT has standing to be sued for agent perpetrated wrongs on all Counts, due to the Law of Agency; Vicarious Liability; Imputation; and Respondeat Superior Doctrines – – against COT;
154. COT is liable for any of its employees’ wrongful actions and omissions which caused the Plaintiff and his wife damages, due to Vicarious Liability; Imputation; Respondeat Superior Doctrines and the Law of Agency;
Count 12: F.S. §112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346), (private and public scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services, implemented by the FRB and initiated through COT in cases 22-CF-2324-A and 21-CF-006147-A – – against COT;
155. COT is in violation of both state and federal honest services, committed by any and all of its employees during cases 22-CF-2324-A; & 21-CF-006147-A, starting from 2/22, due to it being a racketeering participant under the RICO Act, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 13: Title 18, Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895, (private and public scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services, implemented by the FRB and initiated through COT in cases 22-CF-2324-A and 21-CF-006147-A – – against COT;
156. COT is in violation of both state and federal honest services, committed by any and all of its employees during cases 22-CF-2324-A & 21-CF-006147-A, starting from 2/22, due to it being a racketeering participant under the RICO Act, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 14: F.S. Chapter 817.155, (private and public scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services, implemented by the FRB and initiated through SOF in cases 22-CF-2324-A and 21-CF-006147-A – – against COT;
157. COT is in violation of both state and federal honest services, committed by any and all of its employees during cases 22-CF-2324-A & 21-CF-006147-A, starting from 2/22, due to it being a racketeering participant under the RICO Act, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 15: Fla. Stat. §838.022(a); (b); (c); §112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346) – – private and public scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services, implemented by the FRB, and initiated through DHS/SOF/TPD/COT in cases 22-CF-2324-A & 21-CF-006147-A – – against COT;
158. COT is in violation of both state and federal honest services, committed by any and all of its employees during cases 22-CF-2324-A & 21-CF-006147-A, starting from 2-22, due to it being a racketeering participant under the RICO Act, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f),under F.S. 895, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 16: COT is liable for theft; conversion; and destruction of the Plaintiff and his wife’s properties within their house by TPD, under F.S. 771.11(1) & 812.014 – – against COT;
159. COT committed theft; conversion; and destruction of Plaintiff and his wife’s properties within their house through TPD, so it now owes the Plaintiff 50% on $60,000. USD, before and during case 22-CF-2324-A (crimes committed on both 2-24-22 & 7-26-23).
Count 17: 4th amendment right violations – – against COT;
160. FRB/DHS/COT/SOF through TPD violated the Plaintiff and his wife’s rights to not have their house searched; property stolen; converted; and damaged during 3 illegal TPD searches; and a fourth (4) illegal one by federal marshals after Judge Lynn Goudie issued a false warrant for the Plaintiff’s arrest, because he supposedly knew his wife was around the corner at the northern intersection from his home address, when he was driving his car down his block. Marshals used his illegally obtained house keys from within his pocket for 45 minutes, to go to his house and search it, permanently keeping his wallet with its full contents, possibly for SOF/COT/TPD to go through, but it was never to be seen by the Plaintiff again;
161. Due to Jane Castor; FRB/SOF/COT/TPD, an illegal concert, the Plaintiff was illegally arrested on: 2-24-22; and again by federal marshals on the street a few months later, complements of criminal minded Lynn Goudie; and a third time on 7-26-23;
162. FRB/SOF/COT/TPD; and Jane Castor, illegally imprisoned the Plaintiff for 225 days in total;
163. Jane Castor; and FRB/DHS/SOF/COT/TPD agents illegally removed Mrs. Kimball from her home, or made her leave it, each time they found her at home, keeping her on the streets to be foreseeably injured or killed.
Relief sought:
164. Money amounts the Plaintiff’s seeking from Defendant COT in this complaint for personal injuries:
A. Economic damages amount to roughly $400,000. USD for Mrs. Kimball’s lost SSI income from age 41 to 75 (34 years’ worth);
B. 50% shared expense by SOF; and TPD, in $60,000. USD owed, for TPD stealing and damaging $20,000. USD of the Plaintiff and his wife’s properties within their home, during two (2) illegal TPD searches, implemented on 2-24-22 & 7-26-23, violations under F.S. §772.11 (1), 5 year statute of limitations, see court documents Appendix B. COT has now been given 30 days to pay the Plaintiff $30,000. USD. (Appendix B & court case 22-CF-2324-A) (Attorney Joseph Davis, the Plaintiff’s former attorney, is a witness to the thefts and damages);
C. 50% shared expense by TPD; and SOF, in TPD’s illegal search of Plaintiff’s house on 7-26-23, due to no search warrant while still being illegally prosecuted by SOF up until 12/2023, costing him $3,500. USD in legal fees from Attorney Joseph Davis – – so $1,750 USD is the amount both SOF and COT owe the Plaintiff;
D. the Plaintiff’s punitive and non-economic amounts for his own personal pain and suffering, along with Mrs. Kimball’s personal injury – – 1.5 years’ of being made to survive on the streets by FRB/DHS/SOF/COT/TPD; and Jane Castor, all non-economic/punitive, intentional/culpable, torts/scams, all committed by FRB contracted/paid agents, total well over $60. million USD, by referencing verdicts on similar federal and state violations.
165. Counts; with elements of; and statute violations for Defendant SOF:
166. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations and legal precedence set forth in paragraphs 1 through 53; and 99 through 109 as if fully set forth herein.
The Plaintiff is seeking compensation (relief) from Defendant SOF due to being Mrs. Kimball’s spouse and under Law of Agency; Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines; and for being the defendant in bogus case 22-CF-2324-A:
The specific criminal/civil violations Defendant SOF is liable for committing through Andrew Warren; Susan Lopez; Ronald DeSantis; and Kim Smoak, which injured the Plaintiff and his wife, as at least reasonably proven probable (sum sufficient) in the Appendixes – – against SOF;
Count 1: Andrew Warren; Susan Lopez; Ronald DeSantis; and Kim Smoak – – SOF perpetrators/managers of Jane Castor’s local concert under F.S. 895.02(1)(a)(b) – – SOF concert level position – – against SOF;
167. SOF was racketeering in concert with Jane Castor; and DHS/COT/TPD, before and during cases 22-CF-2324-A and 21-CF-006147-A, to illegally injure both the Plaintiff and his wife physically, emotionally and monetarily, due to it being a racketeering participant under the RICO Act, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A – – against COT;
Count 2: Wrongful Death (768.16) of Mrs. Kimball, due to SOF/COT/TPD having relocated Mrs. Kimball to the streets of Clearwater; Tampa; and Brandon, Florida, telling her each time not to go home, which lasted for 1.5 years until her murder – – against SOF;
168. SOF is liable for the illegal no contact order on her husband, required in abuse cases, with no one removing this false order still in place, when the Plaintiff had asked his attorneys to do so, along with Mrs. Kimball having asked Matthew McDowell, Esq. to do so (due diligence). Matthew McDowell was the one who wrote Mrs. Kimball’s affidavits for her to sign, and had them to file, but never submitted them with a hearing request (Appendix A), but Mrs. Kimball’s murder was mainly due to FRB/DHS contracted/paid Jane Castor; and COT/SOF/TPD all being joint and several liability partners in the intentional frauds committed on the Plaintiff and his wife, when all agent involved knew no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 3: Wrongful Death Damages (768.21) are owed, due Mrs. Kimball being forced off her medications and made to live on the streets by SOF agents – – against SOF;
169. SOF was a coconspirator working in conjunction with DHS/COT/TPD agents, who told Mrs. Kimball she couldn’t go home from 3.2022 to 8-19-23, because of the false no contact order on her husbands. SOF was a concert member which helped initiate the illegal search; arrest; prosecution; process; murder; and survival action damages committed in this matter. SOF is liable for all damages to the Plaintiff and his wife through its employees, due to the Law of Agency; Imputation; Respondeat Superior; and Vicarious Liability Doctrines, when it knew no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 4: Survival Action for 1.5 years (46.021), due to Mrs. Kimball being forced off her medications and made to live on the streets by SOF agents, working in conjunction with Jane Castor; and DHS/COT/TPD agents telling her from 3/2022 to 8-19-23, she couldn’t go home because of the false no contact order on her husband, when it knew no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A – – against SOF;
170. Due to Mrs. Kimball being forced off her medications and made to live on the streets by SOF agents working in conjunction with COT/TPD agents telling her she from 3/2022 to 8-19-23, not to go home because of the false no contact order on her husband, when SOF knew no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A, SOF’s liable for any pain and suffering its agents caused Mrs. Kimball, by wrongly making her live on the streets for 1.5 years, due to an illegal no contact order on her husband, not on her;
171. And Mrs. Kimball, due to the no contact order being ONLY on her husband, was legally allowed to continue living at home, when the Plaintiff was the sole owner of the property and technically didn’t have to leave;
Count 5: F.S. 782.07(1) (aggravated manslaughter) a violation by DHS, whose affiliated concert members: Jane Castor; and her local concert of DHS/SOF/COT/TPD agents, were being financially supported by the FRB and the FRB through DHS, which knowingly and intentionally had Jane Castor’s concert keep Mrs. Kimball in need of the bare necessities in order to survive, on the streets of Clearwater, then again in Tampa, then again in Brandon, so SOF could continue prosecuting the Plaintiff for violations of probation, when Mrs. Kimball would keep returning to her house, turning a blind eyes to her suffering from 2-22 to 8/23, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a);(b);&(c) and 112.3173(e)(6); and Sections 1346; 1341; 1343; Chapter 817; and 1513, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A. Title 28, Chapter 190, Section 5001 is applicable – – against SOF;
172. SOF is at least capably negligent in the aggravated manslaughter of Mrs. Kimball, with Andrew Warren, Susan Lopez and Judge Lynn Goudie placed permanently in a prison cells, due to all of them knowing no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 6: The Plaintiff’s False Imprisonment by SOF for 225 Days, a violation under Florida Statute 787.02 – – against SOF;
173. SOF is liable for damages, due to it being a racketeering participant in this matter under the RICO Act, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, liable for the Plaintiff’s False Imprisonment, when it helped wrongly put him in jail three (3) times, when it knew no crime was committed in court case 22-CF-2324-A, but kept wrongly prosecuting him to keep putting him back in jail;
Count 7: Malicious Prosecution of the Plaintiff, by Jane Castor’s local concert – – against SOF;
174. Both DHS; and Jane Castor orchestrated and initiated this illegal matter through COT/TPD; and SOF. So participant SOF is in violation of, but not limited to, under Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155. So SOF’s liable for the Malicious Prosecution of the plaintiff, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 8: Abuse of Process of the Plaintiff, by COT employee Jane Castor’s local concert – – against SOF;
175. Both DHS; and Jane Castor orchestrated and initiated this illegal matter through COT/TPD; and SOF. SOF was working in concert with Jane Castor; DHS/COT/TPD, for the improper purpose of injuring the Plaintiff and his wife physically; emotionally; and monetarily as racketeers against the Plaintiff under Title 18, Chapter 73, Sections 1513(e & f), due to Jane Castor; and COT/TPD being RICO Act participants with DHS/SOF, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 9: Fraud on the Court (F.S. 1540 and Rule 60(b) in federal court) in cases 22-CF-2324-A was committed – – SOF, due to being a participant under the RICO Act, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A – – against SOF;
176. SOF was a concert member involved in the prosecution of the Plaintiff, when Judge Goudie defrauded the Plaintiff herself, and allowed SOF to do the same in her kangaroo court, as if deaf, dumb and blind, violations under, but not limited to, being a racketeering participant under Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 10: Title 18, Chapter 73, Section 1513, an FRB retaliation crime initiated by DHS; and Jane Castor through SOF/COT/TPD (Jane Castor’s local concert) – – against SOF;
177. SOF was working in concert with Jane Castor; and DHS/COT/TPD to commit retaliatory acts for the purpose of physical; emotional; and monetary injuring the Plaintiff and his wife, committed in violation of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A, implemented by the John Rockefeller and his think tank, after the Plaintiff threatened to sue the FRB through John for obtaining his laundered inheritance beginning around 2000;
Count 11: SOF has standing to be sued for agent perpetrated wrongs on all Counts, due to the Law of Agency; Vicarious Liability; Imputation; and Respondeat Superior Doctrines – – against SOF;
178. SOF is liable for any of its employees’ wrongful actions and omissions which caused the Plaintiff and his wife damages, due to Vicarious Liability; Imputation; Respondeat Superior Doctrines and the Law of Agency;
Count 12: Fla. Stat. §838.022(a); (b); (c), under F.S. 895, (private and public scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services, implemented by the FRB and initiated through SOF in cases 22-CF-2324-A; 21-CF-006147-A; 25-CA-564; and 24-CA-7358 and through AHCA – – against SOF;
179. SOF is in violation of both state and federal honest services, committed by any and all of its employees during cases 22-CF-2324-A; 21-CF-006147-A; 25-CA-564; and 24-CA-7358, starting from 2/22, due to it being a racketeering participant under the RICO Act, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 13: F.S. §112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346), (private and public scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services, implemented by the FRB and initiated through SOF in cases 22-CF-2324-A; 21-CF-006147-A; 25-CA-564; and 24-CA-7358 and through AHCA – – against SOF;
180. SOF is in violation of both state and federal honest services, committed by any and all of its employees during cases 22-CF-2324-A; 21-CF-006147-A; 25-CA-564; and 24-CA-7358, due to it being a racketeering participant under the RICO Act, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 14: Title 18, Sections 1341; 1343, under F.S. 895, (private and public scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services, implemented by the FRB and initiated through SOF in cases 22-CF-2324-A; 21-CF-006147-A; 25-CA-564; and 24-CA-7358 and through AHCA – – against SOF;
181. SOF is in violation of both state and federal honest services, committed by any and all of its employees during cases 22-CF-2324-A; 21-CF-006147-A; 25-CA-564; and 24-CA-7358, due to it being a racketeering participant under the RICO Act, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 15: F.S. Chapter 817.155, (private and public scams to defraud Plaintiff and his wife out of honest services, implemented by the FRB and initiated through SOF in cases 22-CF-2324-A; 21-CF-006147-A; 25-CA-564; and 24-CA-7358 and through AHCA – – against SOF;
182. SOF is in violation of both state and federal honest services, committed by any and all of its employees during cases 22-CF-2324-A; 21-CF-006147-A; 25-CA-564; and 24-CA-7358, due to it being a racketeering participant under the RICO Act, violations of, but not limited to, Florida Statutes 838.022(a); (b); (c); 112.3173(e)(6) (same as Title 18, Section 1346); Sections 1341; 1343; and 1513(e & f), under F.S. 895; and Chapter 817.155, when no crime was committed in case 22-CF-2324-A;
Count 16: SOF is 50% liable for TPD’s theft; conversion; and destruction of the Plaintiff and his wife’s properties within their house, under F.S. 771.11(1) & 812.014 – – against SOF;
183. SOF is liable for the theft; conversion; and destruction of Plaintiff and his wife’s properties within their house through TPD, so it now owes the Plaintiff 50% on $60,000. USD, before and during case 22-CF-2324-A (crimes committed on both 2-24-22 & 7-26-23).
Count 17: 4th amendment right violations – – against SOF;
184. FRB/DHS/COT/SOF/ through TPD violated the Plaintiff and his wife’s rights to not have their house searched; property stolen; converted; and damaged during 3 illegal TPD searches; and a fourth (4) illegal one by federal marshals after Judge Lynn Goudie issued a false warrant for the Plaintiff’s arrest, because he supposedly knew his wife was around the corner at the northern intersection from his home address, when he was driving his car down his block. Marshals used his illegally obtained house keys from within his pocket for 45 minutes, to go to his house and search it, permanently keeping his wallet with its full contents, possibly for SOF/COT/TPD to go through, but it was never to be seen by the Plaintiff again;
185. Due to Jane Castor; FRB/SOF/COT/TPD, an illegal concert, the Plaintiff was illegally arrested on: 2-24-22; and again by federal marshals on the street a few months later, complements of criminal minded Lynn Goudie; and a third time on 7-26-23;
186. FRB/SOF/COT/TPD; and Jane Castor, illegally imprisoned the Plaintiff for 225 days in total;
187. Jane Castor; and FRB/DHS/SOF/COT/TPD agents illegally removed Mrs. Kimball from her home, or made her leave it, each time they found her at home, keeping her on the streets to be foreseeably injured or killed.
Relief sought:
188. Money amounts the Plaintiff’s seeking from Defendant SOF in this complaint for personal injuries:
A. Economic damages amount to roughly $400,000. USD for Mrs. Kimball’s lost SSI income from age 41 to 75 (34 years’ worth);
B. 50% shared expense by SOF; and TPD, in $60,000. USD owed, for TPD stealing and damaging $20,000. USD of the Plaintiff and his wife’s properties within their home, during two (2) illegal TPD searches, implemented on 2-24-22 & 7-26-23, violations under F.S. §772.11 (1), 5 year statute of limitations, see court documents Appendix B. COT has now been given 30 days to pay the Plaintiff $30,000. USD. (Appendix B & court case 22-CF-2324-A) (Attorney Joseph Davis, the Plaintiff’s former attorney, is a witness to the thefts and damages);
C. 50% shared expense by TPD; and SOF, in TPD’s illegal search of Plaintiff’s house on 7-26-23, due to no search warrant while still being illegally prosecuted by SOF up until 12/2023, costing him $3,500. USD in legal fees from Attorney Joseph Davis – – so $1,750 USD is the amount both SOF and COT owe the Plaintiff;
D. the Plaintiff’s punitive and non-economic amounts for his own personal pain and suffering, along with Mrs. Kimball’s personal injury – – 1.5 years’ of being made to survive on the streets by FRB/DHS/SOF/COT/TPD; and Jane Castor, all non-economic/punitive, intentional/culpable, torts/scams, all committed by FRB contracted/paid agents, total well over $60. million USD, by referencing verdicts on similar federal and state violations.
189. Elements of the Causes of Action – – statutory or duty of care violations:
190. All of the Defendants had a direct, or indirect duty through their contracted/paid agents, not to breach multiple state and federal statutes either capably, but mainly intentionally, injuring the Plaintiff and his wife, compensation now owed to them.
191. Prayer for Relief:
192. The relief sought from all of the Defendants is punitive with compensatory, due to being the defendant in case 22-CF-2324-A and Mrs. Kimball’s husband, and requests attorney’s fee and costs when applicable.
193. Expedited Trial by Jury is asked for.
Affidavit of Verification:
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH
I, Darryl Schneider, being duly sworn, deposes and say: I the Plaintiff in the above entitled action, have read the foregoing complaint and know the contents of it, and say that to the best of my knowledge, its “contents” ARE TRUE and CORRECT.
______________________________________Signature
Subscribed and sworn before me on _____________________to certify which witness signed by my hand and official seal. Driver License# ______________________________________
__________________________________________Name
______________________________________Signature
___________________________Notary Public State of Florida Seal
Certificate of Service:
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was placed into the case file with notification to each Defendant.
Darryl Schneider Plaintiff
_________________________
Signature
10406 N 26 Street
Tampa, FL 33612
813-585-0552
Adverse Parties:
1. David Dawson II
732 Holly Terrace
Brandon, FL 33511-5416
2. TGH
c/o John Couris
5707 Bayshore Blvd.
Tampa, FL 33611
or
1 Tampa General Circle
c/o Risk Management
1 Davis Blvd.
Suite 402
Tampa, FL 33606
813-844-7000
3. City of Tampa
Risk Management
306 East Jackson Street
Suite 4-E
Tampa, FL 33602
813-274-8211
4. State of Florida
Florida Department of Financial Services Division of Risk Management
200 E. Gaines St.
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0338
850-413-3122
Circuit Civil Division of The
13th Judicial Circuit, Tampa,
Florida
Appendix A: Cases 25-CA-564 & 24-CA-7358
Appendix B: Cases 22-CF-2324-A & 21-CF-006147-A
Appendix C: Competency Evaluation
Appendix D: FRB Investments
Appendix E: Films
Appendix F: NCUA & TBFCU
Appendix G: Common Laws
Appendix E: Fraudulent Transfer of Case 25-CA-8096
02-10-25, and
3-12-25
1. David R. Rothschild
Rothschild & Co. Continuation Holdings AG
Name RA000549, Number CHE-103.241.457
Baarerstrasse 95, ZUG 6300, Switzerland, Swiss Confederation
c/o
2. Alexandre G. Rothschild
Rothschild & Co.
1251 Avenue of the Americas
33rd floor
New York, NY 10020
USA
212-403-3500
A. USPS Certified Mail #9589 0710 5270 0561 5430 74
3. Lynn Forester Rothschild
c/o
Council for Inclusive Capitalism Inc.
909 3rd Ave.
Unit 8343
New York City, NY 10150
USA
B. USPS Certified Mail #9589 0710 5270 0561 5430 98
&
Home address:
435 East 52nd Street
#18
New York, NY 10022
FedEx number recorded 772672849290
4. Hannah M. Rothschild
Estate Yard Office
Queen Street
Waddesdon Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom, HP18 0JW
C. USPS Registered Mail # RF 615725705 US
5. Kristalina Georgieva
International Monetary Fund
1900 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20431
202-623-7000
D. USPS Certified Mail # 9589071052701675675651
FedEx number recorded
6. John D. Rockefeller IV
c/o
Rockefeller Brothers Fund
200 Lake Road
Tarry Town, NY 10591
202-291-2445
&
Home address:
2121 Park N.W. Road
Washington, D.C. 20010
202-291-2445
E. USPS Certified Mail # 9589 0710 5270 0561 5431 04
FedEx number recorded 772672906463
7. Sharon Rockefeller
2121 Park N.W. Road
Washington, D.C. 20010
202-291-2445
F. USPS Certified Mail # 9589071052700561543081
FedEx number recorded 772672962577
RE:
1) Pre-suit Demand for $54.724,800 Million USD, Compensation Provided Within 30 Days for Injuries Sustained, Committed By the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) Enterprise, From 3/2021 to Present, or Be Sued for A) Racketeering; B) Wrongful Death; & C) Survival Action Claims,
2) Pre-suit Demand for Defendants’ Records on Every Investment Corporations Partnered With and Owned Outright By Chase Manhattan Investment Holdings, LP.; Chase Manhattan BSP Holdings Corp.; & Rothschild & Co. Continuation Holdings AG., From 1/2000 to Present (Inheritance was FRB Employee Stolen/Invested in Multiple FRB Funds 12 Years Before Mother’s 2012 Murder), and
3) Pre-suit Demand for the Full Names of the Actual/Real Owners of All Three (3) Corporations Cited Above.
David, Alexandre, Lynn, Hannah, Kristalina, Sharon & John:
We spoke many times John in 2020 about your banking enterprise, which includes all the owners of the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB); World Bank (WB); and International Monetary Fund (IMF); its elected and appointed managers, directors, presidents; along with their subordinate RICO perpetrating participants. Enclosed is my 12/2020 letter to you, which should jog your memory of who I am and what RICO predicate acts you ordered committed on me and my wife using your FRB enterprise. Listed below are my family’s many FRB sanctioned court case losses, numbered 1 through 8, which illegally profited the FRB enterprise, through its mixed market, investment corporations. There’re over 10 million of them catering to every type of consumer in every sector of the world. For over 12 years, FRB elected and appointed managers along with their subordinate agents, have intentionally injured me and my family physically, monetarily and emotionally, in violation of our state and federal constitution rights, to profit the FRB enterprise in violation of the RICO Act. RICO claims survive the death of parties injured because it’s remedial and not penal in nature. United States v. Private Sanitation Indus. Ass’n of Nassau/Suffolk, Inc., 914 F. So heirs can sue RICO participants for racketeering while having concurrently been involved in murdering their relatives, without a time limit. G. INST. 4.112–13 (F. de Zulueta trans., 1946) (addressing survival); id. at 6.189–215 (discussing the scope of delicts for multiple damages); Title 18, Chapter 232, Section 3663; and United States v. Payne, 591 F. 3d 46, 57–59 (2d Cir. 2010).
John, all the FRB owners require their elected and appointed officials to have their subordinate agents (third party hirelings) within judicial and executive branches of government, officially launder and misappropriate consumers’ stolen moneys back to their much needed agent thieves (ATs), thus permitting them to continue saving, spending or investing the loot within the fully owned and controlled FRB world economy, where FRB mixed market, investment corporations, provide goods and services to every type of consumer, in every type of industry, in every sector under the sun, using supercomputer enhanced FRB Point-of-Sale (POS) Systems to acquire and transfer hot spoils instantly within FRB banking/investment networks. VERY SLICK! And if any injured consumer, no pigeon, objects to having been plucked by filing a lawsuit against the agent thief (AT), their defense attorney will immediately find out if there’s a prior court case ruling anywhere in any circuit, where a judge defrauded the plaintiff as either state governor, or federal circuit director, sanctioned agency policy! If so, they’ll be obligated as an officer of the court to intentionally commit the government, no enterprise, function of blatantly filing a false dismissal motion as an accomplice to the presiding judge’s conspiracy to defraud the plaintiff (highly illegal in federal court). Then when the presiding judge officially grants and files his or her bogus ruling, he or she not only commits honest services fraud (HSF) under Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1346, but mail (interstate carrier) and/or wire (interstate Internet) fraud, respectively violations under Title 18, Chapter 63, Sections 1341 & 1343. If any FRB paid judge refuses to do this much for their FRB enterprise, he or she will be demoted and eventually replaced by the governor or circuit director for a prior consumer complaint made. 10s of thousands of consumer complaints are filed yearly on corrupt attorneys and judges, which state governors and federal circuit directors, cover-up as standard agency policy! Bogus/void agent rulings are officially filed to keep consumers’ stolen, laundered, or misappropriated moneys owed, permanently within FRB circulation. The FRB enterprise is composed of millions of mixed market, investment corporations in every country which manufactures, distributes and sells just about every material, commodity, good and service within every industry and sector on the planet, as it profits from ATs/consumers using its: 1) Sheer global economics; 2) subordinate agents in the field defrauding consumers; and 3) hot intergovernmental transfers; plus 4) multiple agency contracts per agency, used to support all FRB agencies and agents with hot support funding, some used as agent bribes. And in return, agencies submit hot FRB proceed payments to FRB banks, all within the FRB enterprise’s owned and controlled global economy. The FRB enterprise is a BEAST of an illegal monopoly in violation of FTC regulations, for preventing some of its competitors from operating in the black, by price fixing, dividing markets and rigging bids. Thus it hinders both open (business/citizen-private) and closed (government-public) worldwide markets from operating freely. How quickly the FRB enterprise obtains agent laundered or misappropriated spoils, depends on what the ATs do with the loot after illegal rulings are concluded, but 95% of the time, they’re already being used by the FRB enterprise due to: A) Immediate FRB merchant processing of ATs’ illegal proceeds deposited within FRB circulation and B) FRB fractional-reserve loaning by FRB bank transfers. Both FRB deposits and transfers are immediately, due to linked FRB supercomputer banking/investment networks, for speed and accuracy.
Consequently, not much sum sufficient proof is needed to substantiate the fact that all FRB owners/principal-masters knowingly fund all their NCUA/FDIC administrators; agent cops; and agent judges in America as 1) benefactors (founders of the feast), by providing hot intergovernmental transfers and hot agency contract funding. All agencies in America obtain multiple types of hot FRB funding to pay for: Local/state and federal infrastructure maintenance costs; salaries and perks for its banking administrators; its law enforcement agents (both executive branches); plus its judicial agents (judiciary branch), all operating out of every sector of America. And in return, the FRB principal-masters knowingly obtain, keep and use hot agency proceed payments as 2) beneficiaries who collect their recycled loot within their fully owned and invested in worldwide global economy which routes all stolen spoils home again and again, because they’re invested in, and illegally control, EVERYTHING IN IT! EXTREMELY SLICK!
When NCUA/FDIC administrators, along with state and federal courthouse judges, launder or misappropriate consumers’ stolen moneys to be permanently kept within FRB circulation, which also makes some consumers have to spend more of their moneys due to repurchases of the same goods and services owed to them by ATs, 95% of the initial banking transactions are electronically processed immediately by the FRB enterprise due to the sheer number of FRB mixed market, investment corporations (banks included), being in the millions per country! So if ATs 1) save the loot in bank accounts, it most likely will be within FRB branch banks, with the FRB enterprise able to use from 85% to 90% of the full amount immediately in loan moneys, with the transactions being illegal because the loaned moneys are hot, and the FRB enterprise was already constructively notified of this through one of its owners, that being you John! If the ATs 2) spend the loot in any market place, the full amount will most likely be acquired by the FRB enterprise through its multitude of investment corporations, with the transactions being illegal because the spent moneys are hot, and the FRB enterprise was already constructively notified of this through one of its owners, that being you John! If ATs 3) invest the loot, it most likely will be through an FRB enterprise investment service, so the FRB enterprise will be profiting itself and its agent thief (AT) clients, with the transactions being illegal because the invested moneys are hot, and the FRB enterprise was already constructively notified of this through one of its owners, that being you John! And if some ATs 4) save the loot in mattresses, the FRB enterprise will be acquiring nothing, but it’s still in violation of the RICO Act for: Its FRB owners being both the benefactors and beneficiaries of agency scams committed on consumers by: A) providing all agencies and agents (agent cops, agent judges and NCUA/FDIC agents) with support funding in the form of: Agent accommodations; agent salaries; and agent perks (bribes), with agents in return aiding and abetting in physical and monetary scams committed on consumers, while breaching their fiduciary duties to them; B) the FRB knowingly acquiring stolen spoils by accepting hot contract proceeds from agencies; C) the FRB knowingly acquiring ATs’ stolen federal income and business tax moneys, initially provided to, respectively the IRS and state revenue departments, which the FRB owners respectively provide merchant processing services to for collecting hot moneys; D) the FRB turning a blind eye in stopping their agents from racketeering; by E) the FRB owners continuing to participate in agent racketeering, by providing agent support after being constructively notified of agents’ participation in consumer scams which profits their FRB enterprise; F) without the FRB enterprise divesting a penny of the loot.
The FRB enterprise knowingly and intentionally provides hot intergovernmental transfers to every state governor and appointed director/president in America, who in turn uses some of the hot moneys as support payments on: 1) infrastructure maintenance costs for housing enterprise members; 2) salaries and perks for state and federal enterprise judicial agents; and 3) salaries and perk for city, county, state and federal enterprise agent cops operating as public safety officers throughout the country who A) physically injure consumers while also committing B) monetary laundering scams on them. So local/state agency personnel are paid their salaries and perks (bribes) using: C) Hot intergovernmental transfers from FRB to state governors, and from state to local governments when needed (intrastate transfers); along with D) local/state hot FRB commercial banking contract moneys, which are also provided to other local agencies as intrastate transfers. E) Consumers’ stolen moneys go into state revenue coffers, obtained from ATs as hot payments on: City/county property/water assessment taxes; city/county water, sewer, garbage; local/state courthouse fees, costs and fines; state revenue sales taxes; and state gross receipt sales taxes. FRB managing agents are: Elected governors, sheriffs, mayors, city council members, county commissioners; appointed federal agency directors/presidents, who all implement, manage and oversee FRB sting operations within their jurisdictions. FRB subordinate agents who commit the sting operations are: Cops, but mainly judges and NCUA/FDIC administrators, who knowingly commit the same exact, routinely used, HSF scam on consumers to intentionally profit their FRB enterprise. Consequently, FRB subordinate agents working in the field, make their entire den of thieves liable for compensation owed to their victims, especially all the FRB principal-masters within the FRB, WB and IMF!
John, many co-conspiring ATs were illegally authorized by many of your FRB subordinate agents, to illegally save or parlay my family’s stolen and owed moneys, specifically from 3/2021 to present, within the FRB world economy, on either: State sales taxes; state gross receipt sales taxes; city/county property/water assessment taxes; city/county water, sewer and garbage payments; local/state courthouse fees, fines, costs (public forums); and FRB goods and services provided by FRB mixed market, investment corporations, with stolen state tax revenues collected (both private and public forums). Taxes first go to state revenue coffers (public forums), then onto all local/state municipals (public forums) to pay FRB contract proceeds: 1) FRB accruing interest payments; 2) bond dividend payments; 3) financial management fees; and 4) investment service fees. Again, the total number of FRB mixed market, investment corporations worldwide which ATs either save, or transfer (trade or invest) consumers’ stolen moneys within for equity or profit, is so VAST (in the millions per country), that they’re ALMOST ALWAYS initially deposited into FRB bank accounts. So stolen moneys are immediately available for FRB enterprise use about 95% of the time, after ATs either deposit or transfer stolen spoils within the FRB world economy, using FRB supercomputer banking systems/networks. Proving where stolen moneys go after this point, isn’t nesseccary when all requirements for RICO cause of action claims against any FRB principal-master, have already been met! Under RICO, all the FRB principal-masters are considered the same entities as their enterprise and divisions/corporations/structures. The FRB enterprise includes all foreign FRB principal-master colleagues within both the WB and IMF. The FRB enterprise consists of millions of structures and dozens of principal-masters/owners, all located throughout the world, but only one (1) enterprise.
All the FRB masters easily, frequently and intentionally cause all types of consumers both physical and monetary injuries for profit and gain due to: A) Being master economists and principal racketeers, operating their enterprise from within their multitude of mixed market, investment corporations, who understand the value of owning and controlling all the world’s natural resources, INCLUDING HUMANS, along with all the world’s manufacturing, distributing and retail sales networks, for providing FRB goods and services to every industry operating out of every sector in the world when needed by FRB victims, after sustaining FRB injuries; B) the FRB masters and their managers controlling the amount consumers are monetary and physical injured by their agents, thus affecting the amount of hot profits within its investment portfolio. How badly consumers are injured determines how much the FRB masters profit; and C) the FRB monetarily funding all local/state and federal agencies to support all elected and appointed FRB managers, directors, presidents, along with their subordinate agents breaching their fiduciary duties owed to consumers by injuring them (physically & monetarily) at their discretion from within commerce based agencies/forums as required/sanctioned agency policy (illegal)! How many local sheriffs working out of populated counties, live in multimillion dollar homes with millions USD stashed, after receiving huge federal perks from the FRB, DEA, ATF and Homeland Security (HS), when they’re only supposedly paid civil servant salaries? The answer is every one of them, because they do such an excellent job of taking the bankers’ cattle to market (cattle drives)!
Elected and appointed FRB managing agents implement, protect and enforce the FRB enterprise’s defrauding scheme as standard agency policy, by using both extortion (threat of being fired or losing one’s bar license) or coercion/bribery (salaries & perks) tactics, to obtain results from every subordinate agent operating in the field. If the FRB masters can have their subordinate agents working within law enforcement, NCUA/FDIC and courthouses, launder or steal consumers’ moneys in excess of their monthly spending allowance, they can make them spend their savings too within the FRB world economy. In 3/2020, I filed multiple causes of action under the RICO Act within the 10 year statute of limitations on the owners of the corporations listed below for their agents having racketeered continuously with local FRB judicial agents as one (1) enterprise, with the purpose of keeping moneys owed to me and my wife permanently in FRB CIRCULATION. I sued these owners because 1) they were rich enough to pay me and my wife what they owed us without declaring bankruptcy, and because 2) I hadn’t yet figured out who else was profiting from our stolen moneys, due to illegal FRB agent involvement in AT CONVERSION/INTERFERENCE FRAUD SCAMS, where FRB agents were profiting UNKNOWN ATs, until I followed our stolen moneys from the ATs to the FRB, NOW AN ENTERPRISE! I wanted to find out WHY so many state/federal judicial agents had defrauded us and other plaintiffs to illegally profit UNKNOWN ATs. What I found was a HIGHLY profitable, yet HIGHLY ILLEGAL, interconnected relationship between the FRB and its agents, along with the ones between the FRB and its ATs/vendors, both groups receiving perks/bribes from the FRB, with consumers’ stolen moneys knowingly being transferred in CIRCLES to every participant over and over again! Even the relationships between agents and unknown ATs/vendors, were interconnected because the FRB was supporting both groups/gangs, with the paid FRB agents, blatantly profiting the unknown ATs/vendors, by officially facilitating/finalizing their CONVERSION/INTERFERENCE FRAUD SCAMS, but ultimately profiting the FRB a WHOLE LOT MORE THAN THE ATS!!!! 1) The ATs/vendors get to save, spend or invest 100% of the money owed to consumers, within the FRB global economy, and 2) the FRB already made at least 300% profit off the sale of each good sold to each AT/vendor during each CONVERSION SCAM. Then with consumers repurchasing the items or services not received, the FRB gets to make at least another 300% profit off the sale of any replacement goods sold.
This makes the FRB principal-masters the proximate cause of the two (2) step interconnected conversion fraud scams which first profits the ATs/vendors (fences), then it EXPONENTIALLY PROFITS the FRB enterprise (buyers) using its agents to finish injuring consumers, only after complaints are officially filed. If FRB agents didn’t scam consumers, the FRB enterprise wouldn’t be able to be sued through its FRB owners for racketeering! And there wouldn’t have been any mentally deranged reasoning on your part John, to have believed it was a good idea to falsely incarcerated me while MURDERING MY WIFE!!!!
1. Federal court case 20-CV-78, valued at $4.1 million USD, with the racketeering AT owners and their agents working out of the following corporations:
A. Willow Bay, owner of ABC, Inc. (ABC), monetary damages from all court related RICO/antitrust injuries from 6-21-18 to 3/2020,
B. Donald Trump (DT), monetary damages from all court related RICO/antitrust injuries from 5-16-18 to 4/2020 and a Title 18, Chapter 216, Section 3333(a)(1) & (2) investigation into the Trump Administration (TA) and its affiliated Department of Justice (DOJ), U.S. Supreme Court (USSC) & Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),
C. CNA Insurance Company (CNA), monetary damages starting from case 14-CA-10278 related RICO/antitrust injuries on 2-6-15 to 3/2020,
D. Florida Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company (FLMIC), monetary damages starting from case 14-CA-12257 related RICO/antitrust injuries on 1-24-18 to 3/2020,
E. Axis Insurance (AI), monetary damages starting from case 17-CA-4051 related RICO/antitrust injuries on 1-16-18 to 3/2020,
F. Chart Industries Inc. (CI), monetary damages starting from case 17-CC-403 related RICO/antitrust injuries on 2-7-18 to 3/2020,
G. Free Methodist Church of North America (FMCNA), monetary damages to Mr. Schneider starting from case 17-CA-6219 related RICO/antitrust injuries on 5-25-19 & to Mrs. Kimball on 10-28-19 to 3/2020,
H. Agency for Community Treatment Services (ACTS), monetary damages to Mr. Schneider starting from case 17-CA-6219 related RICO/antitrust injuries on 8-23-18 & to Mrs. Kimball on 10-28-19 to 3/2020.
2. In the beginning of 2020 John, we talked about my mother’s murder being covered up by FRB agents (local sheriff and chief judge). Multiple local FRB trial judges had been ordered by their chief judge to misappropriate (steal) my inheritance to continue profiting the FRB enterprise through my mother’s murderers (ATs)! Then in 2021, I and my wife’s moneys owed to us by ATs, were both laundered and misappropriated by your federal judicial agent, Jon Levy, on 3/2021, case 20-CV-78. This case was against ATs who owed us compensation beginning in 7/2012 for conversion/interference scams, but had been profited from local FRB judicial agents, committing HSF along with mail/wire frauds. The illegal dismissal of this case cost my family $4.1 million USD! Unless these ATs were stashing their spoils inside mattresses forever, all the moneys owed to us were completely used/depleted by your enterprise John, during and after Jon Levy’s bogus ruling!
3. After 3/2021, another FRB continuation of damages occurred during my local case 21-CC-019331 (property damages) worth a mere $2,300 USD, but resulted in the illegal dismissal of my related local case 21-CA-001798 (physical damages), worth another $190,000 USD.
4. In late 2021, another FRB continuation of damages occurred, this time it was implemented by you John, using FRB enterprise agents to commit RETALIATORY ACTS against me and my wife, in violation of Title 18, Chapter 73, Section 1513 (e & f), similar to violations committed under the Whistleblower Act, by deliberately injuring us in violation of our 4th, 5th, Xth and 14th federal constitutional rights. It was initially committed on us using HS, a federal agency the FRB enterprise funds/bribes through its appointed director. Since the FRB masters OWN AND CONTROL this bankrupted country, without it ever really having had any independent democratic oversight to protect consumers’ rights, the FRB enterprise has recently decided to step up its consumer based sting operations and finally start running this country like a real fascist dictatorship, by increasing its hot monetary funding/bribes going to all of its managers, directors, presidents and subordinate agents, to increase their fleecing consumers to the bone marrow for increased FRB proceeds! This is why most managing FRB agents live in million dollar homes, supposedly only earning public servant wages! I have all the evidence needed John, to ABSOLUTELY PROVE all the FRB masters knowingly and intentionally participate with FRB agent accomplices in defrauding consumers, violations of both state and federal constitutional laws, using a well-known and well-patterned defrauding scheme within two (2) different types of commerce based forums, ALL DAY LONG! I believe, no I know, you implemented your revenge on me John through Barack Obama, who in turn gave the order for my being HIT to the director of HS, and when this agency couldn’t find anything it could legally arrest me on after monitoring my computer for months, it used local lesbian mayor, Jane Castor to implement and manage your sting operation on me and my wife, using her local cops operating in the 1) correct jurisdiction to illegally violate me on the charge you wanted; and to 2) make by wife live on the streets to be agent murdered! How much was Jane perk paid indirectly through HS to be your FRIEND John? Being as ruthlessly as hell, and completely loyal to whoever’s paying her perks, makes Jane your kind of nutter.
This resulted in YOUR bogus criminal charge John, case 22-CF-002324-A, being filed on me through Jane’s office. No official, even in a queer and delusional state of mind, would’ve filed this complaint on their own. You made me spend 225 days in jail with my wife unable to come home after being illegally detained for 3 weeks. Then my wife was ordered not to go home and to live on the streets by weirdo Jane and her accomplices working out of other local agencies as fronts for your FRB enterprise. Your enterprise’s involvement in this matter resulted in my false incarcerated while my wife was intentionally chased into a crosswalk, when she had the right-of-way, to be intentionally hit by a moving car on 8-19-23, at 3:40am, as one (1) of your agent cops from an unknown law enforcement agency, sat in the passenger seat of a police cruiser and filmed the event with his handheld camera for you to watch at your leisure! Then my wife was taken to an FRB funded hospital (Tampa General Hospital (TGH)) where you had her FINISHED OFF JOHN! This same hospital, owned by John Couris, after 14 months of arguing with it, still refuses to give me my wife’s medical records, so I can obtain more details surrounding her murder. Federal case 24-CV-1033, with Judge Steele presiding, was asked by me to assist in local case 24-CA-7358, because a murder was committed and FRB agent Alissa Ellison presiding, refused to order the full video of my wife’s murder, along with her TGH medical records, from opposing parties (The chief judge was constructively notified by USPS certified mail # 9589071052700561543067). This federal case was then illegally transferred by Judge Steele, to the Tampa division (completely different venue) where another federal agent (Judge Jung) had his magistrate illegally deny the complaint, so there’d be no judicial obligation to investigate my wife’s murder (case 24-CV-2626)! WOW! Whenever a consumer’s complaint is officially filed on an FRB owed, or invested in, entity, it’s illegally dismissed by an FRB agent, so there aren’t any FRB monetary losses!
Don’t have your agents try to MURDER me again John, because with the magnitude of evidence I have on your enterprise, already compiled and ready to be disclosed to the world rather quickly and easily, thousands of lawsuits will be filed on you under the RICO Act! Most of this evidence is in my RICO complaint, which any one of my relatives will be filing in my place, should you succeed in having me murdered too John. After it’s filed, your enterprise can have my wife’s medical records released from TGH, an FRB invested in, and profited by, corporation, to me and American/foreign press agents. I for one will be suing a couple FRB enterprise owners for an additional $50 million (a conservative amount owed to me) on: 1) My false incarceration; 2) survival action claim, for the FRB enterprise making my wife live on the streets for 2 years; and a 3) wrongful death claim, for the FRB enterprise murdering my wife! Culpable negligence foreseeably resulting in death, is an aggravated manslaughter violation (FS 782.07(1)).
This is not the proper time or medium to tell you what I think of you John, but I’ll tell you this much: All the FRB masters are like cancerous growths, producing foul and disgusting odors, which should’ve been surgically removed from society and burned to ash decades ago. They’re all habitual lying losers, who never made an honest living selling quality products or services, so they’re method of staying in the black has always been to leach off the rich; steal from the poor; and bribe the greedy; using easy money to entice both officials and consumers into swindling gimmicks which got them their seed money. Any association which bribes greedy and corrupted agents with millions USD each, can get away with scamming consumers out of their valuables. Not much intelligence is needed to do this John, but it’s extremely obvious! Your kind blatantly deals from the bottom of half deck of cards while laughing in their victims’ faces for increased self-esteem. I truly believe all the FRB masters are nothing but sneaky stupid thieves working out of dens of inequity, with demon aliens talking to them from inside their heads. How many are in yours John?
I contacted you John in the beginning of 2020, asking for your help in having my mother’s caregivers indicted for murder, because your bought and paid for president (Donald Trump) refused, but you too refused to help, stating you wouldn’t unless I was your FRIEND! So obtaining a favor from you is only possible, after one is owed by you. It figures you’d want compensation first before remedying the problem your enterprise caused to illegally profit and gain. I then threatened to sue you in the enclosed letter, only because you failed to stop your agents from defrauding me and my family. How many other consumers do you think have the intelligence and nerve to put your enterprise on notice to divest or be sued under RICO? The answer is millions, once informed of the facts in this letter! You should’ve given me back my inheritance when I asked you nicely, but now you’re going to look like a madman thief and murderer! You see, you already murdered my wife, so now I don’t care what else you do Johnny Boy!!!!
How unimaginative you were in having me falsely incarcerated for ironically being my wife’s negligent caregiver, or was it your boy Barack who thought of this lame plan? Murderers!!!! Your charge against me was filed without any material evidence to substantiate any crime having been committed by ANYONE! If your agents had no intention of planting incriminating evidence in our house to arrest me on, like my wife’s dead body, then they had no business executing your deficient plan which made YOU look INVOLVED, SCARED and DEFINITELY DESPERATE! For the past 35 years, FRB subordinate agents have increased the number of U.S. constitutional right violations committed on Americans, so now every consumer is routinely defrauded out of both their freedom and money as standard agency practice by NCUA/FDIC agents; agent cops; and agent judges for increasing FRB enterprise profits and gains. I know you wanted me to know it was you John who both falsely incarcerated me and murdered my wife for that punitive slap across my face. So now here we are, at the point in which all your crimes finally catch up with you at age 88. I bet when you wake up in the morning and look in the mirror, you’re happy, pleased with what you see, and this disturbs me to the point I’m now going to make it my personal priority to see to it your enterprise is legally put out of business.
The next time around, don’t have government agents whose illegal involvement with me can be traced back to you and your enterprise, and just bring over as many family members as you think you’ll need to stop me from obtaining justice, and we’ll have it out amongst ourselves, with some dignity and integrity like real men John. Or just hire some assassins to do your dirty work for you, like your gutless relatives did, when they didn’t quite control every American agency back in the 60s. With the sheer number of related HSFs committed by FRB agents, violations under Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1346, who concurrently commit mail and wire fraud violations under respectively Title 18, Chapter 63, Sections 1341 & 1343, all the FRB masters are UNEQUIVOCALLY on the hook for compensation owed to just about EVERY American, even if they didn’t know their agents were defrauding 10s of millions of consumers per year!
Imputation serves various functions. It creates incentives for principals to choose their agents wisely. See Restatement (Third) of Agency, supra at § 5.03 comment b, at 360. It also encourages principals to supervise their agents and to share information with them. Id. The ultimate purpose behind these rules of imputation, however, is to fairly allocate risks between principals and innocent third parties. As explained in Kansallis Fin. Ltd. v. Fern, 421 Mass. 659, 664-665, 659 N. E. 2d 731 (1996).
Kansallis:
“Standing behind [the] diverse concepts of vicarious liability is a principle that helps to rationalize them. This is the principle that as between two innocent parties — the principal-master and the third party — the principal-master who for his own purposes, places another in a position to do harm to a third party should bear the loss. A principal who requires an agent to transact his business, and can only get that business done if third parties deal with the agent as if with the principal, cannot complain if the innocent third party suffers loss by reason of the agent’s act. Similarly, the master who must put an instrument into his servant’s hands in order to get his business done … must also bear the loss, if the servant causes harm to a stranger in the use of that instrument as the business is transacted.” (Citations omitted.) Merrimack Coll. v. KPMG LLP, 480 Mass. 614, 108 N. E. 3d 430, 438 (2018). An employer’s liability via respondeat superior “arises simply by the operation of law (Kansallis) and is only derivative of the wrongful act of the employee.” Merrimack Coll. v. KPMG LLP, 480 Mass. 614, 108 N. E. 3d 430, 438 (2018) (quoting Elias v. Unisys Corp., 410 Mass. 479, 573 N.E. 2d 946, 948 (1991)).
Principal-masters having consciously shard in the RICO plan, whether or not they directly participated in any of the RICO predicate acts committed, makes them as liable as the their agents who committed the crimes! Supreme Court of the United States in Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 66 S. Ct. 1180, 90 L. Ed. 1489 (1946). This also means that when RICO predicate acts are committed in furtherance of a conspiracy under Title 18, Chapter 96, Section § 1962(d), any member of the enterprise who only consciously shared in either the 1) RICO plan, or 2) the RICO predicate acts committed afterwards, who turned a blind eye to either one and remained an indirect participant once constructively notified, is still liable for damages equal to the principal accomplices who committed the injuries, and can be held liable themselves for compensation under Title 18, Chapter 96, Section § 1962(a owner, b manager or c perpetrator), depending on what their positions were within the enterprise.
Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640 (1946), which held that a defendant could be held liable for a substantive offense committed by a co-conspirator as long as the 1) offense occurred within the course of the conspiracy, was 2) within the scope of the agreement, and 3) could reasonably have been foreseen as a necessary or natural consequence of the unlawful agreement. United States v. Alvarez-Valenzuela, 231 F3d 1198, 1202 (9th Cir. 2000); United States v. Henry, 984 F.3d 1343, 1355-1356 (9th Cir. 2021). Leaders of criminal organizations can be held liable under RICO for crimes they order others to commit, or assisted in committing, in furtherance of the ongoing criminal organization (Title 18, Chapter 96, Section 1962). John, by you and your associate banking syndicate owners all over the world, continuing to racketeer with each other for satisfaction, profits and gains, after just one (1) of its member owners is constructively notified of the crimes his or her agents committed, only turning a blind eye to them and continuing to indirectly participate in obtaining billions USD of stolen spoils each quarter, is EVIDENCE that your worldwide consortium of thieves, ABSOLUTELY has an AGREEMENT among ALL its owners and agents about defrauding consumers, and isn’t ever going to stop, because it enjoys maximizing AT/consumer profits, which can only come from stealing and murdering them!
At least 50% of poor naive courthouse patrons paying for equitable relief to be granted under either state or federal laws by presiding judges, will have some portion of properties owed to them, laundered/misappropriated to ATs’/bankers (claims partially denied). These illegal rulings happen to: 1) permanently keep consumers’ stolen moneys in FRB circulation to be completely assimilated into the FRB enterprise’s worldwide economies; and so 2) consumer victims will have to spend their savings on the same goods and services they already spent their monthly allowance on, thus forcing at least double amounts of their moneys into FRB circulation. This total amount is a staggering 600% to 2000% of pure profits going to the FRB enterprise on repeat purchases. Thus consumers’ stolen moneys are either AT saved, spent or invested 95% of the time within the FRB’s global economy, with even the stolen taxes from AT/consumer purchases of goods being funneled to the FRB enterprise through state revenue coffers, then onto municipals and FRB banks! The FRB enterprise most definitely and absolutely by this time, has acquired, used and depleted all of my laundered/misappropriated moneys owed, from the past 12 years without a statute of limitations, due to it having been involved in implementing two (2) racketeering scams on me and my family, which ABSOLUTELY resulted in two (2) of my family members being murdered as part of the FRB enterprise’s scheme to derive illegal profits from our injuries!!!!
The result of imputation is that the principal bears the legal consequences of the agent’s conduct. Thus if an agent with actual or apparent authority enters into a contract with a third party, the principal will be bound by that contract. See, e.g., Linkage Corp. v. Trustees of Boston Univ., 425 Mass. 1, 4, 17, 679 N. E. 2d 191, cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1015, 118 S. Ct. 599, 139 L. Ed. 2d 488 (1997) (university bound by agreement signed by vice-president where vice-president had apparent authority). And if an agent negligently injures a third party while acting within the scope of their employment, the employer will be held vicariously liable for that negligence. See, e.g., Dias v. Brigham Med. Assocs., Inc., 438 Mass. 317, 323, 780 N. E. 2d 447 (2002) (corporation could be held vicariously liable for alleged medical malpractice of its physician-employee). Merrimack Coll. v. KPMG LLP, 480 Mass. 614, 108 N. E. 3d 430, 438 (2018).
The Master/Agent/Consumer RICO Relationship:
The FRB enterprise has all of its paid local/state elected municipal, managing agents in America, under contract to collect and transfer consumers’ stolen revenues as proceed payments on: 1) Loans; 2) bond purchases; 3) financial management services; and 4) investment services. So remittance payments made from agencies to the FRB owners through their banks, knowingly uses consumers as the source of surety/collateral on FRB agency funding, because consumers’ moneys are FRB required/sanctioned to be agent stolen to pay for this funding. WOW! And WOW! So it’s pretty well understood within the FRB enterprise, consumers are the ones under contract, not agencies, to produce the masters’ ever accruing proceeds on demand, and if consumers object to being browbeaten and robbed, they’re FRB injured even worse, by agents imposing illegal jail sentences on them and murdering their family members, like the FRB enterprise did to me!!!!
An enterprise’s greed, results in racketeering for increased money, control and power. And racketeering results in both physical and monetary injuries to victims, along with their wrongful deaths when maximizing profits. How many billions John have the FRB masters murdered to maximize enterprise profits and gains? If your enterprise intentionally racketeers to profit and gain illegally from injuring consumers, and someone foreseeably dies during a RICO predicate act committed by its agents, you and the other principal-masters within the same enterprise, who weren’t constructively notified of having received and use the stolen fruits of your agents’ labor, are STILL as guilty as your agents under the Respondeat Superior; Vicarious Liability; and Imputation Doctrines, for the murder without a statute of limitations imposed on BOTH it, AND the racketeering committed during the murder! In the 1970s, the FRB enterprise wanted the RICO Act implemented into law to rid itself of its mobster competition. So now that the FRB owners operate their sting operations from within every consumer based forum, located within every sector of America, without any interference, by being the only governing bodies of both the economy and government agencies, your MASSIVE MONOPOLY is on the hook for everything committed in violation of both state and federal laws while its agents racketeer, including murder john! The statute of limitations for committing a murder, or aiding and abetting one after the fact by covering it up (respectively under Title 18, Chapter 95, Section 1959 & Title 18, Chapter 1, Section 3), is tolled indefinitely. Just how many FRB murders have you personally overseen John, and who were the victims besides my wife?
Millions of consumers already know who the FRB OWNERS are. They also know that ATs officially got away with having STOLEN THEIR MONEYS due to crooked GOVERNMENT AGENTS at the NCUA/FDIC and/or local COURTHOUSES having illegally APPROVED their losses while laughing at them. All that’s missing is for your picked to the bone CATTLE, to finally make the MENTAL CONNECTION that it was a QUASI-GOVERNMENT, FRB LAUNDROMAT SCAM, to allow ATs to steal their moneys, with the FRB AGENTS having authorized the loot to be AT PARLAYED within the FRB GLOBAL MONOPOLY, where FRB ENTERPRISE profits are at 300% to 1000% (averaging 500%) by TRADING WORTHLESS CRAP to ATs, with FRB ENTERPRISE profits averaging between 600% to 2000%, when consumer victims have to make repurchases of what they already paid for, with even their tax dollars being funneled into ITS OPEN ARMS, and your enterprise is SO DONE John!!!! By looking at the massive amounts of related and patterned HSFs committed by your multitude of subordinate agents, working harder than ever now days to benefit your enterprise, by causing consumers both physical and monetary injuries, especially during my 22-CF-002324-A & 20-CV-78 court cases, with you and your enterprising colleagues illegally profiting from their ATs; subordinate agents; and mixed market, investment corporations, makes your enterprise, ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY, liable for every one of its victims’ monetary losses along with my wife’s murder! Racketeering resulting in an agent being culpably negligent in someone’s death (the knowledge of death possibly occurring), makes every one of the FRB owners also guilty of aggravated manslaughter. But my wife’s death wasn’t just a foreseeable conclusion during a racketeering conspiracy, but was the result of a conspiracy to murder both of us as part of YOUR retaliatory plan using YOUR FRB enterprise John. You tried to murder me and my wife using FRB enterprise agents John! This makes YOU, YOUR AGENTS AND YOUR COLLEAGUES also guilty of intentionally murdering my wife, because murdering consumers to maximize benefits, is what all the FRB owners routinely do for a living! You should’ve hired assassins John, then we’d BOTH be dead!
5. On 7/2023, another FRB continuation of damages occurred causing me to be monetarily injured when Mayor Jane Castor’s dirty corrupted cops, kicked open my family’s front door WITHOUT a search warrant and planted an illegal drug and ammunition inside our house, so they could falsely incarcerate me for another 4.5 months, keeping my wife on the streets long enough to murder her!!!! I and my attorney have the film which proves Jane Castor’s cops, staged evidence inside my house. This evidence allowed my false charges to be dismissed, but only after the FRB enterprise murdered my wife!!!! Your subordinate agents MURDERED my wife John, after they damaged/stole $20,000 USD of our properties from inside our house for spite, some of which cannot be replaced!
6. On 5/2024, another FRB continuation of damages occurred, causing me to once again be monetarily injured when a bogus NCUA ruling, supposedly legally allowing one of your enterprise’s investment corporations, MasterCard (Deutsche banking syndicate), NOT to reverse my 3 banking transactions worth $4,500 USD. When consumers file DISPUTE CLAIMS with the NCUA/FDIC, it commits HSFs concurrently with mail/wire frauds, stating in writing that the complaints received were supposedly filed as FRAUD CLAIMS, but when you correct either one of these agencies, by constructively notifying one of its presidents (Todd Harper) as I did, claims are still DISMISSED ANYWAY! It’s VERY OBVIOUS that banking administrators blatantly defraud consumers, so the FRB enterprise can profit from private affiliate unions; banks; and FRB credit card companies, by ATs being illegally allowed to keep stolen proceeds already in FRB circulation, until they’re exhausted! The only reason for SO MANY officials (millions) blatantly breaking the law, is because they’re being bribed to do so by their superiors, or be terminated and ostracized from ever working in their professions again. Correct? ABSOLUTLY!!!!
7. On 1-23-25, another FRB continuation of damages occurred, causing me to once again be monetarily injured when a bogus verbal ruling made by Judge Alissa Ellison, local case 24-CA-7358, cost me a medical malpractice lawsuit against FRB funded TGH, reasonably worth $7 million USD. After intentionally dragging her feet for 4 months, Alissa Ellison refused to order the records requested in a Pure Bill of Discovery, stating on 1-23-25, she wasn’t going to order my wife’s medical records for me (spoliation of evidence), because the applicable Florida statute clearly states I’m not allowed to obtain them. WOW! THIS WAS A HUGE LIE! So who was behind it???? Currently Florida Statute 395.3025(1) states – – If a personal representative has NOT been appointed, then “the next of kin of the decedent” is ALLOWED to obtain the decedent’s medical records!!!! So this was CLEARLY another FRB agent, abuse of discretion committed on me, that resulted in my having to constructively notify the FRB chief judge, informing him that another FRB paid/bribed agent had committed a murder cover-up, so the FRB enterprise could keep/transfer/use/deplete more FRB agent misappropriated moneys owed to me, this time through its funded TGH corporation, but he only turn a blind eye and remained a silent participant in the fraud! TGH’s neurosurgeon was off the weekend my wife was transported there, so 1) she shouldn’t have been transported there by FRB paid, county EMTs and 2) FRB funded TGH, should’ve immediately transported her to another hospital to perform the needed surgery using its helicopter! The FRB enterprise funds TGH through the governor’s office (Medicaid), the University of South Florida (USF) and through federal Medicare, with TGH under contract to trade for many FRB goods and services! No doubt Judge Ellison was A) illegally covering up the FRB murder of my wife, by NOT first ordering her medical records to be used in investigating it, because she already believed an FRB paid/bribed division of law enforcement was involved in her murder (The murder video was already in the case file); and to B) keep FRB funds in TGH circulation by illegally denying me the evidence needed to sue TGH for medical malpractice within the time limit. My injures due to pain and suffering against TGH are reasonable worth $7 million USD as a very sound medical malpractice claim, not to be confused with a combination of wrongful death and survivor action claims, reasonably worth $50 million USD filed against the FRB enterprise! The main point is, FRB judicial agents Alissa Ellison and Chris Sabella, along with their attorney accomplices, aided and abetted their FRB enterprise in committing a RICO Act violation under the HSF statute, to permanently keep FRB enterprise moneys owed to me, within TGH as one of its funded/investment corporations!
8. Another FRB continuation of damages occurred, causing me to once again be monetarily injured when my wife age 41, died on 8-21-23 (3.5 days later) due to a head injury which went UNATTENDED TO by FRB funded TGH!!!! This caused my wife to lose U.S. social security benefits. If she had lived, and she was extremely healthy, she would’ve reasonably lived to at least age 75. So 34 years left to live, at $12,000 USD per year income (A sound estimate on both years lived and income), is $408,000 USD in FRB derived savings owed to me, her next of kin, who’s allowed to sue the FRB enterprise under the RICO Act in her place. A physical injury can be caused by an HSF, and it can equate to FRB derived profits, committed as a RICO violation under Title 18, Chapter 96, Section 1961(1) (A – G), which includes a retaliatory act under Title 18 U.S.C., Chapter 73, § 1513(e & f). My wife’s FRB implemented murder, profited the FRB through one of its funded agencies (social security), by not having to dispense her SSI benefits each month, a steady and permanent source of income to her, thus her benefits are now profiting the FRB in savings, due to it having racketeered/murdered. There’s a time limit for filing wrongful death & survival action claims, but not on suing under RICO for monetary losses when a murder was involved. G. INST. 4.112–13 (F. de Zulueta trans., 1946) (addressing survival); id. at 6.189–215 (discussing the scope of delicts for multiple damages); Title 18, Chapter 232, Section 3663; and United States v. Payne, 591 F. 3d 46, 57–59 (2d Cir. 2010).
All of my court cases from 2012 to present, were illegally dismissed by FRB paid judicial agents when jury trials were demanded, who used very obvious wrong matters of fact and/or law, while blatantly laughing in my face, as if they wanted me to know I was being intentionally defrauded and not to foolishly waste my time ever filing anther lawsuit again. Common law rulings and determinations have been made substantiating a judge’s order to be void when this happens. Qualified immunity does not protect officials who are plainly incompetent, or knowingly violate the law.” Malley v. Briggs, 475 U.S. 335 (1986). Where there were either errors of law, or clearly erroneous factual findings not within the range of permissible judicial decisions, abuses of discretion were committed (Rabkin v. Oregon Health Sciences Univ., 350 F. 3d 967, 977 (9th Cir. 2003); Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a)(6); and United States v. Cazares, 121 F. 3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 1997). Thus common law findings rule out a onetime (1) judicial error, or a onetime (1) personnel defrauding of disliked party by one (1) judge due to spite. Any co-conspirator with deep enough pockets who participated under Section § 1962(d) (Pinkerton Liability Doctrine for RICO criminal matters), and under Section § 1962(a owners, b managers or c perpetrators), is open game for being sued in federal court under the RICO Act to obtain triple the compensation owed. When FRB contracted/salaried/perk/bribed service based government agents within the NCUA/FDIC, law enforcement and courthouses along with their attorney accomplices, blatantly defraud the same consumer two (2) or more times, a breach of fiduciary duties has occurred called HSFs, amounting to a RICO violation.
Consequently when two (2) or more judges apply the wrong law and/or fact a total of two (2) or more times to illegally dismiss the same, or two different parties’ court cases, resulting in both parties being defrauded to benefit the same enterprise, especially when a judicial manager/supervisor was also constructively notified, but turned a blind eye, any reasonable person wouldn’t believe multiple judges somehow became incompetent and in need of caregivers, but were sanctioned to defraud both parties to benefit the same enterprise, especially when both judges’ superiors (chief judges) and an FRB principal-master were constructively notified of the substantive due process right violations (civil right violations under both state and federal constitutions), but turned blind eyes when asked to stop the racketeering from continuing, only remaining participants. John, you were constructively notified in 12/2020, and again today, of this type of racketeering scam being used to profit you and your enterprise! Will your enterprise finally divest what it owes me, or be sued by many?
The total money owed to me before RICO claims are filed is $4,724,800 USD. After 30 days, this amount goes to $14,174,400 USD when the lawsuit’s filed. My murdered wife, who I miss every hour, can never be replaced, nor my being adequately compensated for this type of lose! My false incarceration, along with her wrongful death and survival action claims, are reasonably worth $50,000,000 USD. John, your enterprise currently owes me $54,724,800 USD. This money means nothing to me. I hope I’m not paid, so I can watch thousands of victims whose relatives your enterprise defrauded to death all over America, file RICO lawsuits on the FRB enterprise to put it out of business!!!!
John, you’ve been a pain in my back, side, head and neck for the past 2 years, responsible for decades under the Respondeat Superior; Vicarious Liability; and Imputation Doctrines as the head FRB benefactor/beneficiary who implements consumer defrauding schemes on Americans using your subordinate agents, which all the FRB principal-masters knowingly profit from! All FRB agents within America receive their office accommodations; positions; salaries; perks; and considerations for the purpose of injuring consumers; required to do so by their superiors as a 21st century, customary practice!
The FRB enterprise has funding and management/investment service contracts in place with all American municipals! “What we do is help publicly funded entities of all sizes manage their finances to run more efficiently, so they can allocate resources to better serve their communities.” And “Chase accepts government Deposits from Coast to Coast.” These are exactly what your ads state John. So this confirms the FRB enterprise, which includes all your colleagues abroad, have blatantly open ended contracts with American agencies through at least your banking syndicate, operating within the same enterprise, to obtain never ending flows of consumers’ illegally obtained properties. Yes illegal! Do elected FRB managers have the right to knowingly use consumers’ stolen moneys (principles & taxes), in violation of both state and federal constitutional laws, just because ATs/bankers were OFFICIALLY approved by the NCUA/FDIC and judicial agents to continue using stolen moneys by placing official SEALS on bogus/void rulings? Absolutely not! Do the principal-masters of the FRB, WB and IMF, who OWN America, have the right to operate above its laws by using consumers’ stolen properties as forfeiture/arrear/repayments on the 1933 American bankruptcy bailout? WOW!!!! Very sneaky, but still stupid illegal! Until the U.S. Constitution is formally voided, you don’t have the right to use citizens’ stolen money for anything John! Even kings had to abide by the rules. How history repeats itself:
Centuries ago, justice was an important source of income for kings. Most of the English kings took a genuine interest in justice, but there was no getting away from its value as a SOURCE OF REVENUE. So King John of England would accept offers from lords (the wealthy) who wanted to make sure he took their view of what justice was. But your enterprise, Banker John of Ohio, takes in a hell of a lot more illegal moneys than it would from court case bribes. 1) The FRB enterprise takes in an average of 500% profit on all goods purchased by ATs using consumers’ stolen money, with most defrauded consumers having to make repurchases, which doubles the FRB enterprise’s profits to about 1000%; and 2) 100% of moneys owed to consumers that are agent misappropriated, due to interference type torts, profits the FRB enterprise by this same amount! In my court case 20-CV-78, the amount FRB agent Jon Levy stole from my family was $4.1 million USD! This was 100% of the money owed to us by the ATs, which were already being used within the FRB global economy during and after our being judicially scammed! I was judicial agent scammed, 50 times over 12 years, and will have NO PROBLEM proving the FRB enterprise both A) knowingly initiated the frauds and B) knowingly obtained all my stolen moneys!!!!
So your enterprise John, really turns about $80 cents per USD of hot AT transfers, into PURE (500%) profits by trading SUBPAR goods and services offered at PREMIUM PRICES within your global monopoly for good LOOT, and most ATs have no idea they’re part of your enterprise. EXTRAORDINARILY SLICK!
The principle of “Rule of Law” asserts that no one, including kings or those in positions of power, is above the law. This principle aim was to ensure that everyone is subject to the same set of laws and that no one is immune from the consequences of their actions. Magna Carta was a political settlement between King John and his barons. The barons, who forced it on John, stopped him from taking bribes from the rich to illegally mediate court cases in secret! In those days, either court case party (defendant or plaintiff) was defrauded out of rightfully/legally winning due to the king’s paid/bribed judicial agents committing HSFs. The king ONLY received the bribes, with either party receiving the judicially laundered/stolen moneys! Back then, barons were in the same position as elected U.S. congressmen and senators, but weren’t bribed yet using FRB lobbyists, and this is why the barons agreed to fight their king.
Which banking syndicate owners formed the FRB enterprise at Jekyll Island, Georgia in 1910, is irrelevant to proving all current FRB masters make up one (1) enterprise of RICO participants who defraud consumers using their agents mainly within banking administrations and courthouses. What counts in court under the RICO Act, is showing a decades old repetition of stolen/owed moneys being ultimately laundered/misappropriated to the FRB enterprise by contracted/paid/bribed government agents (conspiracies committed), with their masters knowingly profited (results successful). NO PROBLEM! Thus a cause of action has been established in this documented letter. Who gets sued, is the participant with the deepest pockets. Where else do consumers’ stolen moneys come from, and go to, after they’re FRB merchant processed (held/saved), or FRB transferred (spent/invested) within the FRB global economy by ATs, but to either an FRB, WB or IMF master’s investment corporation!!!! If you take in a border, then you’re constructively notified the border is wanted by cops for committing a crime, but you only turn a blind eye, you’re now an aider and abettor after the fact to the crime your border committed. What the FRB enterprise has been doing for decades John, IS A WHOLE LOT WORSE! It aids and abets crimes before they’re committed by bribing all its elected and appointed managers, with their salaries and perks into signing off on multiple contracts to perform, using its subordinate agents who are required to routinely commit scams on consumers, so all its owner colleagues within the FRB; WB; and IMF can count on agencies making their huge, hot remittance payments on time! Thus FRB banking contracts, are the mediums used for illegally funneling consumers’ stolen moneys to the FRB enterprise using municipals! All of this is absolutely, positively, verifiable! You can’t hide the fact all FRB enterprise spoils come from ATs and consumers! And you can’t hide the fact that at least 50% of all official complaints filed on ATs, result in consumers being defrauded to some extent by FRB agents! As I stated before John, even if you didn’t know your agents were defrauding consumers, due to those three (3) legal doctrines cited in this letter, you and your colleagues are still on the hook to compensate FRB victims for RICO injuries sustained.
All that’s needed for any consumer to file a completely credible RICO cause of action claim on any FRB owner, or their associate/accomplice anywhere in the world, is by showing they were scammed out of their U.S. constitutional rights by an FRB subordinate agent with property losses sustained. Nothing else is need, but to show the relationship, purpose, pattern and motive for the MASTERS and their AGENTS having racketeered against consumers at least twice (2). No problem John! When the FRB defendants get their complaints and then have their attorneys boldly deny the facts with obvious lies (highly illegal in federal court), everyone who reads the published court case articles online, will also be filing RICO lawsuits against the FRB enterprise (power in numbers).
Any attorney/analyst looking at all my court case records, would absolutely, positively, determine I was FRB enterprise defrauded for 12 years out of all the properties owed to me, after I paid for equitable relief within commerce based forums! Consequently, the FRB principal-masters and their accomplices knowingly benefited/profited from laundering/misappropriation scams committed by their agents.
Just by the FRB masters merely knowing their managers and agents are working hard at defrauding consumers to profit their enterprise, means that any negligent act any one of them commits in the process, makes every FRB participant liable to every victim for every type of injury sustained. You crossed the line when you had my wife murdered John! How will your enterprise be paying off this debt?
Darryl Schneider
10406 N 26 Street
Tampa, FL 33612
USA
813-585-0552
Enclosures: (2)
My wife’s filmed execution, given to me by one (1) of at least three (3) fired and missing agent cops who were involved, and my 12/2020 letter to you John.
cc: Networks gearing up
P.S. A legacy of shame, dishonor and immense debt is what comes to mind when I hear the sir names Rothschild and Rockefeller. Make up whatever aristocratic titles you wish to call yourselves, but after your clan stole their last trillion, and murdered their last million, to say it’s notorious for being chuck-full of some really bad career criminals, would be a gross understatement!
12-07-20
John “Jay” Rockefeller IV
200 Lake Road
Tarry Town, NY 10591
202-291-2445
USPS Certified Mail 70200090000161143666
12-11-20
John “Jay” Rockefeller IV
2121 Park N.W. Road
Washington, D.C. 20010
202-291-2445
FedEx with Signature
RE: Aiding and Abetting Business Associates with Fiduciary Duties to the Public while They Racketeer as Accessory before (ABTF) and after (AATF) the Fact
Mr. Rockefeller:
We spoke on both September 31 and October 1, 2020, in which I gave you two (2) opportunities to correct a wrong that you and your family’s bank (J P Morgan Chase Bank) were responsible for having proximately caused me and my co-plaintiff. Have one of your complex litigation (RICO/antitrust) attorneys review federal case 20-CV-78 and the contents of this letter. On September 31, 2020, you incorrectly wanted to believed I was contacting you as a former U.S. senator, no longer in a position to help me, but after I told you that Donald Trump, who you indirectly compensate, defaulted on my federal court case claims of racketeering, antitrust and breach of fiduciary duty by covering up at least one murder, in violation of Section 3 of Article 2, of the U.S. Constitution (Take Care Clause), you asked me for my name and telephone number, stating that you would have an affiliate of yours contact me. To date, I still have not heard back from anyone affiliated with you concerning this matter.
Let me explain to you why I initially contacted you and will be staying in touch with you like a close friend until justice has been served in this matter. When in 2012, after local Sheriff David Gee and local Chief Judge Ronald Ficarrotta, both of whom continue to receive state and federal tax dollars, deliberately failed to act appropriately in having my mother’s murderers charged and prosecuted, I found myself having to go higher up your crooked, governmental chain of command asking for assistance, but found none even among its affiliated media conglomerates and asked myself why! The answer always came back to you and J P Morgan Chase Bank. Each time we spoke, you asked who referred me to you. I dismissed directly answering this question, but will now answer it for you. A 100 plus, high ranking government officials, movie stars, investigative reporters and economic professors, confirmed to me that you and the other Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) owners were indirectly behind my not being able to receive justice in this matter, because while you were in the U.S. senate for three (3) decades, you instructed your presidential, gubernatorial, congressional, CIA and senatorial enterprise members (your friends) to turn a blind eye to local government corruption (violations of human and civil rights) in order to maximize FRB profits. Consequently, these friends of yours, all participants within your banking enterprise, allowed the governors in each state to in turn allow their local government grunts, which include state judges, to freely trample the public’s constitutional rights (substantive state and federal due process rights) with complete and full anonymity and immunity granted as a perk for bring in your spoils. Once a banking syndicate allows honest services frauds (judicial tyranny) as a form of antitrust during court cases, both state and federal statutes are ignored and the country goes completely to pot, as in a free-for-all from the top tier right down to the bottom! Why have legislative and executive branches of government (statutes with their enforcement), if the judicial branch is just going to ignore the applicable statutes like their members are either mentally retarded (incompetent) or reside inside someone’s back pocket (on the take)?
Most of your enterprise’s members and affiliates are pointing the finger at you for my losses in 25 court cases due to over 80 clear abuse of discretions committed by local judges that you continue to control and manage through Governor Ronald DeSantis! When either a governor (Rick Scott) or state attorney general (Pamela Bondi) are constructively notified of the facts through documents, but lie about having read the documents because his or her name was not on them, this is beyond reasonable doubt evidence of racketeering with others to defraud. A few of your rudest enterprise members whom I spoke with were Arnold Schwarzenegger at 310-573-0073, who described his former position as governor of the State of California, given to him by Jacob Rothschild, as “The dirtiest job in California.” Along with Connie Chung and her husband Maury Povich at 212-799-1959 who stated “Sorry to hear about your mother. There’s a higher level up from the presidency.” All three (3) of these high paid actors (liars) confirmed that they continue receiving their perks through current and former employers that the FRBs indirectly control and finically support (Hollywood and media conglomerates). And current and former high ranking government officials obtain their payoffs (bribes) through FRB affiliate banks. Give these members of your enterprise a call and listen to their anxieties manifest in your ear! None of the former officials or investigative reporters I contacted, failed to point the finger at your banking syndicate for the U.S. president (Donald Trump) and two (2) Florida governors (Rick Scott & Ronald DeSantis) having ignored their fiduciary duties to me and my murdered mother as a requirement for continuing to keep both their jobs and FRB allotted perks coming in to them, by not restraining any local local government grunts while they, you and the FRBs continue to collect fortunes from the following sources: 1) state taxes, fines and illegal assessments (water assessment taxes); 2) interest on loans; 3) federal tax dollars (national deficit collections every year); and mainly from 4) illegal note laundering using conversion schemes (buy backs and swapping of loan debts, with falsifying both the types of notes converted and the transaction dates for pre or post compensating affiliates on ledgers) allied with your co-conspiring, private, criminal banks (an illegal worldwide banking syndicate pyramid scheme that never runs out of inflated, government backed currency). Completely and totally illegal because when someone at a bank makes a loan mistake, the bank should have to pay for the mistake or go out of business, but the owners of the FRB, a quasi-government agency, officially and illegally alleviates any private bank’s losses on loans by giving it free money (bailouts) at the public’s expense so private, affiliate banks can continue aiding and abetting the FRB as loyal enterprise members. Then the FRBs just push some buttons on their computers and falsely appreciate the value of the notes (property) purchased from private banks on its ledgers. This is called having committed a fraud on the public by the FRB having inflated the value of money (properties), soon to be indirectly used in paying off its friends and affiliates. Banking losses that are covered up at the public’s expense, is illegal no matter how many foreign governments are committing the frauds because it makes pricing on goods and services increase. This is most definitely and absolutely a racketeering violation under the RICO Act because 1) the inflated value of the notes hurts consumers in their property and business by depreciating the value of their money for purchasing goods and services and 2) the inflated notes are used to aid and abet RICO/antitrust activities through pay offs (bribes) to officials and affiliates for turning a blind eye to honest services frauds that also hurt court case consumers in their property and business.
From Robert “Bob” Kennedy Jr. at 607-738-1184, who blames your banking syndicate for both ruining America and his relatives’ murders, to investigative reporter Abilio Acosta at 202-870-8282 who stated “The Rockefellers of America are no more eviler than the Castros of Cuba.”, to old man Carl Bernstein at 631-725-5863, who stated “Most of the 20th century government conspiracies started when Nelson Rockefeller became governor of the State of New York (1958).” All of these celebrities pointed their fingers at the Rockefellers and their banking syndicate for my losses! A bit of free information: When you pay super large amounts of property even through foreign banking syndicates to compensate your corrupted, American allies for both services rendered and confidentialities kept in order for your banking enterprise to continue to stay in the black, all of them know where their fortunes came from, and without too much persuading, are going to forever recite who is responsible for either their prosperity or misfortune. When you build up the egos of stupid, arrogant vermin by making them well known celebrities, after a while the riffraff have rather high opinions of themselves and start to believe they are more important than the ones paying them. And your friends and affiliates know it is too late in the game for you at age 83 to start getting rid of all of them for speaking their minds! Your friends and affiliates understand that by standing together, they will not be defeated anytime soon (preservation instinct among animals). Who has who over a barrel? Sorry and no hard feeling, but many of your friends and affiliates made great witnesses Jay! Perhaps you should start giving these greedy stoolpigeons shares of stock in J P Morgan Chase Bank to boot! In legal terms, shareholders (CEO Jamie Dimon) do not own the corporation, but the securities that give them a less than well-defined claim on its earnings. Although many top CEOs pledge their loyalties to shareholders, their actions and their pay packages often bespeak other loyalties. in Instead of striving for 30 years to gain total control over rotten to the core human beings on some dirt bowl for a few dollars more, you should have been striving at piercing the veil with the Hadron Collider so you could leave both Earth and mankind while living forever. There is a timeless zone between universes (string theory), and if you make it there, you may be able to live forever with your demon, alien friends. What is on the other side of the veil are not spirits or ghosts, but the real kings of this realm.
Consequently, you have been both 1) indirectly involved in this matter since the beginning of it in 8/2012, and are now 2) directly involved in it after having been constructively notified (actual notice given) of the facts by the person at your residence and/or office who signed for this letter. Please read on.
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), not to be confused with any Rockefeller influenced and corrupt organization, is a body of federal laws implemented only in American to stop organized crimes from being committed by racketeers (mobsters). What this act did was allow the American government to prosecute the leaders of any syndicate (all enterprises, including those within financial institutions) for the crimes they ordered others to commit, closing a perceived loophole that allowed a person (you through your lobbyists) who instructed someone else to commit a crime, to be exempt from trial because they did not actually commit the crime. What mobsters have done for decades to benefit from staying in power is no different than what the FRB owners have done for decades to benefit from staying in power, when they too pay off subordinate affiliates to implement their illegal plans. I only care about how your slash and burn approach to bringing in the bankers’ spoils has turned American judges into power, hungry, treasonous tyrants, unwilling to honor state and federal laws that are on the books (honest services frauds) as favors to their local affiliates because your federally employed friends and media conglomerates notoriously turn a blind eye to state and federal substantive due process right violations committed by state governors for their own continuing profits and gains! Unfortunately what you did in the senate has been mirrored by state governors throughout America when they too allow their friends to do as they please to citizens’ state and federal constitutional rights during court cases for their own continuing profits and gains. If laws are on the books, they have to be honored by all officers of the court, no matter who the parties are, period!
Countless numbers of disconnected aiding and abetting activities through banking syndicates (FRBs) that implement illegal monetary conversions with pre and post transfers aided and abetted by private, affiliate, criminal banks that eventually wind up going to your friends within the executive and judicial branches of government with fiduciary duties to citizens not to aid and abet criminal acts committed on them, in any way, shape or form (disconnected RICO predicate acts), when totaled together as either active or inactive participations in a RICO conspiracy, once the FRB owners involved are constructively notified (actual notice given) to either 1) remedy the injuries they participated in, or 2) divest their illegal gains, makes them as civilly liable as the participants (Donald Trump and Willow Bay (ABC, Inc.)) and the principals (Ronald Ficarrotta and David Gee), if an owner subsequently acquiesces in doing either one, and is confirmation of having knowingly and intentionally violated Title 18, Chapter 96, Section 1962(a)). As part owner of J P Morgan Chase Bank, continuing to benefit friends and affiliates of yours (presidents, governors, senators, congress members, arrogant peon judges and media conglomerates) as they in turn aid and abet other criminals in office by failing to notify law enforcement or the public at large of the crimes committed (violation of their fiduciary duties) in order not to hinder the flow of your banking profits from the local levels, most definitely meets the proximate causation rule for liability! In other words, J P Morgan Chase Bank and the other FRBs, indirectly pay millions of American government officials and affiliates 100s of billions of dollars each year in either U.S. and/or foreign tax dollars including non-monetary perks for the purpose of keeping all of them working for their enterprise which makes many of them 100s of millions each year for continuing to control and manage the flow of fines, assessments, FRB loans (interest premiums, note purchases and swaps with illegal conversions and dating methods used) along with tax dollars (state tax proceeds and interest on the national deficit) going to their owners, with all participants knowing full well that in the process of bringing in your spoils, citizens’ state and federal substantive due process rights are being violated at the local levels due to considerations given for doing your bidding. You have over 40% of the citizens in the United States, both officials and affiliates, defrauding the public for you, with their jobs and perks held over their heads as collateral. Good job Jay! So your friends sometimes turn a blind eye to the public’s U.S. constitutional rights being violated by local government grunts and their affiliates, while the unspoken rule is for media conglomerates not to air any local newsworthy events involving local officials, until asked to do so by local officials (officials policing officials). And why control all of the American media conglomerates, if victims can just go overseas to have local crimes aired on international new broadcasting stations? So your foreign banking syndicate affiliates routinely stop any publicity abroad to protect your interests in America. This is confirmation of them being your dubious banking associates that aid, abet and profit off your criminal activities as one dirty hand washes the other. Now days, the largest crooks on the face of the planet are not mobsters, but high ranking government officials (white mafia), bought and paid for by the owners of the FRBs for increased banking profits and worldwide gains!
What you did in the senate was pretend you were playing the board game Monopoly on a much larger scale. You did an excellent job of making the U.S. government your very own private business while working as a federal employee when you invited all the members of the federal government to join the Federal Reserve banking enterprise with irresistible perks offered. How does a non-member join? Now days using illegal lobbing techniques and strategies, all of the members of both the senate and house are your flunky friends who secretly earn millions per year while turning a blind eye to human and civil rights violations that allow local, government grunts and their affiliates to continue bringing in banking syndicate spoils while committing their own defrauding schemes, some during commerce based business transactions (courtroom antitrust activities). Who in America indirectly winds up paying your politician friends and allies 100s of billions in tax and loan dollars? The downtrodden public through the FRBs! This is a huge smoking gun to prove high ranking officials are bribed into aiding and abetting the FRB owners every time they are constructively notified by citizens of state and federal substantive due process right violations committed, but turn a blind eye to their fiduciary duties with foreseeable racketeering against their constituents continuing on and on and on by local officials! Why would Donald Trump and ABC, Inc. along with the hundreds of state and federal employees and media reporters that I contacted about this matter, violate my mother’s human rights by ignoring (turning a blind eye to) their fiduciary duties to take the appropriate action, or be in violation of the aiding and abetting laws as 1) accessories to both her murder cover-up (AATF) and 2) officials continuing to breach their fiduciary duties while racketeering (ABTF)? The answer is, because the illegal flow of perk money from the FRBs is just too good to pass up, forever keeping elected officials from ever making you unhappy, just their constituents. So these friends of yours allow local, government grunts unlimited considerations to injure the public. You never poop in your own nest! When citizens in America are used as cattle to be taken to market by the owners of the FRB, local government grunts and their affiliates are given considerations to violate state and federal constitutional rights of a few million citizens (livestock) a year when extracting the bankers’ blood money from every man, woman and child. Correct? And you live in America. Correct? No matter how far into the woods (national park) your residency becomes, you will still be living in America that you turned into a third world country with your victims right around the corner from you! Your lobbyists bribing officials so that the FRB owners can deceptively profit from illegal loan purchases and trades with conversion/reallocation payoff schemes that even use tax and loan proceeds from different countries, from different time periods, is one form of traitorous tyranny, but financially ruining citizens with court case antitrust violations that do not financially profit any banking syndicate, unless the winnings are parlayed and lost, is a sadist deviation void of any honor, integrity or code of conduct.
Under the RICO Act, there are statutes (Title 18, Chapter 96, Section 1962), case laws, doctrines (Pinkerton Liability Doctrine & Respondeat Superior Doctrine) and rules (Proximate Causation Rule & Continuing and Delayed Damages Rules) that allow victims to obtain total compensation for all their damages due to racketeering committed by any indirect participant. A participant is anyone who had the 1) knowledge of and the 2) intent in seeing that a RICO crime was enacted to damage someone in their property or business due to having either 3) taken an inappropriate action in furtherance of the crime, or 4) who inappropriately remained inactive in furtherance of the crime. No breach of fiduciary duty needs to be committed by a participant under Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly case, if it is plausible that the participant was indirectly part of the RICO conspiracy as either an 1) accessory before the fact (ABTF), or as an 2) accessory after the fact (AATF) to the crime. To win at trial, a victim only has to prove by the preponderance of evidence (more likely than not) that the 3) participant was illegally benefited (not necessarily monetarily) with at least one (1) constructive notice given to him or her to remedy the injury within a reasonable amount of time (30 days) as a benefited participant, or be sued for racketeering (triple damages). Or a victim only has to prove the 4) participant was a benefactor who knew of an illegal act committed, but aided and abetted the co-conspirator anyway during his or her future crime sprees. This is how J P Morgan Chase Bank and the other 11 FRBs can be legally dragged into this matter as defendants. Please read on.
An accessory-after-the-fact is someone who assists 1) someone else who has committed a crime, 2) after the person has committed the crime, 3) with knowledge that the person committed the crime, and 4) with the intent to help the person avoid arrest or punishment by either directly helping the person or by indirectly helping the person through another. And an aider and abettor is someone who assists 1) someone else in committing a crime, 2) before or during the crime, 3) with knowledge that the person intends on committing, or is committing, the crime, and 4) with the intent of helping the person commit a future or current crime by committing an inappropriate action or inaction, not necessarily illegal in and by itself, either by directly helping the person, or indirectly helping the person through another. American tax dollars are used to pay off the national debt held by FRBs that are also paid dividends as private corporations, one of which is J P Morgan Chase Bank owned by your family. J P Morgan Chase Bank holds stock in the FRB and earns dividends, but more importantly, once the national deficit is deducted accordingly at the end of each tax cycle, the moneys taken in by the FRB changes form (conversion) as a debt reimbursement (collection) on an electronic ledger from public tax dollars, to credits used to indirectly benefit large numbers of government officials and affiliates for no apparent rhyme or reason, but to compensate them for controlling and managing the FRB’s monetary interests (loans, taxes, fines, assessments, all of which stimulate the economy). And money spent indirectly benefits the FRB owners again for owning stock in numerous, large corporations (Bilderbergers).
Participating in racketeering schemes in any way, shape or form, is considered aiding and abetting the commission of RICO predicate acts as an ABTF under Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), violations under either Title 18, Chapter 96, Sections (a, b, c and d), and are considered racketeering activity for purposes of proving a RICO violation. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1961(1). See in re Trilegiant Corp., Inc., 11F. Supp. 3d 132 (2014). Under Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), provision defining racketeering activity to include any act involving murder, RICO defendant’s act need not be murder, so long as it directly concerns murder. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1961(1)(A). U.S. v. Miller, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, June 20, 1997, 116 F. 3d 64146 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1174. However, “even in the absence of a duty {fiduciary} to act or disclose information, inaction on the alleged aider and abettor’s part can provide a basis for liability where the inaction was designed intentionally to aid the primary fraud.” In re Monahan Ford Corp. of Flushing, 340 B.R. 1, 34 (Banter. E.D.N.Y. 2006) (internal quotation marks omitted). Under Title 18, Chapter 1, Section 2, whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal. And whoever willfully causes an act to be done (committed), which, if directly performed by him or another, would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal. The scope of this federal statute for aiders and abettors “is incredibly broad – – it can be implied in every charge for a federal substantive offense.” See Benton Martin, Jeremiah Newhall, Technology and the Guilty Mind. When Do Technology Providers Become Criminal Accomplices? The term “principal” refers to any actor who is primarily responsible for a criminal offense. A co-conspirator is an accessory who is engaged in a conspiracy with another or others. You can prove a conspiracy with material evidence of an overt act (an action or inaction) having been committed from which wrongful intent can be inferred, as opposed to a mere intention to commit a wrongful act, which is what a conspiracy to commit is.
The standard that the government must prove to convict a defendant of accessory after the fact to murder is that the defendant must have at least known the victim was dead or dying at the time he or she decided to act as an accessory after the fact to murder (my mother was murdered). 18 U.S.C.A. § 3. The accessory after the fact statute provides that “[w]hoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.” 18 U.S.C. § 3. Cited in U.S. v. Calderon, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, May 12, 2015, 785 F. 3d 847, 2015, WL 2190998. Everyone involved in this matter was either an 1) AATF or an 2) ABTF in my mother’s murder, out to defraud me in my business and property. The list of participants also includes you, especially if you remain inactive after 30 days (subsequently acquiesced in) when you were constructively noticed. Please read on.
The FRB is a quasi-governmental institution. Each reserve bank is organized like a corporation and privately owned (see the enclosed case laws allowing the FRBs to be sued for their owners committing torts through their banks). The capital stock of the 12 banks is owned by private member banks. This means that J P Morgan Chase Bank and the other FRBs can be sued for vicarious liability under the Respondeat Superior Doctrine (tort claim) as private companies under both the RICO/antitrust acts for any owner, manager or employee, having compensating Donald Trump or ABC, Inc. in any way, shape and form, both with fiduciary duties to me, with or without tax dollars, while they continue committing criminal activities to illegally deny me property owed in a commerce based industry (antitrust) using judges (John Roberts and Jon Levy) who are directly bribed with federal tax dollars (their salaries and perks are held over their heads in violation of Title 42, Chapter 21, Section 1985(1)). The federal bribery statute, 18 U.S.C. § 201(b), criminalizes the corrupt promise or transfer of anything of value (keeping their salaries, but more importantly keeping their perks and being in good standing with the enterprise) to influence an official act of a federal official, a fraud on the United States, or the commission or omission of any act (racketeering) inviolation of the official’s duty. And in return for Donald Trump and Willow Bay (ABC, Inc.) not being made by your judges to pay a penny to me, they continue to benefit you and the other FRB owners by helping them maintain both their economic control (foothold) and growth (profits) throughout world markets, bringing in your dividends on shares of stock in both the FRB and the Bilderberger companies. Banking syndicates could care less if some state judicial enterprise gets away with screwing a victim in a court case, just that 1) their operation remains in place with 2) the public continuing to spend money. Correct? The FRB governors (board members), U.S. presidents, congressmen, senators, state governors, media conglomerates, CIA agents and directors of U.S. departments of state are heavily paid moneys that come from the FRBs. Think there is no money trail? Not smart and very careless of you because just by using circumstantial evidence, there is no way in Hell 10’s of thousands of your affiliates, some in retirement, legitimately earn their 10s of millions per year that could have only come from the public sector (taxes and loans) funneled through a huge, corrupt banking syndicates! You through J P Morgan Chase Bank have to pay out huge amounts of property each period to control (bribe) your verminous friends, so they will continue controlling, managing and keeping quite your affairs! This is a your Achilles heel! Power hungry banking syndicates using concrete and traceable commodities (property on ledgers) to control (bribery through lobbyists) loose lipped, corruptible affiliates (descendants of apes) using a rudimentary legal structure (legislative, judicial and executive branches of government) to implement so called democracy (smoke and mirrors), has now become quite obvious when state and federal statutes are totally and completely ignored by the judicial branch for any contrived reason at all, as media conglomerates render court case victims silent. How is America any different then North Korea when human and civil rights are violated in both countries? There is a big difference. In America, these violations are committed a lot more indiscreetly and a lot more often, with tons more proplerty used to pay off your multitudes of loyal affiliates!
While in the senate, you accomplished three key maneuvers in maximizing FRB profits. 1) You had only loyal enterprise members’ names placed on elections ballots for presidential, gubernatorial, congressional and senatorial positions countrywide. 2) You took over control of every single one of the media broadcasting stations in America either by A) bribing the owners, B) taking over the stations by having affiliated shell companies buy them, or C) putting the stations completely out of business through the FCC (a 30 year long feat). And 3) had your close friends within the CIA, keep state governors in line with your banking scheme. The heart of your operation is at the state gubernatorial levels where most of your spoils come from.
I spoke with another former governor, James Janos (Jesse Ventura) at 651-407-1619. Please give him a call. He stated “Together, all of the states in America take in enough tax dollars to pay off the national deficit within 10 years while still paying off their yearly expenses.” And “Minnesota along with the rest of America was completely taken over by the bankers before I was elected to office in 1999. They accomplished this by both coercing officials already in office, and by buying their people into office.” Paying off the national deficit will never happen because tax dollars along with the proceeds from illegal statewide property thefts, fines, assessments and levied excised taxes, go to profiting you and the other FRB owners. You did not work so very hard and long in the senate just to have a few fair-minded governors stop you from continuing to maximize profits for the FRB owners. Consequently, all state governors are continually watched, scrutinized and bullied by your CIA agents to produce your profits. From a managerial point of view, your system of controlling governors is severely flawed because it allows them to turn a blind eye to honest services frauds committed by trial and appellate court judges as favors to their local friends that do not amount to an increase in your spoils while rendering state and federal legislation completely impotent! Paying idiot, peon judges to do as they please during court cases, costs your government billions in tax dollars each year, while allowing them to place you on the meat hook for their mistakes! Pretty stupid Jay! If you wanted to continue paying your idiot government friends and affiliates (not in and of itself illegal in this matter), you should have intelligently replaced all of the state judges with computers and had just one high court decide new legal issues because computers cannot be bribed, nor can they racketeer on their own after your governors set them up in office, but Ronald Ficarrotta sure as Hell did! What these illegal judicial practices do is legally allow someone like myself to mount a vendetta against whomever aided and abetted those who opposed my acquiring what was stolen from me under the RICO/antitrust acts. Lines were crossed by Governor Rick Scott and Attorney General Pamela Bondi, that are continuing to injury me thorough Governor Ronald DeSantis and Attorney General Ashley Moody, but are not directly increasing FRB proceeds, but have now allowed me to sue you for my losses (damages) that they participated in as members of your enterprise! Numerous and very obvious human rights violations covered up by all of your governors and media conglomerates by the minute, makes Kim Jong-un of North Korea look like a choirboy! A human rights violation is one in which a victim cannot get a fair trial. For 8 years, I and my murdered mother have not been able to even get to trial on her murder, nor my stolen property!
The FRBs do the following: Operate a financial Laundromat for its friends (officials and affiliates) by illegally converting worthless notes purchased or swapped with private, affiliate, criminal banks that are then used to pre or post profit its friends and affiliates with by either having payments made to them or their affiliates for supposed services rendered, or as highly discounted purchase options granted to them through their affiliates. The FRB either 1) launders the loans of private, criminal banks by reselling them back to the same group of banks at a fraction (10 percent or less) of the face-value price it paid the banks for them, or 2) it swaps the banks’ bad paper (notes) at face value for federal debt instruments, which replaces the banks’ non-performing assets having no resale value with safe, interest-paying and highly marketable assets. The FRBs purchase notes from their affiliate banks and inflate their value to indirectly grant either 1) service payments, or 2) purchase options to its friends and affiliates. How many decades old banking notes purchased and/or swapped were kept until they were used to compensate Donald Trump for four (4) years’ worth of turning a blind eye to your worldwide racketeering scheme?
Immediately after the 2008 financial meltdown, the FRB laundered more than $2 trillion in worthless assets held on the balance sheets of private banks. According to a watered-down 2011 audit of the FRB by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), there have been $16 trillion in FRB bailouts (freebies) to banks and corporations around the world since the financial meltdown in 2008. Since that report, Bloomberg has reported on an additional $9 trillion in secret, off-balance-sheet FRB transactions that it refuses to discuss. So if the FRB loan, Laundromat and consignment shop can take in a large enough wash by purchasing enough worthless financial assets (notes) for any given year, removing them from the books of its affiliate private banks, it can profit its friends and affiliates for years into the future with just one prior laundered load by both illegally converting the types of notes purchased and changing the transaction dates with its affiliate banks. Correct? And this works out better if paying billionaires 100s of millions who have so many assets, it would be easy to hide a half billion in property here or there, supposedly earned before or after they started working for you and the FRBs. Correct?
My point is that, if the FRB can inflate worthless ledger entries into highly valued property around the world at any time either past, present or in the future, creating property with the push of a button that costs nothing, it can easily and covertly benefit anyone, anywhere, at any time through its illegally profited private, affiliate, criminal banks, but by using electronic transactions, there is always a trail of properties left behind on memory. Property has to have a physical form, even if it is only on backed up computer software ledgers. By the shear amount of property doled out by the FRBs (gravy train) and their banking affiliates to keep numerous friends and affiliates with fiduciary duties to the public maintaining the FRB’s economic growth at the public’s expense, means there is an enormous amount of circumstantial evidence proving a RICO conspiracy involving J P Morgan Chase Bank and the other FRBs that has resulted in millions of victims (some seen on television) having been defrauded out of their human and civil rights that the FRB owners knowingly funded by having aided and abetted the ones who participated in the crimes!
The FRB receiving tax dollars, dividends and laundering worthless notes and then profiting its friends and affiliates at the public’s expense, in and of itself, is not what damaged me, but it shows how crooked the owners of the FRB are. What makes you and the other FRB owners liable to me for damages is the following:
My Current Damages:
1) By having knowingly and intentionally aided and abetted officials with fiduciary duties while they violated state and federal substantive due process rights that resulted in my damages, and
My Future Triple Remedial Damages:
2) If after having been constructively notified of the contents of this letter as a FRB owner (prior knowledge), you continue to participate in RICO/antitrust activities with Donald Trump, ABC, Inc., John Roberts, Jon Levy, John DeSantis Ashley Moody, or any other participant, by aiding and abetting (profiting or gaining) him or her through the FRBs in any way, shape or form while they break the law, foreseeably damaging me in the future, J P Morgan Chase Bank will most definitely be liable to me as a racketeering participant for all of my losses in triplicate (triple remedial damages)! The time for you to remedy this matter is before your friend John Roberts has Jon Levy commit more honest services frauds, costing me my property owed in case 20-CV-78, and I go ballistic!
When bar attorneys Joseph Biden and Kamala Harris (executive branch has a fiduciary duty to the public to abide by state and federal laws) whom I have already constructively notified of this matter (actual notice given), aid and abet John Roberts, Jon Levy (judicial branch), Ronald DeSantis and Ashley Moody (executive branch) all with fiduciary duties to me and my murdered mother as accessories before (ABTF) and after (AATF) the fact in a bonafide RICO conspiracy, while you and the other FRB owners continue to monetarily shell out 100s of billions per year to compensate all of them and other co-conspiring officials and affiliates in this matter with fiduciary duties to me, without any rhyme or reason other than for jobs well done in maintaining your banking profits as a benefit, you and J P Morgan Chase Bank will be just a guilty as any of the other participants for my future damages. Consequently, due to vicarious liability under the Respondeat Superior Doctrine, J P Morgan Chase Bank will be sued after a reasonable amount of time (30 days) from you having been constructively notified of this letter, if the appropriate assistance to rectify this matter is not given and my U.S. constitutional rights continue to be violated with 1) foreseeable damages reoccurring, 2) preexisting damage amounts foreseeably appreciating and 3) unknown delayed damages manifesting. Also, J P Morgan Chase Bank can be sued under FRCP Rule 19 in place of all of the other FRBs for damages caused by their owners, managers or employees having aided and abetted (profited) any co-conspirator in this matter for no apparent rhyme or reason other than for their participation in RICO/antitrust activities that help control and manage the FRB’s business affairs. Government employees along with even quasi-government ones, act as public fiduciaries and are thus liable for not having acted appropriately when they turn a blind eye to future foreseeable criminal activities without having reported them to law enforcement, nor the public at large.
The relationship between public officials and the public has been described by scholars as fiduciary in nature. (See e.g. Rave, 2013; Leib, Ponet & Serota, 2013; Ponet & Lieb, 2011; Natelson, 2004) So what is a fiduciary? Dictionary.com defines the term fiduciary as relating to, “a person to whom property or power is entrusted for the benefit of another.” There are four factors that identify a relationship as a fiduciary one:
1. The beneficiary has delegated authority to the fiduciary to act on its behalf;
2. The fiduciary has discretionary powers over the beneficiary’s assets or interests;
3. The fiduciary is in a position superior to that of the beneficiary due to specialized access, knowledge or ability; and
4. The beneficiary trusts that the fiduciary will act in the beneficiary’s best interest. (Ponet & Leib, 2011.) Consequently, the FRB owners are public fiduciaries who are already liable for my current damages, but if they continue to aid and abet in any way, shape or form, their friends or affiliates (participants) in causing me future foreseeable damages in case 20-CV-78, you alone will be held liable for triple remedial on my current damages under the RICO Act. In other words, your friends Donald Trump and Willow Bay (ABC, Inc.) either pay me what is owed, or you will be taking their place in the next court case for triple on what they will still owe me under the RICO Act when they benefit from Jon Levy injuring me in case 20-CV-78.
If I can show that it is more likely than not that an owner, manager or employee of J P Morgan Chase Bank 1) knowingly aided and abetted (ABTF) RICO activities, or 2) knowingly covered up prior RICO activities (AATF), activities that were committed by a principal or a co-conspiring accessory (both considered participants), which proximately caused my damages, and I absolutely, positively can, I can sue J P Morgan Chase Bank for my full damage amount in this matter and should win, but I will not have to. I have learned a lesson from the master bankers. If a debt owed to me, is not paid in full, I can sell it to another for collection. Who would buy your debt to me? Any humiliated banking syndicate that believes you cannot keep your local grunts in line when you allow the vermin to piss on both your countrymen and the U.S. Constitution that only depreciates the dollar. Or perhaps a foreign government who dislikes your slash and burn approach to bringing in profits.
And if I can show that any FRB owner profited a couple of good and loyal enterprise members with stolen tax dollars, like a U.S. president and senator (the Clintons) who retired with 100’s of millions more than they walked into their government offices with, he or she is on the hook for a lot more than my damages in this matter. How many billions of dollars per year do you payout through the FRB to stimulate (bribe) government officials into continuing to turn a blind eye to local, government corruption in order to keep good government grunts bringing in your spoils by maintaining your foothold on the American economy? Plenty!
Congratulations, you are undoubtedly the king of America, but the United States has been using the common law legal tradition of English law for centuries. One English common law that America follows is that the king is liable to his subjects for the damages he causes them to suffer. Correct? No longer in America! To you and your family, citizens are property, as if dogs without even humanitarian rights, unless they happen to be your friends. What I am not concerned with is you and your affiliated banking syndicates having replaced the governments of most countries (the work of your CIA agents) with your cronies now in positions of power and then fixing it so the bastard governments never pay off their debts (countries working for the bankers forever). As soon as the FRB became a quasi-government agency, you and your affiliated banking syndicate owners started to control the gross national product of America by 1) controlling interests rates through the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC); 2) bribing federal and state officials and their affiliates (presidents, congressmen, senators, governors and media conglomerates) into going along with your inflationary plan of not paying off their nation’s debt; but to 3) keep private, criminal, affiliate banks loaning money out so that the FRB could; 4) have access to enough of it (converted tax and loan dollars) to continue compensating all of its affiliated enterprise members, especially the media conglomerates to stay in the black (a pyramid scheme which pays affiliates to work the public which never runs out of genuine U.S. backed currency). Without every media conglomerate, president, congressman, senator and governor continually working for you, your enterprise’s structure within government agencies would falter and the FRB would lose profits. I am also not concerned with your many population reduction programs, excluding the indiscriminate use of bioweapons (pneumoniaes) that cause numerous chronic respiratory ailments (70% of the population) that you have sprayed on the public at large from sleek, silver, military jets flying at 60,000 feet (excluding Tarry Town, NY), while you finish off the weakened with COVID-19 (sadistically crafty). Did you give old and contaminated Donald Trump a COVID-19 fusion protein based vaccine (extracellular antibody production), with or without an adenovirus (intracellular nanobody protein targeting) vaccine? It certainly does pay to be your friend, so one has access to the treasure-trove of cures to your man-made germs. When will you be spreading the H5N1 (avian flu) around, so I can start living underground? What I have a huge problem with is when state and federal laws are knowingly and deliberately ignored by honorless, bastard judges desiring to keep their positions within local circuits by participating in local defrauding schemes. Consequently they hurt litigants by committing honest services frauds in a commerce based industry in which money paid to courthouses for fair and equitable rulings, results in antitrust scams sanctioned by state governors. And in my federal 20-CV-78 case, John Roberts sanctioned it to be illegally dismissed by Jon Levy! Screw your verminous, corrupted friends and affiliates! When victims with U.S. constitution rights go higher up the governmental chain of command by constructively notifying any one of your bribed friends in high places with fiduciary duties to the public for help and get absolutely nothing for their efforts, you sir are liable to each and every victim for having aided and abetted any one (1) of your bought and paid for friends while they knowingly and intentionally participated in RICO predicate acts because you also knowingly and intentionally racketeered with each and every one of them!
We can be friends Jay, just as soon as I and my murdered mother get what we are owed from your bribed allies. I am owed $9.5 million at a nominal rate of interest, and my mother is owed her killers put in prison. There is no statute of limitations on having participated in a murder cover-up or a fraud on the court. So your heirs will be owing my heirs with interest until my heirs own a nominal percentage of J P Morgan Chase Bank. Should you be unwilling to take the appropriate corrective actions in this matter, I am formally putting my dibs in on what is owed to me and my co-plaintiff by you and J P Morgan Chase Bank before anyone else does. These days, $9.5 million is worth absolutely nothing to a banking syndicate and should be an amount worth paying on a ledger to obtain a clear conscience, especially when the entry will never cost you or your affiliates a penny. Consider having to inflate a worthless note on a computer ledger to pay me with, business as usual.
To officially remedy this matter, 1) I would have Ronald Ficarrotta fired so he cannot hurt any more of my pending cases in which I will be legally going after J P Morgan Chase Bank for; 2) have Judge Jon Levy who was legitimately recused in federal district court Portland, Maine (20-CV-78), but illegally refuses to remove himself from the case in order to stall it and then dismiss it per John Roberts’ (301-215-7688) request, give an order to transfer it to another district court, after which I will tell this court which district to transfer it to, but will not need to, if you; 3) have Donald Trump pay his $2.1 million owed to me along with the $5.4 million he owes me for my book sales losses as a beneficiary of ABC, Inc., by having defaulted on my claims made about him during case 20-CV-78; and 4) have ABC, Inc. pay me its $2.1 million owed, all at a nominal rate of interest since 8/2012 and we are done here. We will be finished without my second book being published with the contents of this letter added to it along with your photo placed on the cover of it and without you being sued in my next court case for triple remedial on the $9.5 million owed ($28.5 million) after Donald Trump through John Roberts has Jon Levy illegally dismiss case 20-CV-78.
You have 15 days to have one of your attorneys contact me so I can have my attorney negotiate the ending of this matter without copies of this letter and incriminating documents going to courthouses, websites, foreign banking syndicates and perhaps Kim Jong-un so he can hang one of them in Joseph Biden’s ear! I truly believe that living under the North Korean regime would be more tolerable than having to endure the daily wrongs committed by the multitudes of your incredibly stupid and spiteful officials here in America, home of the proud and the brave! I honestly wish my ancestors had never moved to your America. Living in this country under your regime has been nothing but one ordeal after another with ruined lives for most!
So the FRBs together control the economics of most sovereign countries, all seemingly worth more than they ever were, but unfortunately you and the other FRB owners have made them so inhospitable, they are uninhabitable and worthless! What good is a country, if its leaders turn a blind eye to millions of subordinate enterprise members continuously injuring citizens for mere self-satisfaction? Absolutely nothing!
Sincerely,
Darryl Schneider
10406 N 26 Street
Tampa, FL 33612
813-585-0552
Enclosures: Parcels sent to 1) President Donald Trump, 2) U.S. Chief Judge John Roberts and 3) one that was sent to both Joseph Biden & Kamala Harris